IP Library Granted Patent US 12,239,850
Granted Patent B2
US 12,239,850 · App. 17/678,415 · Granted Mar 4, 2025

Generating time-efficient treatment field trajectories for external-beam radiation treatments

Inventors: Santtu Ollila (Helsinki, FI); Mikko Vainio (Espoo, FI); Jarkko Peltola (Tuusula, FI); Janne Nord (Espoo, FI); Esa Kuusela (Espoo, FI); Juha Kauppinen (Espoo, FI); Viljo Petäjä (Espoo, FI); Marko Rusanen (Espoo, FI)
Assignee: Siemens Healthineers International AG
A61N5/1042A61N5/1031A61N5/1039A61N5/1045A61N5/1047
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,239,850
App. No.
17/678,415
Granted
Mar 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

In a radiation treatment plan that includes a plurality of treatment fields of multiple treatment modalities, such as IMRT modality and dynamic treatment path modality (e.g., VMAT and conformal arc therapy), an optimized spatial point sequence may be determined that optimizes the total treatment time, which includes both the beam-on time (i.e., during the delivery of radiation dose) and the beam-off time (i.e., during transitions between consecutive treatment fields). The result is a time-ordered field trajectory that intermixes and interleaves different treatment fields. In one embodiment, a dynamic treatment path may be cut into a plurality of sections, and one or more IMRT fields may be inserted between the plurality of sections.

Claims (70)

1. A computer-implemented method of determining a treatment field trajectory for delivering a desired dose of radiation to a treatment volume within a patient using an external-beam radiation treatment system, the method comprising:

receiving a radiation treatment plan, the radiation treatment plan including a plurality of treatment fields, each of the plurality of treatment fields having a respective set of values for treatment axes of the external-beam radiation treatment system;

identifying, using a computer system, a plurality of candidate treatment trajectories by analyzing the respective set of values for the treatment axes associated with the plurality of treatment fields, each of the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories comprising a chronological order of administering the plurality of treatment fields, including interleaving the plurality of treatment fields; and

for each of the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories:

determining, using the computer system, a total treatment time including beam-on time when radiation dose is being delivered and beam-off time during transitioning of the treatment axes between consecutive treatment fields;

selecting, using the computer system, an optimal treatment field trajectory among the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories to achieve an optimal total treatment time; and

updating the radiation treatment plan using the optimal treatment field trajectory, wherein the radiation treatment plan is to be used by the external-beam radiation treatment system for delivering the desired dose of radiation.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective set of values for treatment axes includes a first set of values for the treatment axes for loading the patient into a couch, and a second set of values for the treatment axes for unloading the patient off the couch, and wherein identifying the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories is performed by analyzing the first set of values and the second set of values of the treatment axes associated with loading the patient into the couch and unloading the patient off the couch, respectively.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the radiation treatment plan further includes one or more imaging sessions; and

identifying the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories comprises:

for each of the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories,

determining a respective set of values for the treatment axes for each imaging session; and

determining a chronological order of administering the plurality of treatment fields and the one or more imaging sessions.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the radiation treatment plan includes dynamic treatment path modality that comprises volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the respective set of values for treatment axes further includes a third set of values for the treatment axes for imaging the patient, and wherein identifying the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories is performed by analyzing the third set of values for the treatment axes associated with imaging the patient.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the plurality of treatment fields includes an intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) field and a VMAT field, the IMRT field having a first spatial point associated with a first set of values for the treatment axes, and the VMAT field having a treatment path defined by a start spatial point and an end spatial point, the start spatial point associated with a start set of values for the treatment axes, and the end spatial point associated with an end set of values for the treatment axes.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein:

identifying the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories comprises identifying a plurality of intermediate spatial points along the treatment path of the VMAT field, each of the plurality of intermediate spatial points dividing the treatment path into a first section and a second section, and each of the plurality of intermediate spatial points associated with a respective intermediate set of values for the treatment axes;

determining the total treatment time comprises:

determining a transition time for changing the treatment axes from the respective intermediate set of values to the first set of values and changing from the first set of values back to the respective intermediate set of values;

determining a beam-on time for administering the IMRT field and the VMAT field; and

determining the total treatment time by computing a sum of the beam-on time and the transition time; and

selecting the optimal treatment field trajectory comprises:

selecting an optimal intermediate spatial point among the plurality of intermediate spatial points to achieve the optimal total treatment time; and

selecting the optimal treatment field trajectory having a chronological order such that the IMRT field is administered between administering the first section of the VMAT field and administering the second section of the VMAT field.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein selecting the optimal treatment field trajectory comprises determining a direction of traversal of the treatment path of the VMAT field.

