IP Library Granted Patent US 12,524,695
Granted Patent B2
US 12,524,695 · App. 17/937,590 · Granted Jan 13, 2026

Quantum gate set including arbitrary angle gates and/or global gates

Inventors: Charles Baldwin (Broomfield, CO); Daniel Stack (Broomfield, CO); John Gaebler (Broomfield, CO); Michael Feig (Broomfield, CO); Karl Mayer (Broomfield, CO)
Assignee: Quantinuum LLC
G06N10/40G06F15/78
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,524,695
App. No.
17/937,590
Granted
Jan 13, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A controller of a QCCD-based quantum computer is configured to perform arbitrary angle two-qubit gates using global single-qubit gates and rotations of arbitrary angles and/or individual single-qubit gates that include two-qubit gate primitives, such as a phase-independent anti-symmetric two-qubit gate, and that are not individually addressed.

Claims (42)

1 . A method for performing a general two-qubit gate using a QCCD-based quantum processor, the method comprising:

providing a first atomic object and a second atomic object confined by an element of the QCCD-based quantum processor

causing, by a controller configured to control various operations of the QCCD-based quantum processor, performance of a first frame rotation of the first atomic object and performance of the first frame rotation of the second atomic object;

causing, by the controller, transportation of the first atomic object and the second atomic object such that the second atomic object is physically located proximate the first atomic object;

causing performance of a first phase-independent two-qubit gate corresponding to a rotation of a first arbitrary angle on the first atomic object and the second atomic object;

causing performance of a second frame rotation of the first atomic object and the second frame rotation of the second atomic object;

causing performance of a second arbitrary angle phase-independent two-qubit gate corresponding to a rotation of a second arbitrary angle to the first atomic object and the second atomic object;

causing performance of a third frame rotation of the first atomic object and the third frame rotation of the second atomic object; and

causing performance of a third phase-independent two-qubit gate corresponding to a third arbitrary angle to the first atomic object and the second atomic object.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the second frame rotation and the third frame rotation comprise a respective one or more global single-qubit gates, each global single qubit gate acts on the first atomic object and the second atomic object.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the second frame rotation and the third frame rotation are each performed by a respective pair of single-qubit gate manipulation signals being incident on both the first atomic object and the second atomic object.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the pair of single-qubit gate manipulation signals comprises a first manipulation signal and a second manipulation signal, the first manipulation signal and the second manipulation signal (a) co-propagate and (b) have a frequency difference corresponding to an energy difference between a first state of a qubit space and a second state of the qubit space.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first, second, and third phase-independent two-qubit gates are each performed by a respective pair of two-qubit gate manipulation signals being incident on both the first atomic object and the second atomic object.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the pair of two-qubit gate manipulation signals comprises a third manipulation signal and a fourth manipulation signal, the third manipulation signal and the fourth manipulation signal (a) propagate at a relative angle of 90 degrees, (b) are linearly polarized, and (c) are linearly polarized in perpendicular directions.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein at least one characteristic of at least one of the third manipulation signal or the fourth manipulation signal is controlled based on a functional representation of a manipulation signal characteristic as a function of an input signal to a modulator configured to condition a respective one of the third manipulation signal or the fourth manipulation signal, wherein the at least one characteristic is at least one of power level, frequency, or duration.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a phase of at least one of (a) the first atomic object or (b) the second atomic object is physically updated prior to performance of the first frame rotation or as part of the first frame rotation.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a cooling step is performed prior to performing the first phase-independent two-qubit gate.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein after performing the cooling step prior to performing the first phase-independent two-qubit gate, no further cooling is performed on the first atomic object and the second atomic object until after performance of the third phase-independent two-qubit gate.

11 . A quantum computer comprising:

an atomic object confinement apparatus configured to confine two or more atomic objects;

one or more manipulation sources; and

a controller configured to control the one or more manipulation sources and the atomic object confinement apparatus to cause the one or more manipulation sources to generate and provide two or more pairs of manipulation signals such that the two or more pairs of manipulation signals are each incident on the two or more atomic objects, wherein at least one of the two or more pairs of manipulation signals is configured to cause performance of an anti-symmetric two-qubit gate on the two or more atomic objects and wherein a combined effect of the two or more pairs of manipulation signals being incident on the two or more atomic objects is performance of an individual single-qubit gate.

12 . The quantum computer of claim 11 , wherein the two or more atomic objects comprise a first atomic object and a second atomic object and wherein the first atomic object and the second atomic object are separated by a separation distance corresponding to a selected phase difference of at least one of the two or more pairs of manipulation signals.

13 . The quantum computer of claim 11 , wherein the controller is further configured to track respective AC stark shifts imparted to each of the two or more atomic objects as a result of the two or more pairs of manipulation signals being incident on the two or more atomic objects.

14 . The quantum computer of claim 11 , wherein the single qubit gate is part of a controllable gate set that does not require single-qubit addressing.

