IP Library Granted Patent US 12,370,743
Granted Patent B2
US 12,370,743 · App. 17/815,398 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

Calibration systems and methods for additive manufacturing systems with multiple image projection

Inventors: Ben Wynne (Escondido, CA); Ivan Dejesus Chousal (Chula Vista, CA); Christopher Sean Tanner (Idyllwild, CA); Robert Lee Mueller (San Diego, CA); James Michael Pingel (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: Intrepid Automation, Inc.
B29C64/268B29C64/129B29C64/135B29C64/291B33Y10/00B33Y30/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,370,743
App. No.
17/815,398
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure provides techniques for calibration systems and methods for additive manufacturing systems with multiple image projection. In some embodiments, a method of calibrating two or more image projectors of a photoreactive 3D printing system (PRPS) includes: projecting a sub-image from each of the two or more image projectors; measuring light from an image projector using a light sensor of a calibration system; receiving a signal from the light sensor; processing information from the light sensor; and changing a parameter of a sub-image based on the processed information. In some cases, a PRPS includes a calibration fixture comprising the light sensor. In some cases, a PRPS can be calibrated using a modular calibration fixture comprising the light sensor, wherein the modular calibration fixture can be coupled to the PRPS, leveled and height adjusted, and then a calibration routine can be performed.

Claims (26)

1. A method of calibrating three or more image projectors of a photoreactive 3D printing system (PRPS), the method comprising:

projecting a sub-image from each of the three or more image projectors to form an array of sub-images in a build area of the PRPS, wherein the three or more image projectors are controlled by an image display subsystem, wherein the three or more image projectors are each stationary, wherein a first image projector of the three or more image projectors faces the build area and projects a sub-image directly onto the build area, and wherein a second image projector of the three or more image projectors faces a bounce mirror that redirects light from the second image projector onto the build area;

positioning a calibration fixture having a light sensor such that the light sensor lines up with a position of a sub-image in the array of sub-images, wherein the calibration fixture further comprises a movement system coupled to the light sensor, wherein the movement system moves the light sensor to different positions that line up with positions of the sub-images of the array of sub-images;

measuring light from an image projector of the three or more image projectors using the light sensor;

receiving a first signal from the light sensor using the image display subsystem;

processing information from the light sensor using the image display subsystem; and

sending a second signal from the image display subsystem to the image projector of the three or more image projectors to change a parameter of the sub-image in the array of sub-images based on the processed information.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the parameter of the sub-image in the array of sub-images is a position, an intensity, an intensity distribution, an irradiance, an irradiance distribution, a size, an amount of zoom, a focus, an edge-blending parameter, a gamma, a skew, or a warp.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the measuring light from an image protector of the three or more image projectors using the light sensor further comprises moving the light sensor such that the light sensor measures light at two or more locations within an X-Y area of the photoreactive 3D printing system (PRPS), wherein the X-Y area is approximately registered with at least a portion of the build area.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the calibration fixture comprises a plurality of light sensors that are moved across the X-Y area, and information from the plurality of light sensors is used by the image display subsystem to change the parameter.

5. A photoreactive 3D printing system (PRPS) comprising:

a resin vat comprising a build area;

three or more image projectors each configured to project a sub-image onto the build area, wherein the three or more image projectors are each stationary, wherein a first image projector of the three or more image projectors faces the build area and is configured to project a sub-image directly onto the build area, and wherein a second image projector of the three or more image projectors faces a bounce mirror configured to redirect light from the second image projector onto the build area;

a calibration fixture comprising a light sensor configured to measure light from the three or more image projectors, wherein the light sensor lines up with a position of a sub-image of the three or more sub-images; and

an image display subsystem in communication with the calibration fixture and the three or more image projectors,

wherein the calibration fixture further comprises a movement system coupled to the light sensor, wherein the movement system is configured to move the light sensor to different positions that line up with positions of the sub-images of the three or more sub-images.

6. The photoreactive 3D printing system (PRPS) of claim 5 , wherein the light sensor faces the first image projector.

7. The photoreactive 3D printing system (PRPS) of claim 5 , wherein the light sensor is positioned in a plane of the build area.

8. The photoreactive 3D printing system (PRPS) of claim 5 , wherein the light sensor is configured to detect projected light from an image projector of the three or more image projectors without the projected light reflecting off of a calibration surface or calibration feature.

9. The photoreactive 3D printing system (PRPS) of claim 5 , wherein the light sensor is configured to detect light from the bounce mirror without the light from the bounce mirror reflecting off of a calibration surface or calibration feature.

10. The photoreactive 3D printing system (PRPS) of claim 5 , wherein the image display subsystem is configured to receive a first signal from the light sensor, process information from the light sensor using a controller or processor, and send a second signal to an image projector of the three or more image projectors to change a parameter of the sub-image of the three or more sub-images.

11. The photoreactive 3D printing system (PRPS) of claim 10 , wherein the parameter of the sub-image of the three or more sub-images is a position, an intensity, an intensity distribution, an irradiance, an irradiance distribution, a size, an amount of zoom, a focus, an edge-blending parameter, a gamma, a skew, or a warp.

12. The photoreactive 3D printing system (PRPS) of claim 5 , wherein the calibration fixture further comprises a plurality of light sensors that are coupled to the movement system.

13. The photoreactive 3D printing system (PRPS) of claim 5 , wherein the calibration fixture further comprises linear stages and Z motors configured to move the calibration fixture with respect to the resin vat to maintain levelness with a top surface of resin in the resin vat.

14. The photoreactive 3D printing system (PRPS) of claim 5 , wherein the movement system comprises a first linear motor configured to move the light sensor in an X direction that is approximately parallel to a plane of the build area.

