IP Library Granted Patent US 12,188,813
Granted Patent B2
US 12,188,813 · App. 18/204,592 · Granted Jan 7, 2025

System and method for evaluating the efficiency of circadian-effective luminaires

Inventors: Mark S. Rea (New York, NY); Mariana Figueiro (New York, NY); Allison Lyn Thayer (New York, NY); Charles Jarboe (New York, NY); Andrew Bierman (New York, NY)
Assignee: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
G01J1/42G01J2001/4242
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,188,813
App. No.
18/204,592
Granted
Jan 7, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method evaluate the efficiency of circadian-effective luminaires. Such circadian-effective luminaires affect the master biological clock in the brain, which regulates the daily timings of behavioral activities and physiological functions. Disruption of circadian rhythms can lead to poor performance and poor health, while consistent exposure to bright days and dim nights is necessary for circadian entrainment, and thus for good sleep and good health. The system and method provide a standard test for assessing the efficiency of luminaires for providing circadian-effective light to building occupants. The system and method measure and quantify luminaire efficiency based on the electrical watts needed, termed SOWatt, to reach a circadian stimulus (CS) criterion of 0.3 at the eyes of a standard observer (SO). The system and method can be applied to ceiling mounted, accent, and table-top luminaires.

Claims (29)

1. A method, comprising:

receiving configuration data for a luminaire;

applying a predetermined rule to the configuration data by a computer-based processor;

determining an effective lighting value of the luminaire using the computer-based processor, wherein the effective lighting value is a circadian-effective lighting wattage of the luminaire that provides a criterion level of circadian-effective lighting that is determined by a test procedure; and

outputting the effective lighting value.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the circadian-effective lighting wattage (SOWatt) induces a circadian stimulus (CS) at the eyes of a standard observer (SO) relative to the luminaire.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the CS equals 0.3.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein outputting the effective lighting value includes displaying the effective lighting value on a display device.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the displaying of the effective lighting value includes displaying a graphic listing the effective lighting value.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein outputting the effective lighting value includes printing a graphic label listing the effective lighting value.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the luminaire is selected from the group consisting of: a ceiling mounted luminaire, an accent luminaire, and a table-top luminaire.

8. A method, comprising:

receiving configuration data for a luminaire;

applying a predetermined rule to the configuration data by a computer-based processor;

determining a circadian-effective lighting wattage (SOWatt) of the luminaire using the computer-based processor, wherein the circadian-effective lighting wattage induces a circadian stimulus (CS) during daytime at the eyes of a standard observer (SO) relative to the luminaire, wherein the circadian-effective lighting wattage provides a criterion level of circadian-effective lighting that is determined by a test procedure; and

displaying the circadian-effective lighting wattage.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the CS equals 0.3.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein displaying the circadian-effective lighting wattage includes displaying a graphic on a display device, wherein the graphic lists the circadian-effective lighting wattage.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein displaying the circadian-effective lighting wattage includes printing a graphic label listing the circadian-effective lighting wattage.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein the luminaire is selected from the group consisting of: a ceiling mounted luminaire, an accent luminaire, and a table-top luminaire.

13. A system, comprising:

an interface configured to receive configuration data for a luminaire; and

a computer-based processor having code therein configured to apply a predetermined rule to the configuration data and to determine an effective lighting value of the luminaire, wherein the effective lighting value is a circadian-effective lighting wattage of the luminaire that provides a criterion level of circadian-effective lighting that is determined by a test procedure,

wherein the interface is configured to output the effective lighting value.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the circadian-effective lighting wattage (SOWatt) induces a circadian stimulus (CS) at the eyes of a standard observer (SO) relative to the luminaire.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the CS equals 0.3.

16. The system of claim 13 , wherein the interface includes a display device configured to display the effective lighting value.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the interface displays a graphic listing the effective lighting value.

18. The system of claim 13 , wherein the interface includes a printer configured to print a graphic label listing the effective lighting value.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 15, 2024
From: REA, MARK S.; FIGUEIRO, MARIANA; THAYER, ALLISON LYN; JARBOE, CHARLES
To: ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
Reel/Frame 066789/0953 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63347812 · Jun 1, 2022
Related Publication 20230392979A1 · Dec 7, 2023
References Cited (3)
US 10299355B2 · Rajagopalan · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10609798B1 · Maa · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20180110105A1 · Guzik · 2018 [cited by examiner]