IP Library Granted Patent US 12,291,797
Granted Patent B2
US 12,291,797 · App. 17/932,117 · Granted May 6, 2025

Fibronectin type III domain based scaffold compositions, methods and uses

Inventors: Steven Jacobs (North Wales, PA); Karyn O'Neil (Media, PA)
Assignee: Janssen Biotech, Inc.
C40B40/10C07K14/78C40B40/08C40B50/06
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,291,797
App. No.
17/932,117
Granted
May 6, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A protein scaffold based on a consensus sequence of fibronectin type III (FN3) proteins, such as the tenth FN3 repeat from human fibronectin (human Tenascin), including isolated nucleic acids that encode a protein scaffold, vectors, host cells, and methods of making and using thereof have applications in diagnostic and/or therapeutic compositions, methods and devices. In particular, protein scaffold molecules binding to IgG have been identified as useful for diagnostic and/or therapeutic applications.

Claims (10)

1. An isolated protein scaffold based on a fibronectin type III (FN3) domain comprising:

a backbone portion having an amino acid sequence identical to SEQ ID NO:16 at residues 1-21, 29-74, and 82-89;

a B:C loop portion between residues 21 and 29 of SEQ ID NO:16 having at least 75% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOS:21-45; and

an F:G loop portion between residues 74 and 82 of SEQ ID NO:16 having at least 75% identity to any one of SEQ ID NOS:46-140, wherein the protein scaffold is capable of binding to human IgG.

2. The protein scaffold of claim 1 , comprising:

a backbone portion having an amino acid sequence identical to SEQ ID NO:16 at residues 1-21, 29-74, and 82-89;

a B:C loop portion between residues 21 and 29 of SEQ ID NO:16 comprising any one of SEQ ID NOS:21-45; and

an F:G loop portion between residues 74 and 82 of SEQ ID NO:16 comprising any one of SEQ ID NOS:46-140, wherein the protein scaffold is capable of binding to human IgG.

3. The protein scaffold of claim 1 , wherein said scaffold binds a target with at least one affinity selected from a K D of less than or equal to 10 −9 M, less than or equal to 10 −10 M, less than or equal to 10 −11 M, less than or equal to 10 −12 M, less than or equal to 10 −13 M, less than or equal to 10 −14 M, and less than or equal to 10 −15 M, as determined by surface plasmon resonance or the Kinexa method.

