IP Library Granted Patent US 11,778,094
Granted Patent B2
US 11,778,094 · App. 17/542,914 · Granted Oct 3, 2023

Time tolerant prompt detection

Inventors: Patrick Peterson (Cambridge, MA); Sarah Lynn Hagan (Allen, TX); Laura Jill Kleiman (Arlington, MA)
Assignee: Intrado Corporation
H04M3/5175
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,778,094
App. No.
17/542,914
Granted
Oct 3, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

The location of voice prompts within a call waveform is usually conducted by match filtering a snippet of the prompt (approx. 800 ms) to the call waveform. In an enhanced process that can accommodate transmission errors when detecting voice prompts on lower quality transmission lines, a snippet of a voice prompt may be divided into sniplets, typically 100 ms long. The sniplets can be individually detected. If a sufficient number of sniplets are detected within allowed time tolerances, then this subset of detected sniplets can indicate the presence of the snippet, and thus the associated voice prompt.

Claims (36)

1. A method comprising:

comparing a call waveform to a database of prompt waveform sniplets to generate a set of timestamped sniplets that indicates prompt waveform sniplets that were identified in the call waveform and where in the call waveform the respective prompt waveform sniplets were identified; and

processing the set of timestamped sniplets to determine subsets of the timestamped sniplets that collectively indicate a presence of prompts in the call waveform;

wherein one or more constraints are applied to a subset of the subsets of the timestamped sniplets to determine if the subset indicates the presence of a prompt.

2. The method of claim 1 comprising forming a subset of sniplets if the difference in timestamps of the respective sniplets agree with indicated offsets of the respective sniplets.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the one or more constraints comprises a variance parameter that allows for extended difference in timestamps between sniplets of a subset up to a threshold defined by the variance parameter.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the one or more constraints comprises a count constraint that requires the subset to contain a minimum threshold number of sniplets of a snippet in order for the subset to indicate the presence of a prompt.

5. The method of claim 4 comprising:

processing the set of timestamped sniplets in timestamp order; and

for a sniplet under consideration, when a timestamp difference between the timestamp of the sniplet under consideration and a previous sniplet of the subset is greater than a snippet duration, determining that the subset indicates the presence of a prompt if the subset comprises the minimum threshold number of sniplets.

6. The method of claim 5 comprising, for a first sniplet to be added to a subset, requiring that an offset of the first sniplet relative to the beginning of a snippet allows for the minimum threshold number of sniplets to be subsequently added to the subset.

7. A system comprising:

at least one processer,

at least one memory operatively associated with the at least one processor; and

at least one database; wherein, the at least one database stores a plurality of prompt waveform sniplets;

the at least one processor is programmed to:

compare a call waveform to the plurality of prompt waveform sniplets to generate a set of timestamped sniplets that indicates prompt waveform sniplets that were identified in the call waveform and where in the call waveform the respective prompt waveform sniplets were identified; and

process the set of timestamped sniplets to determine subsets of the timestamped sniplets that collectively indicate a presence of prompts in the call waveform;

wherein one or more constraints are applied to a subset of the subsets of the timestamped sniplets to determine if the subset indicates the presence of a prompt.

8. The system of claim 7 wherein the one or more constraints comprise at least one timing constraint and wherein the at least one processor is programmed to form a subset of sniplets if the difference in timestamps of the respective sniplets agree with indicated offsets of the respective sniplets.

9. The system of claim 8 wherein the at least one timing constraint includes a variance parameter that allows for extended difference in timestamps between sniplets of a subset up to a threshold defined by the variance parameter.

10. The system of claim 7 wherein the one or more constraints comprises a count constraint that requires the subset to contain a minimum threshold number of sniplets of a snippet in order for the subset to indicate the presence of a prompt.

11. The system of claim 10 wherein the at least one processor is programmed to:

process the set of timestamped sniplets in timestamp order; and

for a sniplet under consideration, when a timestamp difference between the timestamp of the sniplet under consideration and a previous sniplet of the subset is greater than a snippet duration, determine that the subset indicates the presence of a prompt if the subset comprises the minimum threshold number of sniplets.

12. The system of claim 11 wherein the at least one processor is programmed to require, for a first sniplet to be added to a subset, an offset of the first sniplet relative to the beginning of a snippet allows for the minimum threshold number of sniplets to be subsequently added to the subset.

13. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions, that when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform identifying the presence of prompts in a call waveform comprising:

comparing the call waveform to a database of prompt waveform sniplets to generate a set of timestamped sniplets that indicates prompt waveform sniplets that were identified in the call waveform and where in the call waveform the respective prompt waveform sniplets were identified; and

processing the set of timestamped sniplets to determine subsets of the timestamped sniplets that collectively indicate a presence of prompts in the call waveform;

wherein one or more constraints are applied to a subset of the subsets of the timestamped sniplets to determine if the subset indicates the presence of a prompt.

14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13 comprising instructions that, when executed, cause the at least one processor to perform forming a subset of sniplets if the difference in timestamps of the respective sniplets agree with indicated offsets of the respective sniplets.

15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14 wherein the one or more constraints comprises a variance parameter that allows for extended difference in timestamps between sniplets of a subset up to a threshold defined by the variance parameter.

16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13 wherein the one or more constraints comprises a count constraint that requires the subset to contain a minimum threshold number of sniplets of a snippet in order for the subset to indicate the presence of a prompt.

17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16 comprising instructions that, when executed, cause the at least one processor to perform:

processing the set of timestamped sniplets in timestamp order; and

for a sniplet under consideration, when a timestamp difference between the timestamp of the sniplet under consideration and a previous sniplet of the subset is greater than a snippet duration, determining that the subset indicates the presence of a prompt if the subset comprises the minimum threshold number of sniplets.

Assignments (5)
OMNIBUS ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Recorded Nov 25, 2024
From: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH (AS SUCCESSOR TO CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH IN ITS CAPACITY AS COLLATERAL AGENT)
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS THE SUCCESSOR COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 069438/0775 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 26, 2023
From: INTRADO CORPORATION
To: WEST TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC
Reel/Frame 064103/0774 →
NOTICE OF GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST (SECOND LIEN) IN PATENTS Recorded Jan 31, 2023
From: CX360, INC.; WEST TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC (FKA INTRADO CORPORATION, FKA WEST CORPORATION); INTRADO INTERACTIVE SERVICES CORPORATION (FKA WEST INTERACTIVE SERVICES CORPORATION, FKA COBALT ACQUISITION COMPANY)
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 062571/0018 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 22, 2022
From: INTRADO CORPORATION (F/K/A WEST CORPORATION)
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 061183/0494 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2021
From: PETERSON, PATRICK; HAGAN, SARAH LYNN; KLEIMAN, LAURA JILL
To: INTRADO CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 058307/0601 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230188645A1 · Jun 15, 2023