IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,329,049
Granted Patent B2
US 12,329,049 · App. 18/338,809 · Granted Jun 17, 2025

Predictive map generation and control system

Inventors: Nathan R. Vandike (Geneseo, IL); Bhanu Kiran Reddy Palla (Bettendorf, IA); Noel W. Anderson (Fargo, ND); Stephen R. Corban (Geneseo, IL)
Assignee: Deere & Company
A01B69/004G05D1/0044G05D1/0274G05D1/0278G05D1/222G05D1/229G05D1/248H05K7/20918
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,329,049
App. No.
18/338,809
Granted
Jun 17, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

One or more information maps are obtained by an agricultural work machine. The one or more information maps map one or more agricultural characteristic values at different geographic locations of a field. An in-situ sensor on the agricultural work machine senses an agricultural characteristic as the agricultural work machine moves through the field. A predictive map generator generates a predictive map that predicts a predictive agricultural characteristic at different locations in the field based on a relationship between the values in the one or more information maps and the agricultural characteristic sensed by the in-situ sensor. The predictive map can be output and used in automated machine control.

Claims (37)

1. An agricultural system comprising:

an in-situ sensor that detects a value of fuel consumption corresponding to a first geographic location in a field;

one or more processors; and

memory storing computer executable instructions, executable by the one or more processors, the computer executable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, configure the one or more processors to:

obtain an information map that includes values of an agricultural characteristic corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field;

identify a predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to a second geographic location in the field based on a value of the agricultural characteristic in the information map at the first geographic location and the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location; and

generate a control signal to control a controllable subsystem of an agricultural work machine based on the predictive value of fuel consumption.

2. The agricultural system of claim 1 , wherein the information map includes, as the values of the agricultural characteristic, values of yield corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field and wherein the predictive value of fuel consumption is a predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic location based on a value of yield in the information map at the first geographic location and the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location.

3. The agricultural system of claim 1 , wherein the information map includes, as the values of the agricultural characteristic, values of vegetative index corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field and wherein the predictive value of fuel consumption is a predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic location based on a value of vegetative index in the information map at the first geographic location and the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location.

4. The agricultural system of claim 1 , wherein the information map includes, as the values of the agricultural characteristic, values of crop moisture corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field and wherein the predictive value of fuel consumption is a predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic location based on a value of crop moisture in the information map at the first geographic location and the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location.

5. The agricultural system of claim 1 , wherein the information map includes, as the values of the agricultural characteristic, values of a topographic characteristic corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field and wherein the predictive value of fuel consumption is a predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic location based on a value of the topographic characteristic in the information map at the first geographic location and the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location.

6. The agricultural system of claim 1 , wherein the information map includes, as the values of the agricultural characteristic, values of a soil property corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field and wherein the predictive value of fuel consumption is a predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic location based on a value of the soil property in the information map at the first geographic location and the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location.

7. The agricultural system of claim 1 , wherein the information map includes, as the values of the agricultural characteristic, values of biomass corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field and wherein the predictive value of fuel consumption is a predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic location based on a value of biomass in the information map at the first geographic location and the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location.

8. The agricultural system of claim 1 , wherein the information map includes, as the values of the agricultural characteristic, values of a power characteristic corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field and wherein the predictive value of fuel consumption is a predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic location based on a value of the power characteristic in the information map at the first geographic location and the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location.

9. The agricultural system of claim 1 , wherein the computer executable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further configure the one or more processors to identify a relationship between fuel consumption and the agricultural characteristic based on a value of the agricultural characteristic in the information map at the first geographic location and the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location and to identify the predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic locations based on the relationship between fuel consumption and the agricultural characteristic and a value of the agricultural characteristic, in the information map, corresponding to the second geographic location.

10. The agricultural system of claim 1 , wherein the computer executable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further configure the one or more processors to generate a user interface representation of the field with a marker indicating the predictive value of fuel consumption at the second geographic location.

11. A computer implemented method comprising:

obtaining an information map that includes values of an agricultural characteristic corresponding to different geographic locations in a field;

detecting, with an in-situ sensor, a value of fuel consumption corresponding to a first geographic location in the field;

identifying a predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to a second geographic location, based on a value of the agricultural characteristic in the information map corresponding to the first geographic location and the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location; and

controlling a controllable subsystem of an agricultural work machine based on the predictive value of fuel consumption.

12. The computer implemented method of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the information map comprises obtaining an information map that includes, as values of the agricultural characteristic, values of yield corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field and wherein identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption comprises identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic location based on a value of yield in the information map corresponding to the first geographic location and based on the value fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location.