4. The protein scaffold of claim 2 , wherein the loops form sites for binding to IgG.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 14, 2022
From: JACOBS, STEVEN; O'NEIL, KARYN
To: CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH INC.
Reel/Frame 061094/0652 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 14, 2022
From: CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH INC.
To: JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC.
Reel/Frame 061433/0756 →
Continuity (7)
Division 16860613 · Apr 28, 2020
Continuation 16032691 · Jul 11, 2018
Division 14921589 · Oct 23, 2015
Division 13595484 · Aug 27, 2012
Division 12606382 · Oct 27, 2009
Provisional Application 61110120 · Oct 31, 2008
Related Publication 20230071749A1 · Mar 9, 2023
References Cited (96)
US 5643768A · Kawasaki · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6018030A · Ferrari · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6355776B1 · Ferrari · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6462189B1 · Koide · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6521427B1 · Evans · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6673901B2 · Koide · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6703199B1 · Koide · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6818418B1 · Lipovsek · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6846655B1 · Wagner · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7078490B2 · Koide · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7115396B2 · Lipovsek · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7119171B2 · Koide · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7153661B2 · Koide · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7842476B2 · McGregor · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8278419B2 · Jacobs · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20040259781A1 · Chiquet-Ehrismann · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050255548A1 · Lipovsek · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060040278A1 · Cojocaru · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060246059A1 · Lipovsek · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060270604A1 · Lipovsek · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070148126A1 · Chen · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070160533A1 · Chen · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070184476A1 · Hsieh · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080220049A1 · Chen · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090176654A1 · Cappuccilli · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100144601A1 · Jacobs · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100216708A1 · Jacobs · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100255056A1 · Jacobs · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110038866A1 · Hastewell · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110124527A1 · Cappuccilli · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110274623A1 · Jacobs · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CA 2293632A1 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
CA 2418835A1 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
EP 1266025A1 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
EP 0985039B1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
EP 1137941B1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 0164942A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 0204523 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO 0232925A2 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO 03104418A2 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004029224A2 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004058821A2 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 2005056754A2 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 2007085815A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008079973A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008156642A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009023184A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009058379A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009086116A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009133208A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010051274A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010060095A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011005133A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012016245A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
Koide et al., “Monobodies: antibody mimics based on the scaffold of the fibronectin type III domain,” Methods Mol. Biol. 352:95-109 (2007) Abstract Only. [cited by applicant]
Alexey Teplyakov et al, “C-terminal [beta]-strand swapping in a consensus-derived fibronectin Type III scaffold”, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, US, (Feb. 12, 2014), vol. 82, No. 7, doi:10.1002/prot.… [cited by applicant]
Bass et al., “Hormone Phage: An Enrichment Method for Variant Proteins with Altered Binding Properties,” Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 8: 309-314 (1990). [cited by applicant]
Binz et al, “Engineered proteins as spedific binding reagents”, Current opinion in Biotchnology, 16, pp. 459-469, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Binz et al., “High-affinity binders selected from designed ankyrin repeat protein libraries,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 575-585 (May 2004). [cited by applicant]
Bork et al., “Proposed acquisition of an animal protein domain by bacteria”, Proc. Natl. Acad, Sci, vol. 89, pp. 8990-8994, Oct. 1992. [cited by applicant]
C.N. Pace, “Determination and Analysis of Urea and Guanidine Hydrochloride Denaturation Curves,” Methods in Enzymology, 131: 266-280 (1986). [cited by applicant]
Clarke et al., “Folding and Stability of a Fibronectin Type III Domain of Human Tenascin,” Journal of Molecular Biology, 270: 771-778 (1997). [cited by applicant]
Dehouck, et al., “Fast and accurate predictions of protein stability changes upon mutations using statistical potentials and neural networks: PoPMuSiC-2.0,” Bioinformatics, 25(19): 2537-2543 (2009). [cited by applicant]