9. The method of claim 6 , wherein the radiation treatment plan further includes a second spatial point for imaging the patient, the second spatial point having a second set of values for the treatment axes, and wherein:

identifying the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories comprises identifying, using the computer system, a plurality of intermediate spatial points along the treatment path of the VMAT field, each intermediate spatial point dividing the treatment path into a first section and a second section, and each intermediate spatial point associated with a respective intermediate set of values for the treatment axes;

determining the total treatment time for each of the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories comprises:

determining a transition time for changing the treatment axes from the respective intermediate spatial point to the second spatial point and changing the treatment axes from the second spatial point back to the intermediate spatial point; and

determining the total treatment time including the transition time; and

selecting the optimal treatment field trajectory comprises:

selecting an optimal intermediate spatial point among the plurality of intermediate spatial points to achieve the optimal total treatment time; and

selecting the optimal treatment field trajectory having a chronological order such that the patient is imaged between administering the first section of the VMAT field and administering the second section of the VMAT field.

10. The method of claim 7 , wherein the first spatial point of the IMRT field is not on the treatment path of the VMAT field.

11. A computer product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium storing a plurality of instructions that when executed control a computer system to determine a treatment field trajectory for delivering a desired dose of radiation to a treatment volume within a patient using an external-beam radiation treatment system, the instructions comprising:

receiving a radiation treatment plan, the radiation treatment plan including a plurality of treatment fields, each of the plurality of treatment fields having a respective set of values for treatment axes of the external-beam radiation treatment system;

identifying, using a computer system, a plurality of candidate treatment trajectories by analyzing the respective set of values for the treatment axes associated with the plurality of treatment fields, each of the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories comprising a chronological order of administering the plurality of treatment fields, including interleaving the plurality of treatment fields; and

for each of the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories:

determining, using the computer system, a total treatment time including beam-on time when radiation dose is being delivered and beam-off time during transitioning of the treatment axes between consecutive treatment fields;

selecting, using the computer system, an optimal treatment field trajectory among the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories to achieve an optimal total treatment time; and

updating the radiation treatment plan using the optimal treatment field trajectory, wherein the radiation treatment plan is to be used by the external-beam radiation treatment system for delivering the desired dose of radiation.

12. The computer product of claim 11 , wherein the respective set of values for treatment axes includes a first set of values for the treatment axes for loading the patient into a couch, and a second set of values for the treatment axes for unloading the patient off the couch, and wherein identifying the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories is performed by analyzing the first set of values and the second set of values of the treatment axes associated with loading the patient into the couch and unloading the patient off the couch, respectively.

13. The computer product of claim 11 , wherein:

the radiation treatment plan further includes one or more imaging sessions; and

identifying the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories comprises:

for each candidate treatment trajectory, determining a respective set of values for the treatment axes for each imaging session; and

determining a chronological order of administering the plurality of treatment fields and the one or more imaging sessions.

14. The computer product of claim 11 , wherein the radiation treatment plan includes dynamic treatment path modality that comprises volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

15. The computer product of claim 12 , wherein the radiation treatment plan further includes a third set of values for the treatment axes for imaging the patient, and wherein identifying the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories is performed by analyzing the third set of values for the treatment axes associated with imaging the patient.

16. The computer product of claim 15 , wherein the plurality of treatment fields includes an intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) field and a VMAT field, the IMRT field having a first spatial point associated with a first set of values for the treatment axes, and the VMAT field having a treatment path defined by a start spatial point and an end spatial point, the start spatial point associated with a start set of values for the treatment axes, and the end spatial point associated with an end set of values for the treatment axes.

