IP Library Granted Patent US 12,661,069
Granted Patent B2
US 12,661,069 · App. 18/224,174 · Granted Jun 23, 2026

System and method for validating cardiovascular parameter monitors

Inventor: Tuhin Sinha (Burlingame, CA)
Assignee: Midmark Corporation
A61B5/7221A61B5/02208A61B5/02233A61B5/0295
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,661,069
App. No.
18/224,174
Filed
Jul 20, 2023
Granted
Jun 23, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3791
USPC
600/481
Abstract

A system or method for validating an unvalidated cardiovascular parameter monitor can include receiving a plurality of reference cardiovascular parameter datasets, each reference cardiovascular parameter dataset associated with a patient of a plurality of patients; receiving a plurality of test cardiovascular parameter measurements, each test cardiovascular parameter measurement includes a cardiovascular parameter measured for a patient of the plurality of patients; and validating the cardiovascular parameter monitor based on an analysis of the plurality of reference cardiovascular measurements and the plurality of test cardiovascular parameter measurement.

Claims (45)

1 . A method for determining a validation status for a blood pressure monitor comprising:

for a plurality of patients:

(a) at a first time, measuring a validated blood pressure for each patient of the plurality by:

(i) inflating and deflating a blood pressure cuff disposed on a first arm of the patient;

(ii) contemporaneously with inflating and deflating the blood pressure cuff, measuring an audio signal at a frequency of at least 10 kHz using a digital stethoscope; and

(iii) contemporaneously with inflating and deflating the blood pressure cuff, measuring a pressure dataset using a digital pressure gauge, wherein the pressure dataset comprises an instantaneous pressure of the blood pressure cuff measured at a frequency of at least 10 Hz;

(b) contemporaneously with measuring the validated blood pressure, (b) measuring an unvalidated blood pressure using the blood pressure monitor for each patient comprising:

(i) recording a time series of images of a finger region of the respective patient on a second arm of the respective patient;

(ii) determining a pulse waveform from the time series of images; and

(iii) extracting a set of fiducials from the pulse waveform, wherein the set of fiducials comprise fit parameters associated with a set of fitting functions used to fit the pulse waveform; and

(iv) transforming the set of fiducials into the unvalidated blood pressure;

(c) at a second time, comparing the validated blood pressure to the unvalidated blood pressure; and

(d) determining the validation status of the blood pressure monitor based on the comparison;

wherein the validated blood pressure comprises a systolic blood pressure approximately equal to a pressure of the pressure dataset measured when a first Korotkoff sound is detected in the audio signal and a diastolic blood pressure approximately equal to a pressure of the pressure dataset measured when a fourth or fifth Korotkoff sound is detected in the audio signal.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first time and the second time differ by at least one hour.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the systolic blood pressure and the diastolic blood pressure are determined in a post-hoc analysis of the audio signal and the pressure dataset, via a computing system.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein comparing the validated blood pressure to the unvalidated blood pressure comprises performing a mixed model repeated analysis, via computing system, wherein the validation status is positive when a mean error of the unvalidated blood pressure is about ±5 mmHg or a standard deviation of at most about 8 mmHg.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising, for each patient of the plurality of patients, contemporaneously with inflating and deflating the blood pressure cuff, measuring an ECG dataset.

6 . A method for determining a validation status for a photoplethysmography-based blood pressure monitor comprising:

(a) at a first time, measuring a validated blood pressure for a patient by:

(i) inflating and deflating a blood pressure cuff disposed on a first arm of the patient,

(ii) contemporaneously with inflating and deflating the blood pressure cuff, measuring an audio signal at a frequency of at least 10 kHz using a digital stethoscope, and

(iii) contemporaneously with inflating and deflating the blood pressure cuff, measuring a pressure dataset using a digital pressure gauge, wherein the pressure dataset comprises an instantaneous pressure of the blood pressure cuff measured at a frequency of at least 10 Hz;

(b) contemporaneously with measuring the validated blood pressure, measuring an unvalidated blood pressure using a photoplethysmography-based blood pressure monitor for the patient comprising:

(i) recording a time series of images of a finger region of a second arm of the patient,

(ii) determining a pulse waveform from the time series of images,

(iii) extracting a set of fiducials from the pulse waveform, wherein the set of fiducials comprise fit parameters associated with a set of fitting functions used to fit the pulse waveform, and

(iv) transforming the set of fiducials into the unvalidated blood pressure;

(c) at a second time, comparing the validated blood pressure to the unvalidated blood pressure;

(d) determining the validation status of the photoplethysmography-based blood pressure monitor based on the comparison; and

(e) outputting the validation status, wherein the validation status enables or disables the photoplethysmography-based blood pressure monitor for clinical use,

wherein the validated blood pressure comprises a systolic blood pressure approximately equal to a pressure of the pressure dataset measured when a first Korotkoff sound is detected in the audio signal and a diastolic blood pressure approximately equal to a pressure of the pressure dataset measured when a fourth or fifth Korotkoff sound is detected in the audio signal.