15 . A quantum computer comprising:

an atomic object confinement apparatus configured to confine two or more atomic objects;

one or more manipulation sources; and

a controller configured to control the one or more manipulation sources and the atomic object confinement apparatus to cause:

a first atomic object to be confined by the atomic object confinement apparatus and a second atomic object to be confined by the atomic object confinement apparatus

cause a respective first frame rotation pair of manipulation signals to be incident on each of the first atomic object and the second atomic object to cause performance of a first frame rotation of the first atomic object and performance of the first frame rotation of the second atomic object;

cause transport of at least one of the first atomic object or the second atomic object such that the first atomic object is proximate the second atomic object;

cause a first two-qubit gate pair of manipulation signals to be incident on the first atomic object and the second atomic object to cause performance of a first phase-independent two-qubit gate corresponding to a rotation of a first arbitrary angle on the first atomic object and the second atomic object;

cause a second frame rotation pair of manipulation signals to be incident on the first atomic object and the second atomic object to cause performance of a second frame rotation of the first atomic object and the second frame rotation of the second atomic object;

cause a second two-qubit gate pair of manipulation signals to be incident on the first atomic object and the second atomic object to cause performance of a second phase-independent two-qubit gate corresponding to a rotation of a second arbitrary angle to the first atomic object and the second atomic object;

cause a third frame rotation pair of manipulation signals to be incident on the first atomic object and the second atomic object to cause performance of a third frame rotation of the first atomic object and the third frame rotation of the second atomic object; and

cause a third two-qubit gate pair of manipulation signals to be incident on the first atomic object and the second atomic object to cause performance of a third phase-independent two-qubit gate corresponding to a rotation of a third arbitrary angle to the first atomic object and the second atomic object.

16 . The quantum computer of claim 15 , wherein the first atomic object and the second atomic object are respective qubits of the quantum computer.

17 . The quantum computer of claim 15 , wherein the controller is further configured to determine a characteristic of at least one manipulation signal of at least one of a first multiple gate pair, second multiple gate pair, third multiple gate pair, or fourth multiple gate pair is determined based on a functional representation of a manipulation signal characteristic as a function of an input signal to a modulator configured to condition that the at least one manipulation signal, wherein the at least one characteristic is at least one of power level, frequency, or duration.

18 . The quantum computer of claim 15 , wherein the controller is further configured to control the atomic object confinement apparatus to maintain the first atomic object at a first location and maintain the second atomic object at a second location at least for a time period beginning when the first frame rotation pair of manipulation signals is incident on the first atomic object and the second atomic object and ending when the third two-qubit gate pair of manipulation signals is incident on the first atomic object and the second atomic object.

19 . The quantum computer of claim 15 , wherein the controller is further configured to cause performance of a cooling step prior to causing the first two-qubit gate pair of manipulation signals to be incident on the first atomic object and the second atomic object.

20 . The quantum computer of claim 19 , wherein after performing the cooling step prior to causing the first two-qubit gate pair of manipulation signals to be incident on the first atomic object and the second atomic object, no further cooling is performed on the first atomic object and the second atomic object until after performance of the third phase-independent two-qubit gate.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 16, 2022
From: BALDWIN, CHARLES; STACK, DANIEL; GAEBLER, JOHN; FEIG, MICHAEL; MAYER, KARL
To: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Reel/Frame 061789/0130 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 16, 2022
From: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
To: HONEYWELL HELIOS LLC
Reel/Frame 061789/0208 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 16, 2022
From: GAEBLER, JOHN; FEIG, MICHAEL; MAYER, KARL
To: QUANTINUUM LLC
Reel/Frame 061789/0366 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 16, 2022
From: HONEYWELL HELIOS LLC
To: QUANTINUUM LLC
Reel/Frame 061949/0819 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63270901 · Oct 22, 2021
Related Publication 20230125251A1 · Apr 27, 2023
References Cited (23)
US 11037776B1 · Makotyn et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20200116623A1 · Cooper-Roy · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210182096A1 · Walker et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210272005A1 · King · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210272006A1 · King · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210398009A1 · Vuletic · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220156626A1 · Gorshkov · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20240232673A1 · Gidney · 2024 [cited by applicant]
JP 2021505982A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021007560A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021025762A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2023010164A1 · 2023 [cited by examiner]
Baldwin, C. H., et al, “Subspace benchmarking high-fidelity entangling operations with trapped ions”, Physical Review Research, dated Mar. 19, 2020, retrieved from the Internet at https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.00085v3, 16 … [cited by applicant]
Lee, P. J., et al., “Phase control of trapped ion quantum gates”, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics, Sep. 21, 2005, pp. S371-S383, vol. 7, No. 10, Institute of Physics Publishing, Great Britain. [cited by applicant]
Outgoing—ISA/210—International Search Report Mailed on Feb. 9, 2023 for WO Application No. PCT/US22/047417, 2 page(s). [cited by applicant]
Outgoing Written Opinion of the ISA Mailed on Feb. 9, 2023 for WO Application No. PCT/US22/047417, 8 page(s). [cited by applicant]
Pino, J. M., et al., “Demonstration of the trapped-ion quantum CCD computer architecture”, Nature, dated Apr. 9, 2021, retrieved from the Internet at https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.01293.pdf, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sorensen, A., et al., “Entanglement and quantum computation with ions in thermal motion”; Physical Review A, Jul. 18, 2000, pp. 022311-1 thru 022311-11, vol. 62, The American Physical Society, USA. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Provisional Patent Application for “Apparatuses, Systems, and Methods for Elliptical Atomic Object Traps”, Unpublished (filing date Dec. 17, 2020), (David Hayes, Inventor), (Quantinuum LLC, Assignee), 63199279. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Provisional Patent Application for “Periodic Multi-Dimensional Atomic Object Confinement Apparatus Having Curved Legs”, Unpublished (filing date Aug. 19, 2021), (Christopher Langer, Inventor), (Quantinuum LLC, Assi… [cited by applicant]
English translation of JP Decision to Grant dated Feb. 12, 2025 for JP Application No. 2024523754, 2 page(s). [cited by applicant]
JP Decision to Grant Mailed on Feb. 12, 2025 for JP Application No. 2024523754, 3 page(s). [cited by applicant]
Lee, P. J., et al., “Phase Control of Trapped Ion Quantum Gates”, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics, submitted May 27, 2005 to the Cornell University Library Online Archive, available on the Internet… [cited by applicant]