IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,548,734
Granted Patent B2
US 12,548,734 · App. 18/087,648 · Granted Feb 10, 2026

In-line depth measurements by AFM

Inventor: Yehuda Zur (Tel-Aviv, IL)
Assignee: Applied Materials Israel Ltd.
H01J37/28H01J37/20H01J37/222H01J37/3056H01J2237/208H01J2237/2583H01J2237/31749
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,548,734
App. No.
18/087,648
Granted
Feb 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of evaluating a region of interest of a sample with a sample evaluation tool that includes a focused ion beam (FIB) column, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) column, and an atomic force microscope (AFM) instrument, the method comprising: transferring the sample into in a vacuum chamber of the sample evaluation tool; acquiring a plurality of two-dimensional images of the region of interest over a plurality of iterations of a delayering process by: (a) positioning the region of interest under a field of view of the FIB column; (b) milling a layer of material from the region of interest with the FIB column; (c) moving the region of interest under a field of view of the SEM column; (d) imaging the region of interest with the SEM column and measuring a depth of the milled layer in the region of interest with the AFM instrument; and repeating steps (a)-(d) a plurality of times without removing the sample from the vacuum chamber.

Claims (47)

1 . A method of evaluating a region of interest of a sample with a sample evaluation tool that includes a focused ion beam (FIB) column, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) column, and an atomic force microscope (AFM) instrument, the method comprising:

transferring the sample into in a vacuum chamber of the sample evaluation tool;

acquiring a plurality of two-dimensional images of the region of interest over a plurality of iterations of a delayering process by:

(a) positioning the region of interest under a field of view of the FIB column;

(b) milling a layer of material from the region of interest with the FIB column;

(c) moving the region of interest under a field of view of the SEM column;

(d) imaging the region of interest with the SEM column and measuring a depth of the milled layer in the region of interest with the AFM instrument; and

repeating steps (a)-(d) a plurality of times without removing the sample from the vacuum chamber.

2 . The method of evaluating a region of interest of a sample set forth in claim 1 further comprising generating a three-dimensional data cube representing the region of interest by stacking the plurality of two-dimensional images on top of each other in an order in which they were acquired.

3 . The method of evaluating a region of interest of a sample set forth in claim 2 wherein a height of each two-dimensional image that is part of the three-dimensional data cube is determined by AFM measurements.

4 . The method of evaluating a region of interest of a sample set forth in claim 1 wherein, during each iteration of the delayering process, milling a layer of material from the region of interest with the FIB column comprises scanning a focused ion beam generated by the FIB column across the region of interest a plurality of times prior to moving the region of interest under the field of view of the SEM column.

5 . The method of evaluating a region of interest of a sample set forth in claim 1 wherein during each iteration of the delayering process, an image of a milled layer is generated with the SEM column immediately prior to measuring a depth of the milled layer with the AFM instrument.

6 . The method of evaluating a region of interest of a sample set forth in claim 1 wherein during each iteration of the delayering process, a depth of the milled layer with the AFM instrument is measured immediately prior to generating an image of a milled layer with the SEM column.

7 . The method of evaluating a region of interest of a sample set forth in claim 2 wherein the step of acquiring a plurality of two-dimensional images of the region of interest further comprising aligning the plurality of two-dimensional images to each other prior to generating the three-dimensional data cube.

8 . The method of evaluating a region of interest of a sample set forth in claim 1 wherein the sample is a semiconductor wafer.

9 . A system for evaluating a region of a sample, the system comprising:

a vacuum chamber;

a focused ion beam (FIB) column configured to direct a charged particle beam into the vacuum chamber toward the sample;

a scanning electron microscope (SEM) column configured to direct a charged particle beam into the vacuum chamber toward the sample;

a sample support configured to hold a sample within the vacuum chamber during a sample evaluation process and move the sample between a field of view of the FIB column and the SEM column;

an atomic force microscope (AFM) instrument configured to measure a height of features on the sample while the sample is positioned on the sample support; and

a processor and a memory coupled to the processor, the memory including a plurality of computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the system to:

transfer the sample into in the vacuum chamber; and

acquire a plurality of two-dimensional images of a region of interest on the sample over a plurality of iterations of a delayering process by:

(a) positioning the region of interest under a field of view of the FIB column;

(b) milling a layer of material from the region of interest with the FIB column;

(c) moving the region of interest under a field of view of the SEM column;

(d) imaging the region of interest with the SEM column and measuring a depth of the milled layer in the region of interest with the AFM instrument; and

repeating steps (a)-(d) a plurality of times without removing the sample from the vacuum chamber.