7 . A method for determining a validation status for a blood pressure monitor comprising:

(a) at a first time, measuring a validated blood pressure for a patient by:

(i) inflating and deflating a blood pressure cuff disposed on a first arm of the patient,

(ii) contemporaneously with inflating and deflating the blood pressure cuff, measuring an audio signal at a frequency of at least 10 kHz using a digital stethoscope, and

(iii) contemporaneously with inflating and deflating the blood pressure cuff, measuring a pressure dataset using a digital pressure gauge, wherein the pressure dataset comprises an instantaneous pressure of the blood pressure cuff measured at a frequency of at least 10 Hz;

(b) contemporaneously with measuring the validated blood pressure, measuring an unvalidated blood pressure using the blood pressure monitor for the patient comprising:

(i) recording a time series of images of a finger region of a second arm of the patient,

(ii) determining a pulse waveform from the time series of images,

(iii) extracting a set of fiducials from the pulse waveform, wherein the set of fiducials comprise fit parameters associated with a set of fitting functions used to fit the pulse waveform, and

(iv) transforming the set of fiducials into the unvalidated blood pressure;

(c) using a computing system, automatically processing the validated blood pressure and the unvalidated blood pressure by comparing the validated blood pressure to the unvalidated blood pressure; and

(d) using the computing system, automatically determining the validation status of the blood pressure monitor based on the comparison,

