IP Library Granted Patent US 12,618,102
Granted Patent B2
US 12,618,102 · App. 17/528,967 · Granted May 5, 2026

Biochemical reaction methods and reagents comprising intrinsically disordered regions

Inventors: Niall Armes (Cambridge, GB); Hannah Williams (Cambridge, GB); Matthew Forrest (Cambridge, GB); Mathew Parker (Cambridge, GB); Sidong Liu (Cambridge, GB); Lauren Parker (Cambridge, GB)
Assignee: Biocrucible Limited
C12Q1/6848C07K1/14C12Q1/6853C07K2319/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,618,102
App. No.
17/528,967
Granted
May 5, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention relates to processes for performing biochemical reactions, such as in an aqueous in vitro reaction system. The processes involve macromolecules, particularly polypeptides, comprising one or more functional intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). The invention also relates to IDR-macromolecules, including IDR-polypeptides, including macromolecules or polypeptides comprising a tagged amino acid sequence which comprises or consists of one or more functional IDRs. Such functional IDRs are capable of increasing the efficiency of the biochemical reaction. The invention relates to kits comprising any such macromolecules and polypeptides. The invention further relates to processes for stimulating or enhancing liquid-liquid demixing in a solution using any such macromolecules and polypeptides, including in combination with multivalent metal ions, thereby providing reagents capable of increasing the efficiency of a biochemical reaction.

Claims (16)

1 . A fusion protein comprising a first polypeptide fused to a second polypeptide, wherein the first polypeptide comprises of a Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (RPA) component selected from a recombinase agent, a single-strand stabilizing agent, a polymerase, and a recombinase loading protein, further wherein the second polypeptide comprises of at least one functional intrinsically-disordered region (IDR) which comprises the amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NOs: 1-43.

2 . The fusion protein of claim 1 , wherein the second polypeptide consists of at least one functional intrinsically-disordered region (IDR).

3 . The fusion protein of claim 1 , wherein the fusion protein is capable of causing liquid-liquid demixing and the formation of a plurality of phase-separated aqueous compartments.

4 . The fusion protein of claim 1 , wherein the first polypeptide consists of an RPA component selected from a recombinase agent, a single-strand stabilizing agent, a polymerase, and a recombinase loading protein.

5 . The fusion protein of claim 1 , wherein the RPA component is:

(a) a recombinase agent selected from the group consisting of: UvsX, T4 UvsX, T6 UvsX, RB18 UvsX, E. coli phage wV7 UvsX, Shigella phage CB8 UvsX, Shigella phage Shfl2 UvsX, E. coli phage AR1 UvsX, phage vB_EcoM_G4507 UvsX, Shigella phage SHFML-11 UvsX, Escherichia phage vB_EcoM_DalCa UvsX, E. coli RecA, E. coli RadA, E. coli RadB, E. coli Rad 51 or any functional analog, homolog or derivative thereof, and any combination thereof;

(b) a recombinase loading protein selected from the group consisting of UvsY, E. coli RecO, E. coli RecR or any functional analog, homolog or derivative thereof, and any combination thereof;

(c) a polymerase selected from the group consisting of eukaryotic pol-«, eukaryotic pol-β, eukaryotic pol-8, eukaryotic pol-¿, Bacillus stearothermophilus polymerase I large fragment, Bacillus subtilis Pol I large fragment (Bsu polymerase), Listeria monocytogenes DNA polymerase I, S. aureus DNA polymerase I (Sau polymerase), E. coli DNA polymerase I Klenow fragment, E. coli DNA polymerase I, E. coli DNA polymerase II, E. coli DNA polymerase III, E. coli DNA polymerase IV, E. coli DNA polymerase V, bacteriophage T4 gp43 DNA polymerase, bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase, and bacteriophage Phi-29 DNA polymerase, or any functional analog, homolog or derivative thereof, and any combination thereof; or

(d) a single strand stabilizing agent is selected from the group consisting of Gp32, E. coli SSB protein, phage T4 Gp32 protein, phage Rb69 Gp32, phage vB_EcoM NBG1 Gp32, or any functional analog, homolog or derivative thereof, and any combination thereof.

6 . The fusion protein of claim 1 , wherein said RPA component is a single strand stabilizing agent that is a Gp32 protein, and wherein the fusion protein has: (i) an amino acid sequence having at least 80% identity to SEQ ID NO:120 or any one of SEQ ID NOs: 65 to 88; or (ii) the amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID NO: 120 or any one of SEQ ID NOs: 65 to 88.