10 . The system according to claim 9 wherein the computer-readable instructions further comprise instructions for generating a three-dimensional data cube representing the region of interest by stacking the plurality of two-dimensional images on top of each other in an order in which they were acquired.

11 . The system according to claim 10 a height of each two-dimensional image that is part of the three-dimensional data cube is determined by AFM measurements.

12 . The system according to claim 10 wherein acquiring a plurality of two-dimensional images of the region of interest further comprises aligning the plurality of two-dimensional images to each other prior to generating the three-dimensional data cube.

13 . The system according to claim 9 wherein, during each iteration of the delayering process, milling a layer of material from the region of interest with the FIB column comprises scanning a focused ion beam generated by the FIB column across the region of interest a plurality of times prior to moving the region of interest under the field of view of the SEM column.

14 . The system according to claim 9 wherein the sample is a semiconductor wafer.

15 . A non-transitory computer-readable memory that stores a plurality of computer-readable instructions for evaluating a region of interest on a sample by:

transferring the sample into in a vacuum chamber of the sample evaluation tool that includes a focused ion beam (FIB) column, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) column, and an atomic force microscope (AFM) instrument; and

acquiring a plurality of two-dimensional images of the region of interest over a plurality of iterations of a delayering process by:

(a) positioning the region of interest under a field of view of the FIB column;

(b) milling a layer of material from the region of interest with the FIB column;

(c) moving the region of interest under a field of view of the SEM column;

(d) imaging the region of interest with the SEM column and measuring a depth of the milled layer in the region of interest with the AFM instrument; and

repeating steps (a)-(d) a plurality of times without removing the sample from the vacuum chamber.

16 . The non-transitory computer-readable memory set forth in claim 15 wherein the computer-readable instructions for evaluating the region of interest on the sample further comprise instructions for generating a three-dimensional data cube representing the region of interest by stacking the plurality of two-dimensional images on top of each other in an order in which they were acquired.

17 . The non-transitory computer-readable memory set forth in claim 16 wherein a height of each two-dimensional image that is part of the three-dimensional data cube is determined by AFM measurements.

18 . The non-transitory computer-readable memory set forth in claim 15 wherein, during each iteration of the delayering process, milling a layer of material from the region of interest with the FIB column comprises scanning a focused ion beam generated by the FIB column across the region of interest a plurality of times prior to moving the region of interest under the field of view of the SEM column.

19 . The non-transitory computer-readable memory set forth in claim 15 wherein acquiring a plurality of two-dimensional images of the region of interest further comprises aligning the plurality of two-dimensional images to each other prior to generating the three-dimensional data cube.

20 . The non-transitory computer-readable memory set forth in claim 15 wherein the sample is a semiconductor wafer.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 22, 2022
From: ZUR, YEHUDA
To: APPLIED MATERIALS ISRAEL LTD.
Reel/Frame 062191/0488 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240212976A1 · Jun 27, 2024
References Cited (25)
US 5804460A · Bindell et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6670610B2 · Shemesh et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7312448B2 · Principe · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 8709269B2 · Shemesh · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10879035B2 · Mizuno · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20070158562A1 · Nasser-Ghodsi · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20130094716A1 · Carpio · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130174301A1 · Robinson · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140226003A1 · Phaneuf · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160307729A1 · Lazic · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180218878A1 · Xu · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200152420A1 · Williamson · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200384592A1 · Zur · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210073992A1 · Konishi · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210082664A1 · Zur · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210374927A1 · Liu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220107332A1 · Liu et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220415610A1 · Blayvas · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230019567A1 · Mairov · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230245933A1 · Jiang · 2023 [cited by examiner]
JP 6374035B2 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
KR 20110021822A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018140903A2 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
PCT/US2023/085239, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Apr. 30, 2024, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT/US2023/085239, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, Jul. 3, 2025, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]