15. The photoreactive 3D printing system (PRPS) of claim 14 , wherein the movement system comprises a second linear motor oriented approximately perpendicular to the first linear motor, wherein the first and second linear motors are configured to move the light sensor in the X direction and in a Y direction, wherein the Y direction is approximately parallel to the plane of the build area and is approximately perpendicular to the X direction.

Assignments (3)
MERGER Recorded Jan 9, 2024
From: INTREPID AUTOMATION
To: INTREPID AUTOMATION, INC.
Reel/Frame 066242/0218 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 13, 2023
From: INTREPID AUTOMATION, INC.
To: MASON M. EVANS FAMILY TRUST
Reel/Frame 065211/0557 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 10, 2022
From: WYNNE, BEN; CHOUSAL, IVAN DEJESUS; TANNER, CHRISTOPHER SEAN; MUELLER, ROBERT LEE; PINGEL, JAMES MICHAEL
To: INTREPID AUTOMATION
Reel/Frame 060775/0076 →
Continuity (8)
Continuation In Part 17661856 · May 3, 2022
Continuation 17301204 · Mar 29, 2021
Continuation 16938298 · Jul 24, 2020
Continuation 16370337 · Mar 29, 2019
Provisional Application 63203752 · Jul 29, 2021
Provisional Application 62734003 · Sep 20, 2018
Provisional Application 62711719 · Jul 30, 2018
Related Publication 20220355548A1 · Nov 10, 2022
References Cited (88)
US 4575330A · Hull · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 5258146A · Almquist et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5554336A · Hull · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5569431A · Hull · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5902537A · Almquist et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6416185B1 · Smith · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6456339B1 · Surati et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6616263B2 · Allen et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6652061B2 · Allen et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6916079B2 · Allen et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7079157B2 · Deering · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7215362B2 · Klose · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7270426B2 · Miyazawa · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7318718B2 · Ueno · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7443364B2 · Damera-Venkata et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7559658B2 · Kamiya et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7742011B2 · Damera-Venkata et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7907792B2 · Harville · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8142026B2 · Aufranc et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8666142B2 · Shkolnik et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8766998B1 · Morgan, III et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9453142B2 · Rolland et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9497447B2 · Green et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9914266B2 · Ueda et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9930307B1 · Kursula et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10532554B2 · Tanner · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10647055B2 · Wynne et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10723078B2 · Cooper · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10773510B2 · Wynne et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11054808B2 · Wynne et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11584085B2 · Wynne et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11760032B2 · Tanner · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20070104361A1 · Alexander · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080169586A1 · Hull et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100271608A1 · Schlienger et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20140140627A1 · Wu et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140226167A1 · Smith et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150137426A1 · Esbroeck et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150147424A1 · Bibas · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150202805A1 · Saruhashi et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160121547A1 · Kobayashi · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160368221A1 · Ueda et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170102679A1 · Greene et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170283766A1 · Hribar et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170318186A1 · Morovic et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180139426A1 · Ueda · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180236710A1 · Turner · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180322621A1 · Craeghs et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180345594A1 · Tanner · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190118481A1 · Brown · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190134899A1 · Mueller et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190210289A1 · Frantzdale et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200001541A1 · Eiriksson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200292415A1 · Goldman et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210016394A1 · McCarthy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
AU 2008243078A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 104015363A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104669621A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 104669625A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 205238580U · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 104015363B · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 106273487A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016179661A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017165832A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017210298A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018097954A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 11, 2022 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/IB2022/056959. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 3, 2022 for European Patent Application No. 19843981.2. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report dated Nov. 8, 2019 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/43305. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance and Fees dated Jan. 28, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/301,204. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 15, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,298. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 29, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/370,337. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/370,337. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,298. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/301,204. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2022 for China Patent Application No. 201980051272.5. [cited by applicant]
Bimber et al, “Multifocal projection: a multiprojector technique for increasing focal depth,” in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 658-667, Jul.-Aug. 2006, doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2… [cited by applicant]
Brown and Lowe, “Automatic panoramic image stitching using invariant features.” International journal of computer vision, 74 (Aug. 2007): 59-73. [cited by applicant]
Camano et al “Materials characterization for stereolithography.” High Value Manufacturing: Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advanced Research in Virt… [cited by applicant]
Garcia-Dorado and Cooperstock, “Fully automatic multi-projector calibration with an uncalibrated camera,” CVPR 2011 Workshops, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, Jul. 2011, pp. 29-36, doi: 10.1109/CVPRW.2011.5981726. [cited by applicant]
Harville et al, “Practical Methods for Geometric and Photometric Correction of Tiled Projector,” 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'06), New York, NY, USA, Jul. 2006, pp. 5-5, doi… [cited by applicant]
Jacobs, Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing, Fundamentals of StereoLithography (1992), Chapters 2, 10, and 11. [cited by applicant]
Lewis, Applied Optimal Control & Estimation (1992), Chapter 1. [cited by applicant]
Majumber er al. Practical Multi-Projector Display Design (2007), Chapters 1-4, B and C. [cited by applicant]
Quang, et al, “Auto-focusing technique in a projector-camera system,” 2008 10th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision, Hanoi, Dec. 2008, pp. 1914-1919, doi: 10.1109/ICARCV.2008.4795821. [cited by applicant]
Song et al, “A new edge blending paradigm for multi-projector tiled display wall,” 2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM 2010), Taiyuan, Oct. 2010, pp. V5-349-V5-352, doi: 10.… [cited by applicant]
Xu et al., “Influence of recoating parameters on thickness of resin layer in high-resolution stereolithography system.” Advanced Materials Research 189 (Feb. 2011): 3697-3700. [cited by applicant]
Zhou et al “Parametric process optimization to improve the accuracy of rapid prototyped stereolithography parts.” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 40.3 (Feb. 2000): 363-379. [cited by applicant]