7 . The fusion protein of claim 1 , wherein the second polypeptide is fused to the N-terminus of the first polypeptide, the C-terminus of the first polypeptide, or any amino acid position along a length of the first polypeptide.

8 . An isolated nucleic acid molecule encoding a fusion protein as defined in any one of claim 1-3, 4 or 5-7 .

9 . A kit comprising a fusion protein as defined in any one of claim 1-3, 4 or 5-7 .

10 . The kit of claim 9 , wherein the kit further comprises a recombinase agent, a recombinase loading protein, a polymerase, first and second nucleic acid primers, an exonuclease, a buffer, and/or a source of multivalent metal ions.

11 . The kit of claim 9 , wherein the first polypeptide of the fusion protein consists of an RPA component selected from the group consisting of: a recombinase agent, a single-strand stabilizing agent, a polymerase, and a recombinase loading protein, and wherein the kit further comprises an recombinase agent, an recombinase loading protein, a polymerase, first and second nucleic acid primers, an exonuclease, a buffer, and/or a source of multivalent metal ions.

12 . The kit of claim 10 , wherein all components are provided in lyophilized form.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 7, 2022
From: ARMES, NIALL; WILLIAMS, HANNAH; FORREST, MATTHEW; PARKER, MATHEW; LIU, SIDONG; PARKER, LAUREN
To: BIOCRUCIBLE LIMITED
Reel/Frame 060453/0398 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation PCTGB2020052866 · Nov 11, 2020
Related Publication 20220112547A1 · Apr 14, 2022
References Cited (122)
US 7270981B2 · Armes et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7399590B2 · Piepenburg et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7435561B2 · Piepenburg et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7666598B2 · Piepenburg et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8071308B2 · Piepenburg et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8637253B2 · Piepenburg et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10093908B2 · Piepenburg et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11339382B2 · Piepenburg et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20050112631A1 · Piepenburg et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20090029421A1 · Piepenburg et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090079963A1 · Ermantraut et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090297733A1 · Yamazaki et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090326903A1 · Ludwig · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100179068A1 · Kaiser et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20170355977A1 · Brangwynne et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20220112547A1 · Armes et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 110036105A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009520461A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013505016A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015512651A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2007029200A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008108927A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009112594A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010141940A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011034449A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013154898A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019147611A2 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
UniProt HSV-1 UL12 entry: G8HBC5. Retrieved from < https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/G8HBC5/entry > on Jul. 1, 2025. [cited by examiner]
Phillip Y. et al., Common Crowding Agents Have Only a Small Effect on Protein-Protein Interactions, 2009, Biophysical Journal, 97 pp. 875-885. [cited by applicant]
Reuven et al., “Recruitment of DNA repair MRN complex . . . ”, Biomolecules (Oct. 2019); vol. 9, Art. No. 584. [cited by applicant]
Tan et al., “The intrinsically disordered linker of [cited by applicant]
Zilman, Aggregation, Phase Separation and Spatial Morphologies of the Assemblies of FG Nucleoporins. Journal of Mol. Bio, vol. 430, Issue 23, Nov. 2, 2018, pp. 4730-4740. [cited by applicant]
Van der Lee et al., Classification of Intrinsically Disordered Regions and Proteins, 2014, Chem. Rev. 114, pp. 6589-6631. [cited by applicant]
Biswas, S et al., Mixed Macromolecular Crowding: A Protein and Solvent Perspective, 2018, ACS Omega, 3(4), pp. 4316-4330. [cited by applicant]
Chen, X., et al. Fusion Protein Linkers: Property, Design and Functionality, 2013, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 15, 65(10), pp. 1357-1369). [cited by applicant]
Chong et al., “Liquid-liquid phase separation in cellular signalling systems”, Current Opinion in Structural Biology, Elsevier Ltd, GB, vol. 41, Aug. 20, 2016 (Aug. 20, 2016), pp. 180-186. [cited by applicant]
Chou, W-L., et al., (2015) Recent Advances in Applications of Droplet Microfluidics, Micromachines, 6: 1249-1271. [cited by applicant]
DeAngelis M. M et al., (1995) Solid-Phase Reversible Immobilization for the Isolation of PCR Products, Nucleic Acids Research, 23(22): 4742-4743. [cited by applicant]
