IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,905,382
Granted Patent B2
US 10,905,382 · App. 15/459,128 · Granted Feb 2, 2021

Bio-signal quality assessment apparatus and method and bio-signal measurement parameter optimization apparatus and method

Inventors: Jong Wook Lee (Suwon-si, KR); Byung Hoon Ko (Hwaseong-si, KR); Jin Hyun Yun (Seoul, KR)
Assignee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
A61B5/7221A61B5/0015A61B5/02416A61B5/7235A61B5/742
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,905,382
App. No.
15/459,128
Granted
Feb 2, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

A bio-signal quality assessment apparatus, a bio-signal quality assessment method, a bio-signal measurement parameter optimization apparatus, and bio-signal measurement parameter optimization apparatus method are provided. The bio-signal quality assessment apparatus includes a processor configured to determine a moving average of a bio-signal, and assess a quality of the bio-signal, based on a comparison between the determined moving average and the bio-signal.

Claims (69)

1. A bio-signal quality assessment apparatus comprising: a processor configured to:

determine a moving average of a measured bio-signal;

divide the measured bio-signal into sections;

compare each of a plurality of values of a plurality of bio-signal samples of the measured bio-signal with the determined moving average;

determine a number of bio-signal samples having a value greater than the determined moving average in each of the sections as a result of the comparison;

determine a variance or a standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples in each of the sections;

determine a quality of the measured bio-signal as being a first quality when the variance or the standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples is greater than or equal to a threshold value;

determine the quality of the measured bio-signal as being a second quality when the variance or the standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples is less than the threshold value; and

adjust, based on the quality of the determined bio-signal, any one or any combination of an amount of an emitted light, an amplification gain of a measuring of the bio-signal, and a cancellation current of a measuring of the bio-signal;

wherein a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the measured bio-signal is positively correlated with the variance or the standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples.

2. The bio-signal quality assessment apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the bio-signal is a photoplethysmography signal.

3. The bio-signal quality assessment apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the moving average is an exponentially weighted moving average.

4. The bio-signal quality assessment apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to assess that the quality of the measured bio-signal is better as the determined variance or the determined standard deviation is larger than the threshold value.

5. The bio-signal quality assessment apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising a bio-signal measurer configured to measure the bio-signal.

6. The bio-signal quality assessment apparatus of claim 5 , wherein the bio-signal measurer comprises:

a light source configured to emit the light onto a subject; and

a photodetector configured to measure the bio-signal by detecting light that is reflected or scattered from the subject.

7. The bio-signal quality assessment apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising a data receiver configured to receive data of the bio-signal from an external device.

8. A bio-signal quality assessment method comprising:

determining a moving average of a measured bio-signal;

dividing the measured bio-signal into sections;

comparing each of a plurality of values of a plurality of bio-signal samples of the measured bio-signal with the determined moving average;

determining a number of bio-signal samples having a value greater than the determined moving average in each of the sections as a result of the comparison;

determining a variance or a standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples in each of the sections;

determining a quality of the measured bio-signal as being a first quality when the variance or the standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples is greater than or equal to a threshold value;

determining the quality of the measured bio-signal as being a second quality when the variance or the standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples is less than a threshold value; and

adjusting, based on the quality of the determined bio-signal, any one or any combination of an amount of an emitted light, an amplification gain of a measuring of the bio-signal, and a cancellation current of a measuring of the bio-signal,

wherein a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the measured bio-signal is positively correlated with the variance or the standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples.

9. The bio-signal quality assessment method of claim 8 , wherein the assessing of the quality of measured the bio-signal further comprises assessing that the quality of the measured bio-signal is better as the determined variance or the determined standard deviation is larger than the threshold value.

10. The bio-signal quality assessment method of claim 8 , wherein the bio-signal is a photoplethysmography signal.

11. The bio-signal quality assessment method of claim 8 , wherein the moving average is an exponentially weighted moving average.