wherein the validated blood pressure comprises a systolic blood pressure approximately equal to a pressure of the pressure dataset measured when a first Korotkoff sound is detected in the audio signal and a diastolic blood pressure approximately equal to a pressure of the pressure dataset measured when a fourth or fifth Korotkoff sound is detected in the audio signal.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 7, 2026
From: RIVA HEALTH, INC.
To: MIDMARK CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 073394/0621 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 20, 2023
From: SINHA, TUHIN
To: RIVA HEALTH, INC.
Reel/Frame 064323/0937 →
Continuity (3)
Division 17688514 · Mar 7, 2022
Provisional Application 63157364 · Mar 5, 2021
Related Publication 20230355182A1 · Nov 9, 2023
References Cited (132)
US 5649543A · Hosaka et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6337629B1 · Bader · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6475153B1 · Khair et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6993377B2 · Flick et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7286875B1 · Park et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7544168B2 · Nitzan · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7787946B2 · Stahmann et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8239010B2 · Banet et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8308649B2 · Holmstrom et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8761853B2 · Thaveeprungsriporn et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10229754B2 · Cronin et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10349893B2 · Lee et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10413197B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10420515B2 · Sinha et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10716481B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10729338B2 · Wang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10820857B2 · Nasry · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11154208B2 · Nitzan · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11324411B2 · Sinha et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11445982B2 · Lyman et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11534070B2 · Tsutsumi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11717253B2 · Jones · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11744523B2 · Sinha · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11881319B2 · Junnarkar · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20030163057A1 · Flick et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20070066910A1 · Inukai et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080045818A1 · Wood et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080077025A1 · Delgado-Herrera et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090326386A1 · Sethi et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100168589A1 · Banet et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110066051A1 · Moon et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110077531A1 · Addison et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110224564A1 · Moon et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110245628A1 · Baker et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120029320A1 · Watson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120179011A1 · Moon et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120190947A1 · Chon et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130171599A1 · Bleich et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130276785A1 · Melker et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130310656A1 · Lim et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130324859A1 · Park et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130345568A1 · Mestha et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140003454A1 · Kaemmerer et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140100485A1 · Linguraru et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140275854A1 · Venkatraman et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140278220A1 · Yuen · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140303454A1 · Clifton et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150037937A1 · Park et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150080746A1 · Bleich et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150182132A1 · Harris et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150324977A1 · Magrath et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150379370A1 · Clifton et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160058375A1 · Rothkopf · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160256117A1 · Baik et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160302674A1 · Moyer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160360980A1 · Sinha et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170007137A1 · Hong et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170071516A1 · Bhagat et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170079533A1 · Robinson et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170238878A1 · Lading et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180110470A1 · Lee et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180146865A1 · Ortlepp · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180177414A1 · Tokko et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180184983A1 · Petersen et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180263513A1 · Qasem · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180310891A1 · Fine et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190059753A1 · Chen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190059825A1 · Baruch · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190104953A1 · Narasimhan · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190138846A1 · Durrleman et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190175120A1 · Huang · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190357781A1 · Sinha et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200037956A1 · Kang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200107763A1 · Antunes et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200196878A1 · Bentzion · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200297220A1 · Lu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210345939A1 · Jumbe et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220280118A1 · Sinha · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230082362A1 · Varadan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230125180A1 · Singh et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230148880A1 · Sinha · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230165456A1 · Wada et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230200664A1 · Peters · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230210386A1 · Naito et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230277130A1 · Khaleghimeybodi et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230293103A1 · Higuchi et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240041402A1 · Stevenson · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240096507A1 · Junnarkar · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240108303A1 · Tamborini et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240122491A1 · Lee et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240138687A1 · Balashov et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240188839A1 · Ito et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240298902A1 · John Archibald · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240358326A1 · Dwarika et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240374219A1 · Mohammadi et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
CN 103826532A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104337509A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 106236049A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 2992820A2 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016528981A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
KR 20160028093A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014022906A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015193551A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2024081244A1 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
WO 2024092014A1 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/US20/053785 dated Jan. 21, 2021. [cited by applicant]
“Clinical Validation of Tele-stethoscope System Digital”, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT03596541, first posted Jul. 24, 2018. [cited by applicant]
“National Institute of Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)”, Health Tech/Blood Pressure Procedures Manual, May 2009. [cited by applicant]
“Non-invasive sphygmomanometers—Part 2: Clinical investigation of intermittent automated measurement type”, International Standard, ISO 81060-2, Third edition Nov. 2018. [cited by applicant]
Alpert, Bruce , “The Accutension Stetho, an automated auscultatory device to validate automated sphygmomanometer readings in individual patients”, Journal of Human Hypertension (2018) 32:455-459, Apr. 6, 2018, https://d… [cited by applicant]
Elgendi, Mohamed , “Merging digital medicine and economics: Two moving averages unlock biosignals for better health”, Diseases 6.1 (2018): 6. (Year: 2018). [cited by applicant]
Lai, Lillian S.W., et al., “Computerized Automatic Diagnosis of Innocent and Pathologic Murmurs in Pediatrics: A Pilot Study”, Congenital Heart Dis. 2016;11:386-395. [cited by applicant]
Lee, Han-Wook , et al., “he periodic moving average filter for removing motion artifacts from PPG signals”, International Journal ofControl, Automation, and Systems 5.6 (2007): 701-706. (Year: 2007). [cited by applicant]
Perpetuini, David , et al., “Multi-site photoplethysmographic and electrocardiogram for arterial stiffness and cardiovascular status assessment”, Sensors 19.24 (2019): 5570. (Year: 2019). [cited by applicant]
Rojano, Juan F., “Singular value decomposition of the time-frequency distribution of PPG signals for motion artifact reduction”, Int. J. Signal Process. Syst 4.6 (2016): 475-482. (Year: 2016). [cited by applicant]
Scholze, A. , et al., “Increased arterial vascular tone during the night in patients with essential hypertension”, Journal of Human Hypertension (2007) 21, 60-67. published online Oct. 5. [retrieved on Aug. 22, 2016] re… [cited by applicant]
Stergiou, George S., et al., “A Universal Standard for the Validation of Blood Pressure Measuring Devices”, Hypertension, Mar. 2018;71(3):368-374, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10237. Epub Jan. 31, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Stergiou, George S., et al., “Validation protocols for blood pressure measuring devices in the 21st century”, J Clin Hypertens. 2018;20:1096-1099. [cited by applicant]
Sugita, Norihiro , et al., “Techniques for estimating blood pressure variation using video images”, 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) Aug. 29, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Trafton, Anne , “In the blink of an eye, MIT neuroscientists find the brain can identify images seen for an as little as 13 milliseconds”, MIT News, Jan. 16, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Vadrevu, Simhadri , et al., “A robust pulse onset and peak detection method for automated PPG signal analysis system”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 68.3 (2018): 807-817. (Year: 2018). [cited by applicant]
Wang, Lu , et al., “Multi-Gaussian fitting for pulse waveform using weighted least squares and multi-criteria decision making method”, Computers in biology and medicine 43.11 (2013): 1661-1672. (Year: 2013). [cited by applicant]
Wu, Hongiun , et al., “A New Automatic blood pressure kit auscultates for accurate reading with a smartphone”, Medicine (2016) 95:32. [cited by applicant]
Dey, Jishnu , et al., “InstaBP: cuff-less blood pressure monitoring on smartphone using single PPG sensor”, 2018 4th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC). IEEE, … [cited by applicant]
Chan, et al., “Diagnostic performance of a smartphoneabased photoplethysmographic application for atrial fibrillation screening in a primary care setting”, Journal of the American Heart Association 5.7 (2016): e003428. … [cited by applicant]
Couceiro, et al., “Assessment of cardiovascular function from multi-Gaussian fitting of a finger photoplethysmogram.”, Physiological measurement 36.9 (2015): 1801. (Year: 2015). [cited by applicant]
Couceiro, et al., “Characterization of surrogate parameters for blood pressure regulation in neurally-mediated syncope”, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society … [cited by applicant]
Fedor, “Predicting health-related quality of life in early adulthood from individual differences in adolescent neurocognitive development”, Diss. University of Pittsburgh, 2020. (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
Hamid, et al., “Methods of Extracting Feature from Photoplethysmogram Waveform for Non-Invasive Diagnostic Applications”, International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering 16.9 (2020). (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
Reddy, et al., “Evaluation of objective distortion measures for automatic quality assessment of processed PPG signals for real-time health monitoring devices”, Ieee Access 10 ( 2022): 15707-15745. (Year: 2022). [cited by applicant]
Rezaeisharif, “A Decision Support Model for the Necessity of Cardio-Angiography, A Result of Generalized Additive and logistic Regression Model”, Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (2021). (Year: 2021). [cited by applicant]
Tang, et al., “Synthetic photoplethysmogram generation using two Gaussian functions”, Scientific Reports 10.1 (2020): 13883. (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]