Hnisz et al., A Phase Separation Model for Transcriptional Control. Cell, Mar. 23, 2017;169(1):13-23. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/GB2020/052866, dated Apr. 7, 2021, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and where Applicable, Protest Fees, PCT/GB2020/052866, dated Feb. 15, 2021, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kong et al., Biphasic recruitment of TRF2 to DNA damage sites promotes non-sister chromatid homologous recombination repair. J Cell Sci. 2018;131(23). [cited by applicant]
Kozlowski, L. P., et al., MetaDisorder: a meta-server for the prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins. BMC ioinformatics, 2012, 13(1): 111 [cited by applicant]
Kuznetsova, I., M et al., (What Macromolecular Crowding Can Do to a Protein, 2014, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 15, pp. 23090-23140. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-553222 issued on Jan. 24, 2025. [cited by applicant]
Sambi et al., “How disorder influences order and vice versa—mutual effects in fusion proteins containing an intrinsically disordered and a globular protein” FEBS Journal (2010), vol. 277, pp. 4438-4451. [cited by applicant]
Al-Husini N et al., α-Proteobacterial RNA Degradosomes Assemble Liquid-Liquid Phase-Separated RNP Bodies, Molecular Cell 71, pp. 1027-1039, Sep. 20, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Ambadipudi et al., Liquid-liquid phase separation of the microtubule-binding repeats of the Alzheimer-related protein Tau, Nature Communications, Aug. 17, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Bakthavachalu et al., RNP-Granule Assembly via Ataxin-2 Disordered Domains is Required for Long-Term Memory and Neurodegeneration, Neuron 98, pp. 754-766, May 16, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Boehning et al., RNA polymerase II clustering through carboxy-terminal domain phase separation, BioRxiv, Jun. 15, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Brady et al., Structural and hydrodynamic properties of an intrinsically disordered region of a germ cell-specific protein on phase separation, PNAS, Sep. 11, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Chong et al., Imaging dynamic and selective low-complexity domain interactions that control gene transcription, Science, Jul. 27, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Chong et al., RGG/RG Motif Regions in RNA Binding and Phase Separation, J Mol Biol., vol. 430, pp. 4650-4665, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Cuevas-Velazquez et al., Organization out of disorder: liquid-liquid phase separation in plant, Science Direct, vol. 45, pp. 68-74, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Cummings et al., Phase Separation Behavior of Supercharged Proteins and Polyelectrolytes, Biochemistry, vol. 57, pp. 314-323, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Cuylen et al., Ki-67 acts as a biological surfactant to disperse mitotic chromosomes, Nature, vol. 535, Jul. 14, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Dao et al., Ubiquitin Modulates Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of UBQLN2 via Disruption of Multivalent Interactions, Molecular Cell, vol. 69, pp. 965-978, Mar. 15, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Darling et al., Intrinsically Disordered Proteome of Human Membrane-Less Organelles, Proteomics, vol. 18, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Dignon et al., Relation between single-molecule properties and phase behavior of intrinsically disordered proteins, PNAS, vol. 115, No. 40, pp. 9929-9934, Oct. 2, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Dignon et al., Sequence determinants of protein phase behavior from a coarse-grained model, PLOS Computational Biology, Jan. 24, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Drino et al., RNAs, Phase Separation, and Membrane-Less Organelles: Are Post-Transcriptional Modifications Modulating Organelle Dynamics? BioEssays, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Dzuricky et al., Convergence of Artificial Protein Polymers and Intrinsically Disordered Proteins, Biochemistry, vol. 57, pp. 2405-2414, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Erdel F & Rippe K. Formation of Chromatin Subcompartments by Phase Separation, Biophysical Journal, vol. 114, pp. 2262-2270, May 22, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Faltova et al., Multifunctional Protein Materials and Microreactors using Low Complexity Domains as Molecular Adhesives, ACS Nano, vol. 12, pp. 9991-9999, 2018. [cited by applicant]
First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 2020800926441 dated Nov. 17, 2025. [cited by applicant]
Fisher et al., A review of metabolic and enzymatic engineering strategies for designing and optimizing performance of microbial cell factories, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, vol. 11, pp. 91-99, 201… [cited by applicant]
Rodriguez et al., Disordered N-Terminal Domain of Human Uracil DNA Glycosylase (hUNG2) Enhances DNA Translocation, ACS Chem. Biol., vol. 12, pp. 2260-2263, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Harmon et al., Intrinsically disordered linkers determine the interplay between phase separation and gelation in multivalent proteins, Cell Biology, Nov. 1, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Heinrich BS et al., Phase Transitions Drive the Formation of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Replication Compartments, mBio., vol. 9, Issue 5, Sep./Oct. 2018. [cited by applicant]