12. The bio-signal quality assessment method of claim 8 , further comprising measuring the bio-signal.

13. The bio-signal quality assessment method of claim 12 , further comprising emitting the light onto a subject,

wherein the measuring of the bio-signal comprises measuring the bio-signal by detecting light that is reflected or scattered from the subject.

14. The bio-signal quality assessment method of claim 8 , further comprising receiving data of the bio-signal from an external device.

15. A bio-signal measurement parameter optimization apparatus comprising:

a bio-signal measurer configured to:

emit light onto a subject; and

measure a bio-signal by detecting light that is reflected or scattered from the subject; and

a processor configured to:

determine a moving average of the measured bio-signal;

divide the measured bio-signal into sections;

compare each of a plurality of values of a plurality of bio-signal samples of the measured bio-signal with the determined moving average;

determine a number of bio-signal samples having a value greater than the determined moving average in each of the sections as a result of the comparison;

determine a variance or a standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples in each of the sections;

determine a quality of the measured bio-signal as being a first quality when the variance or the standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples is greater than or equal to a threshold value; and

determine the quality of the measured bio-signal as being a second quality when the variance or the standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples is less than the threshold value, wherein a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the measured bio-signal is positively correlated with the variance or the standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples, and

adjust, based on the determined quality of the measured bio-signal, any one or any combination of an amount of the emitted light, an amplification gain of the bio-signal measurer, and a cancellation current of the bio-signal measurer.

16. The bio-signal measurement parameter optimization apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the bio-signal is a photoplethysmography signal.

17. The bio-signal measurement parameter optimization apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the moving average is an exponentially weighted moving average.

18. The bio-signal measurement parameter optimization apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the processor is further configured to, in response to the determined quality of the measured bio-signal being the second quality, adjust any one or any combination of the amount of the emitted light, the amplification gain, and the cancellation current.

19. The bio-signal measurement parameter optimization apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

in response to the determined quality of the measured bio-signal being greater than the threshold value, determine whether a number of times of measuring the bio-signal corresponds to a predetermined value;

in response to the number of times of measuring the bio-signal being determined to not correspond to the predetermined value, measure another bio-signal;

in response to the number of times of measuring the bio-signal being determined to correspond to the predetermined value, determine bio-signal quality indices of a plurality of bio-signals that are measured, and determine an average of the determined bio-quality indices; and

in response to the determined average of the bio-signal quality indices being less than or equal to a threshold value, adjust any one or any combination of the amount of the emitted light, the amplification gain, and the cancellation current.

20. A bio-signal measurement parameter optimization method comprising:

emitting light onto a subject;

measuring a bio-signal by detecting light that is reflected or scattered from the subject;

determining a moving average of the measured bio-signal;

dividing the measured bio-signal into sections;

comparing each of a plurality of values of a plurality of bio-signal samples of the measured bio-signal with the determined moving average;

determining a number of bio-signal samples having a value greater than the determined moving average in each of the sections as a result of the comparison;

determining a variance or a standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples in each of the sections;

determining a quality of the measured bio-signal as being a first

quality when the variance or the standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples is greater than or equal to a threshold value;

determining the quality of the measured bio-signal as being a second quality when the variance or the standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples is less than the threshold value, wherein a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the measured bio-signal is positively correlated with the variance or the standard deviation of the determined number of bio-signal samples; and

adjusting, based on the quality of the determined bio-signal, any one or any combination of an amount of the emitted light, an amplification gain of the measuring of the bio-signal, and a cancellation current of the measuring of the bio-signal.

21. The bio-signal measurement parameter optimization method of claim 20 , wherein the adjusting comprises, in response to the determined quality of the measured bio-signal being the second quality, adjust any one or any combination of the amount of the emitted light, the amplification gain, and the cancellation current.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 15, 2017
From: LEE, JONG WOOK; KO, BYUNG HOON; YUN, JIN HYUN
To: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 041579/0441 →
Priority Claims (1)
KR 10-2016-0139407 · Oct 25, 2016 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20180110470A1 · Apr 26, 2018
Cited By (1)
US 12,336,797