17. The computer product of claim 16 , wherein:

identifying the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories comprises identifying a plurality of intermediate spatial points along the treatment path of the VMAT field, each of the plurality of intermediate spatial points dividing the treatment path into a first section and a second section, and each of the plurality of intermediate spatial points associated with a respective intermediate set of values for the treatment axes;

determining the total treatment time comprises:

determining a transition time for changing the treatment axes from the respective intermediate set of values to the first set of values and changing from the first set of values back to the respective intermediate set of values;

determining a beam-on time for administering the IMRT field and the VMAT field; and

determining the total treatment time by computing a sum of the beam-on time and the transition time; and

selecting the optimal treatment field trajectory comprises:

selecting an optimal intermediate spatial point among the plurality of intermediate spatial points to achieve the optimal total treatment time; and

selecting the optimal treatment field trajectory having a chronological order such that the IMRT field is administered between administering the first section of the VMAT field and administering the second section of the VMAT field.

18. The computer product of claim 16 , wherein selecting the optimal treatment field trajectory comprises determining a direction of traversal of the treatment path of the VMAT field.

19. The computer product of claim 16 , wherein the radiation treatment plan further includes a second spatial point for imaging the patient, the second spatial point having a second set of values for the treatment axes, and wherein:

identifying the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories comprises identifying, using the computer system, a plurality of intermediate spatial points along the treatment path of the VMAT field, each intermediate spatial point dividing the treatment path into a first section and a second section, and each intermediate spatial point associated with a respective intermediate set of values for the treatment axes;

determining the total treatment time for each of the plurality of candidate treatment trajectories comprises:

determining a transition time for changing the treatment axes from the respective intermediate spatial point to the second spatial point and changing the treatment axes from the second spatial point back to the intermediate spatial point; and

determining the total treatment time including the transition time; and selecting the optimal treatment field trajectory comprises:

selecting an optimal intermediate spatial point among the plurality of intermediate spatial points to achieve the optimal total treatment time; and

selecting the optimal treatment field trajectory having a chronological order such that the patient is imaged between administering the first section of the VMAT field and administering the second section of the VMAT field.

20. The computer product of claim 17 , wherein the first spatial point of the IMRT field is not on the treatment path of the VMAT field.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 8, 2024
From: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 069132/0622 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2022
From: OLLILA, SANTTU; VAINIO, MIKKO; PELTOLA, JARKKO; NORD, JANNE; KUUSELA, ESA; KAUPPINEN, JUHA; PETÄJÄ, VILJO; RUSANEN, MARKO
To: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 059077/0346 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16356804 · Mar 18, 2019
Division 15269870 · Sep 19, 2016
Related Publication 20220176160A1 · Jun 9, 2022
References Cited (31)
US 9844684B2 · Luan · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10213621B2 · Bush · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10272264B2 · Ollila · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10307615B2 · Ollila · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11285339B2 · Ollila · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20080240348A1 · Kamath · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080242969A1 · Sayeh · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080298550A1 · Otto · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20100219356A1 · Bzdusek · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100303205A1 · Kapoor · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100329422A1 · Brown · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110091014A1 · Siljamaki · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110293067A1 · Stahl · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120004518A1 · D'Souza · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130142310A1 · Fahimian · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130178688A1 · Nordstrom · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140107390A1 · Brown · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140330065A1 · Vilsmeier · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20170354832A1 · Bush · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180078789A1 · Ollila · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190209863A1 · Ollila · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 2266664A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
IN 103706044A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018050883A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Gevaert et al., “Implementation of Hybridarc Treatment Technique in Preoperative Radiotherapy of Rectal Cancer: Dose Patterns in Target Lesions and Organs at Risk as Compared to Helical Tornotherapy and Rapidarc”, Radia… [cited by applicant]
Matuszak et al., “FusionArc optimization: A hybrid Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Planning Strategy”, Medical Physics, vol. 40, No. 7, Jul. 2013, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/EP2017/073422, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, mailed Jan. 4, 2018, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/269,870, “Restriction Requirement”, dated Aug. 8, 2018, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/269,870, “Notice of Allowance”, dated Jan. 14, 2019, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
McNiven, Andrea L. et al.; A new metric for assessing IMRT modulation complexity and plan deliverability; Med. Phys. 37 (2), Feb. 2010, pp. 505-515. [cited by applicant]
Park, So-Yeon et al.; Texture analysis on the fluence map to evaluate the degree of modulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy; Med. Phys. 41 (11), Nov. 2014; pp. 111718-1 to 111718-16. [cited by applicant]