Heyn P et al., Activation of transcription enforces the formation of distinct nuclear bodies in zebrafish embryos, RNA Biology, vol. 14., No. 6, 752-760, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Itakura et al., It Pays To Be in Phase, Biochemistry, vol. 57, pp. 2520-2529, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Maeshima et al., Nucleosomal arrays self-assemble into supramolecular globular structures lacking 30-nm fibers, The EMBO Journal, vol. 35, No. 10, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Kojima & Takayama., Membraneless Compartmentalization Facilitates Enzymatic Cascade Reactions and Reduces Substrate Inhibition, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 10, pp. 32782-32791, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Kosuri and Church, Large-scale de novo DNA synthesis: technologies and applications, Nature Methods, 11, 499-507, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Kulkarni et al., Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: The Dark Horse of the Dark Proteome, Proteomics, vol. 18, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Lee Cf et al., Spatial organization of the cell cytoplasm by position-dependent phase separation, Physical Review Letters, Aug. 23, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., The physical forces mediating self-association and phase-separation in the C-terminal domain of TDP-43, Science Direct, pp. 214-223, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Li, J. et al., Review: a comprehensive summary of a decade development of the recombinase polymerase amplification Analyst, 144, pp. 31-67, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Lin et al., The intrinsically disordered N-terminal domain of galectin-3 dynamically mediates multisite self-association of the protein through fuzzy interactions. [cited by applicant]
Lin et al., Theories for Sequence-Dependent Phase Behaviors of Biomolecular Condensates, Biochemistry, vol. 57, pp. 2499-2508, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Leake M., Transcription factors in eukaryotic cells can functionally regulate gene expression by acting in oligomeric assemblies formed from an intrinsically disordered protein phase transition enabled by molecular crow… [cited by applicant]
Maucuer et al., Microtubules as platforms for probing liquid-liquid phase separation in cells—application to RNA-binding proteins, Journal of Cell Science, vol. 131, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Milavanovic et al., A liquid phase of synapsin and lipid vesicles, Science, Aug. 10, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Mitrea et al., Self-interaction of NPM1 modulates multiple mechanisms of liquid-liquid phase separation, Nature Communications, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Mittag et al., Multiple Modes of Protein-Protein Interactions Promote RNP Granule Assembly, J., Mol. Biol., vol. 430, pp. 4636-4649, Nov. 2, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Monterroso B et al., Microenvironments created by liquid-liquid phase transition control the dynamic distribution of bacterial division FtsZ protein, Scientific Reports, Oct. 11, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Muiznieks et al., Role of Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation in Assembly of Elastin and Other Extracellular Matrix Proteins, J. Mol. Biol., vol. 430, pp. 4741-4753, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Owen et al., CRIB effector disorder: exquisite function from chaos, Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 46, pp. 1289-1302, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Perovic et al., IDPpi: Protein-Protein Interaction Analyses of Human Intrinsically Disordered Proteins, Scientific Reports, vol. 8, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Poudyal et al., Physical Principles and Extant Biology Reveal Roles for RNA-Containing Membraneless Compartments in Origins of Life Chemistry, Biochemistry, vol. 57, pp. 2509-2519, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Protter et al., Intrinsically Disordered Regions Can Contribute Promiscuous Interactions to RNP Granule Assembly, Cell Reports, vol. 22, pp. 1401-1412, Feb. 6, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Qamar et al., FUS Phase Separation is Modulated by a Molecular Chaperone and Methylation of Arginine Cation-π Interactions, Cell, vol. 173, pp. 720-734, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Rauscher et al., The liquid structure of elastin, Biophysics and Structural Biology, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Raut et al., Effect of Excipients on Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation and Aggregation in Dual Variable Domain Immunoglobulin Protein Solutions, Mol. Pharmaceutics, vol. 13, pp. 774-783, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Ruff et al., Advances in Understanding Stimulus-Responsive Phase Behavior of Intrinsically Disordered Protein Polymers, J. Mol. Biol. vol. 430, pp. 