13. The computer implemented method of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the information map comprises obtaining an information map that includes, as values of the agricultural characteristic, values of vegetative index corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field and wherein identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption comprises identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic location based on a value of vegetative index in the information map corresponding to the first geographic location and based on the value fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location.

14. The computer implemented method of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the information map comprises obtaining an information map that includes, as values of the agricultural characteristic, values of crop moisture corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field and wherein identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption comprises identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic location based on a value of crop moisture in the information map corresponding to the first geographic location and based on the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location.

15. The computer implemented method of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the information map comprises obtaining an information map that includes, as values of the agricultural characteristic, values of a topographic characteristic corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field and wherein identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption comprises identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic location based on a value of the topographic characteristic in the information map corresponding to the first geographic location and based on the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location.

16. The computer implemented method of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the information map comprises obtaining an information map that includes, as values of the agricultural characteristic, values of a soil property corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field and wherein identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption comprises identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic location based on a value of the soil property in the information map corresponding to the first geographic location and based on the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location.

17. The computer implemented method of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the information map comprises obtaining an information map that includes, as values of the agricultural characteristic, values of biomass corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field and wherein identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption comprises identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic location based on a value of biomass in the information map corresponding to the first geographic location and based on the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location.

18. The computer implemented method of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the information map comprises obtaining an information map that includes, as values of the agricultural characteristic, values of a power characteristic corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field and wherein identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption comprises identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic location based on a value of the power characteristic in the information map corresponding to the first geographic location and based on the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location.

19. The computer implemented method of claim 11 and further comprising identifying a relationship between fuel consumption and the agricultural characteristic based on the value of the agricultural characteristic in the information map corresponding to the first geographic location and based on the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location and wherein identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption comprises identifying the predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to the second geographic location based on a value of the agricultural characteristic in the information map corresponding to the second geographic location and based on the relationship between fuel consumption and the agricultural characteristic.

20. An agricultural work machine comprising:

a controllable subsystem;

an in-situ sensor that detects a value of fuel consumption corresponding to a first geographic location in a field;

one or more processors; and

memory storing computer executable instructions, executable by the one or more processors, the computer executable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, configure the one or more processors to:

obtain an information map that includes values of an agricultural characteristic corresponding to the different geographic locations in the field;

identify a predictive value of fuel consumption corresponding to a second geographic location in the field based on a value of the agricultural characteristic in the information map at the first geographic location and the value of fuel consumption, detected by the in-situ sensor, corresponding to the first geographic location; and

generate a control signal to control the controllable subsystem of the agricultural work machine based on the predictive value of fuel consumption.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2023
From: VANDIKE, NATHAN R.; REDDY PALLA, BHANU KIRAN; ANDERSON, NOEL W.; CORBAN, STEPHEN R.
To: DEERE & COMPANY
Reel/Frame 064282/0288 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17066929 · Oct 9, 2020
Related Publication 20230337566A1 · Oct 26, 2023
References Cited (41)
US 4475380A · Colovas · 1984 [cited by examiner]
US 5995895A · Watt · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 8972090B2 · Weslati · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 10053100B2 · Foster · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10315655B2 · Blank · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11592822B2 · Vandike · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20030139859A1 · Hanada · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030169001A1 · Murakami · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20070261648A1 · Reckels · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080063473A1 · Congdon · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090056651A1 · Frelich · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100217516A1 · Diekhans et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110072782A1 · Ozawa · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110309926A1 · Eikelenberg · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20130089375A1 · Noll · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130146377A1 · Adamson · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130274952A1 · Weslati · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140060099A1 · Kitaoka · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140091579A1 · Kitamura · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160212939A1 · Ouchida · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160247395A1 · Sugihara · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160339898A1 · Kamado · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160360697A1 · Diaz · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170096931A1 · Beichner · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170196171A1 · Xu et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180077865A1 · Gallmeier · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180092295A1 · Sugumaran · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190277176A1 · Nakayama · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200093053A1 · Ehlert · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200128734A1 · Brammeier · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200128737A1 · Anderson · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200193342A1 · Selvaraj · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210029877A1 · Vandike · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210054776A1 · Steinmetz · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210132577A1 · Matzelle · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210249935A1 · Long · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220110236A1 · Vandike · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220110237A1 · Vandike et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220155183A1 · Worden · 2022 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2021262500A1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
Prosecution History in U.S. Appl. No. 17/066,929 including: Application and Drawings filed Oct. 9, 2020, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2022, Non Final Ofice Action dated Mar. 30, 2023, and Notice of Allowance da… [cited by applicant]