Diem et al., “Selection of high-affinity Centyrin FN3 domains from a simple library diversified at a combination of strand and loop positions”, Protein Engineering, Design and Selection, vol. 27, No. 10, pp. 419-429, (2… [cited by applicant]
Dineen et al., “The Adnectin CT-322 is a novel VEGF receptor 2 inhibitor that decreases tumor burden in an orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic cancer,” BMC Cancer, 8: 352-361 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Dutta et al., “High-affinity fragment complementation of a fibronectin type III domain and its application to stability enhancement”, Protein Sci., (2005), vol. 14, No. 11, pp. 2838-2848, XP009154599. [cited by applicant]
European Search Report for App. No. EP16176749 dated Oct. 24, 2016 and sent by agent Nov. 2, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Garrard et al., “Selection of an anti-IGF-1 Fab from a Fab phage library created by mutagenesis of multiple CDR loops,” Gene, 128:103-109 (1993). [cited by applicant]
GenBank Accession No. NP 002151, (2013). [cited by applicant]
Getmanova et al., “Antagonists to Human and Mouse Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 Generated by Directed Protein Evolution in Vitro,” Chemistry & Biology, 13: 549-556 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Hackel et al., “Picomolar Affinity Fibronectin Domains Engineered Utilizing Loop Length Diversity, Recursive Mutagenesis, and Loop Shuffling,” Journal of Molecular Biology, 381: 1238-1252 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Hackel et al., “Stability and CDR Composition Biases Enrich Binder Functionality Landscapes,” Journal of Molecular Biology, 401: 84-96 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Hanes et al., “In vitro selection and evolution of the functional proteins by using ribosome display”, Proc Natl. Acad. Sci,. USA, vol. 94, pp. 4937-4942, May 1997. [cited by applicant]
Jacobs et al., “Design of novel FN3 domains with high stability by a consensus sequence approach”, Protein Engineering Design & Selection, vol. 25, No. 3,, pp. 107-117, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Jain, et al., “Designing Protein Denaturants: Synthetic Agents Induce Cytochrome c Unfolding at Low concentrations and Stoichiometries,” Agnew. Chem., 114(4): 663-665 (2002). [cited by applicant]
Jones et al., “A cDNA clone for cytotactin contains sequences similar to epidermal growth factor-like repeats and segments of fibronectin and fibrinogen”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 85, pp. 2186-2190, Apr. 1988. [cited by applicant]
Karatan, et al., “Molecular Recognition Properties of FN3 Monobodies that Bind the Src SH3 Domain,” Chemistry & Biology, 11: 835-844 (2004). [cited by applicant]
Knappik, et al., “Fully Synthetic Human Combinatorial Antibody Libraries (HuCAL) Based on Modular Consensus Frameworks and CDRs Randomized with Trinucleotides,” Journal of Molecular Biology, 296: 57-86 (2002). [cited by applicant]
Koide et al., “High-affinity single-domain binding proteins with a binary-code interface,” PNAS, vol. 104, No. 16, pp. 6632-6637 (Apr. 17, 2007). [cited by applicant]
Koide, et al., “Teaching an Old Scaffold New Tricks: Monobodies Constructed Using Alternative Surfaces of the FN3 Scaffold”, Journal of Molecular Biology, Academic Press, vol. 415, No. 3, pp. 393-405 (2011). [cited by applicant]
Koide, et al., “The Fibronectin Type III Domain as a Scaffold for Novel Binding Proteins,” Journal of Molecular Biology, 284(4): 1141-1151 (1998). [cited by applicant]
Kunkel, et al., “Rapid and Efficient Site-Specific Mutagenesis without Phenotypic Selection,” Methods Enzymology, 154: 367-382 (1987). [cited by applicant]
Lehmann et al., “Engineering proteins for theromostability: the use of sequence alignments versus rational design and directed evolution”, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 12, pp. 371-375, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Lipovŝek, et al., “Evolution of an Interloop Disulfide Bond in High-Affinity Antibody Mimics Based on Fibronectin Type III Domain and Selected by Yeast Surface Display: Molecular Convergence with Single-Domain Camelid a… [cited by applicant]
Luo et al., “N-terminal [beta]-strand swapping in a consensus-derived alternative scaffold driven by stabilizing hydrophobic interactions”, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, US, (Jul. 1, 2014), vol. 82,… [cited by applicant]
Meinke, et al., “Cellulose-Binding Polypeptides from Cellulomonas fimi: Endoglucanase D (CenD), a Family A β-1,4-Glucanase,” Journal of Bacteriology, 175(7): 1910-1918 (1993). [cited by applicant]
Odegrip et al., “CIS display: In vitro selection of peptides from libraries of protein-DNA complexes”, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, vol. 101, No. 9, pp. 2806-2810, Mar. 2004. [cited by applicant]
Olson et al., “Design, expression, and stability of a diverse protein library based on the human fibronectin type III domain”, Protein Science, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 476-484, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Parker, et al., “Antibody mimics based on human fibronectin type three domain engineered for thermostability and high-affinity binding to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor two,” Protein Engineering, Design & S… [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report for PCT/US 09/62367, dated Sep. 27, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Roberts et al., “RNA-peptide fusions for the in vitro selection of peptides and proteins”, Proc. Natl. Acad Sci, USA. vol. 94, pp. 12297-12302, Nov. 1997. [cited by applicant]
Skerra, et al., “Engineered protein scaffolds for molecular recognition,” Journal of Molecular Recognition, 13: 167-187 (2000). [cited by applicant]
Steiner, et al., “Efficient Selection of DARPins with Sub-nonomolar Affinities using SRP Phage Display,” Journal of Molecular Biology, 382: 1211-1227 (2008). [cited by applicant]
UniProt Accession No. P10039. (2013). [cited by applicant]
Watanabe, et al., “Gene Cloning of Chitinase A1 from Bacillus circulans WL-12 Revealed Its Evolutionary Relationship to Serratia Chitinase and to the Type III Homology United of Fibronectin,” The Journal of Biological C… [cited by applicant]
Xu, et al., “Directed Evolution of High-Affinity Antibody Mimics Using mRNA Display,” Chemistry & Biology, 9: 933-942 (2002). [cited by applicant]