4619-4635, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Ryan et al., Mechanistic View of hnRNPA2 Low-Complexity Domain Structure, Interactions, and Phase Separation Altered by Mutation and Arginine Methylation, Molecular Cell, Vo. 69, pp. 465-479, Feb. 1, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Sarkar et al., Single-Molecule and Ensemble Methods to Probe Initial Stages of RNP Granule Assembly, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1814, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Seydoux G, The P Granules of C. elegans: A Genetic Model for the Study of RNA-Protein Condensates, J. Mol. Biol. vol. 430, No. 23, pp. 4702-4710, Nov. 2, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Strom AR et al., Phase separation drives heterochromatin domain formation, Nature, vol. 547, Jul. 13, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Tang, W. et al., “Click” Reactions: a Versatile Toolbox for the Synthesis of Peptide-Conjugates, Chemical Society Reviews, RSC Publishing, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Taylor et al., Biophysical characterization of organelle-based RNA/protein liquid phases using microfluidics, Soft Matter, vol. 12, pp. 9142-9150, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Uversky et al., The roles of intrinsic disorder-based liquid-liquid phase transitions in the “Dr. Jekyll-Mr. Hyde” behavior of proteins involved in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal lobar degeneration, El… [cited by applicant]
Wang L et al., TDP-43 NTD can be induced while CTD is significantly enhanced by ssDNA to undergo liquid-liquid phase separation. [cited by applicant]
Lin et al., Intrinsically disordered sequences enable modulation of protein phase separation through distributed tyrosine motifs, J. Biol. Chem., 2017, vol. 292, No. 46, pp. 19110-19120. [cited by applicant]
Nikolic, J et al., Rabies virus factories are formed by liquid-liquid phase separation, Nouvelle, Mar. 2018, vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 203-205 (with English translation). [cited by applicant]
Sabari, B.R., et al., Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control, Science, Jul. 27, 2018 vol. 361(6400), pp. 1-24. [cited by applicant]
Sabari, B.R., et al., Phase Separation Concentrates Transcription Proteins at Superenhancers, Cancer Discovery, Aug. 2018, American Association for Cancer Research, p. 911. [cited by applicant]
Savitskaya, A. et al., C-terminal intrinsically disordered region-dependent organization of the mycobacterial genome by a histone-like protein, Scientific Reports, 2018, vol. 8, No. 8197, pp. 1-15, www.nature.com/scient… [cited by applicant]
Schuster B. et al., Controllable protein phase separation and modular recruitment to form responsive membraneless organelles, Nature Communications, 2018, vol. 9, No. 2985, pp. 1-12, www.nature.com/ naturecommunications. [cited by applicant]
Shan Z et al., Basal condensation of Numb and Pon complex via phase transition during [cited by applicant]
Shim, Y. et al., “Polycistronic co-expression and non-denaturing purification of histone octamers”, Anal. Biochem, 2012, vol. 427, pp. 190-192. [cited by applicant]
Uebel et al., Distinct regions of the intrinsically disordered protein MUT-16 mediate assembly of a small RNA amplification complex and promote phase separation of Mutator foci. PLOS Genetics, 2018, vol. 14, No. 7, http… [cited by applicant]
Vernon et al., “Pi-Pi contacts are an overlooked protein feature relevant to phase separation”, eLife, 2018, vol. 7, pp. 1-48, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31486. [cited by applicant]
Vieregg J.R. et al., “Oligonucleotide-Peptide Complexes: Phase Control by Hybridization”, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, vol. 140, pp. 1632-1638, ACS Publications. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “A Molecular Grammar Governing the Driving Forces for Phase Separation of Prion-like RNA Binding Proteins”, Cell, Jul. 26, 2018, vol. 174, pp. 688-699. [cited by applicant]
Wegmann, S. et al., “Tau protein liquid-liquid phase separation can initiate tau aggregation”, The EMBO Journal, 2018, vol. 37, pp. 1-21. [cited by applicant]
Wei M.T. et al., “Phase behaviour of disordered proteins underlying low density and high permeability of liquid organelles”, Nature Chemistry, 2017, pp. 1-8. [cited by applicant]
Woodruff et al., “Assembly of Mitotic Structures through Phase Separation”, J. Mol. Biol., 2018, vol. 430, pp. 4762-4772. [cited by applicant]
Yoshizawa T. et al., “Nuclear Import Receptor Inhibits Phase Separation of FUS through Binding to Multiple Sites”, Cell, Apr. 19, 2018, vol. 173, pp. 693-705. [cited by applicant]
Zaslavsky B. et al., “In Aqua Veritas: The Indispensable yet Mostly Ignored Role of Water in Phase Separation and Membrane-less Organelles”, Biochemistry, 2018, vol. 57, pp. 2437-2451. [cited by applicant]
Zaslavsky, B. et al., “The solvent side of proteinaceous membrane-less organelles in light of aqueous two-phase systems”, International Journal of Biological Macromulecules, 2018, vol. 117, pp. 1224-1251. [cited by applicant]
Zhou, J. et al., “NEIL3 Repairs Telomere Damage during S Phase to Secure Chromosome Segregation at Mitosis”, Cell Reports, Aug. 29, 2017, vol. 20, pp. 2044-2056. [cited by applicant]