IP Library Granted Patent US 12,318,999
Granted Patent B2
US 12,318,999 · App. 18/390,403 · Granted Jun 3, 2025

Multiple image projection system and method for additive manufacturing

Inventors: Ben Wynne (Escondido, CA); Jamie Lynn Etcheson (San Diego, CA); Christopher Sean Tanner (Idyllwild, CA); Robert Lee Mueller (San Diego, CA); Ivan Dejesus Chousal (Chula Vista, CA)
Assignee: Intrepid Automation, Inc.
B29C64/268B29C64/129B29C64/135B29C64/291B33Y10/00B33Y30/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,318,999
App. No.
18/390,403
Granted
Jun 3, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An additive manufacturing system, and associated methods, comprise an image projection system comprising a plurality of image projectors that project a composite image onto a build area within a resin pool. The composite image comprises a plurality of sub-images arranged in an array. The properties of a sub-image and the alignment of the position of the sub image within the composite image can be adjusted using a set of filters comprising an irradiance mask that normalizes irradiance, and a gamma adjustment mask that adjusts sub-image energy based on a reactivity of the resin.

Claims (30)

1. A method comprising:

controlling an image projection system of an additive manufacturing system using an image display subsystem, wherein the image projection system comprises a plurality of image projectors;

projecting a composite image onto a build area within a resin pool of the additive manufacturing system using the image projection system, wherein the composite image comprises a plurality of sub-images arranged in an array, and wherein the projecting the composite image comprises projecting each sub-image onto a portion of the build area using one of the plurality of image projectors; and

adjusting properties and aligning a position of a sub-image in the array using a set of filters comprising:

an irradiance mask that normalizes irradiance; and

a gamma adjustment mask that adjusts sub-image energy based on a reactivity of resin in the resin pool.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the gamma adjustment mask adjusts the sub-image energy by mapping a plurality of pixel intensity levels to an addressable range of reactivity for curing the resin of the resin pool.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the image display subsystem controls the image projection system and each of the image projectors using digital light processing.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the irradiance mask additionally adjusts the sub-image energy across the build area to compensate for non-uniformities in optics of the plurality of image projectors.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the gamma adjustment mask comprises a logarithmic relationship between a cure depth of the resin and the sub-image energy per unit area in the build area.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the resin is selected from acrylates, epoxies, methacrylates, urethanes, silicone, vinyls, and combinations thereof.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein two or more adjacent sub-images in the array overlap, and wherein the set of filters further comprises an edge blending bar.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the edge blending bar comprises a blending distance and a function selected from linear, sigmoid and geometric.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein the edge blending bar adjusts one or more sub-image edges based on at least one layer boundary location within an object being manufactured.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising a system controller that synchronizes exposure control of the plurality of image projectors with each other.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the adjusting properties and aligning the position of the sub-image in the array further comprises applying the irradiance mask to the sub-image such that the composite image has a uniform irradiance range across the composite image.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the adjusting properties and aligning the position of the sub-image in the array further comprises applying the irradiance mask to the sub-image to normalize irradiance non-uniformities within the image projection system arising from a projector-based spatial energy non-uniformity.

13. An additive manufacturing system, comprising:

an image projection system comprising a plurality of image projectors that project a composite image onto a build area within a resin pool, wherein each of the image projectors projects a sub-image onto a portion of the build area, wherein the composite image comprises a plurality of sub-images arranged in an array;

a display subsystem, wherein the display subsystem controls the image projection system, and wherein the display subsystem controls an image projector of the plurality of image projectors to adjust properties and alignment of a position of a sub-image in the array; and

a set of filters configured to adjust the properties of the sub-image in the array, the set of filters comprising:

an irradiance mask that normalizes irradiance; and

a gamma adjustment mask that adjusts sub-image energy based on a reactivity of resin in the resin pool.

14. The additive manufacturing system of claim 13 , wherein the irradiance mask additionally adjusts the sub-image energy across the build area to compensate for non-uniformities in optics of the plurality of image projectors.

15. The additive manufacturing system of claim 13 , wherein the gamma adjustment mask adjusts the sub-image energy by mapping a plurality of pixel intensity levels to an addressable range of reactivity for curing the resin of the resin pool.

16. The additive manufacturing system of claim 15 , wherein the plurality of pixel intensity levels comprises levels from 0 to 255.

17. The additive manufacturing system of claim 13 , wherein the gamma adjustment mask further comprises a transfer function that maps an operating energy range of a printed layer to a control system operating range, wherein the control system operating range is a quantized set of values.

18. The additive manufacturing system of claim 13 , wherein the gamma adjustment mask comprises a logarithmic relationship between a cure depth of the resin and the sub-image energy per unit area in the build area.

19. The additive manufacturing system of claim 13 , further comprising the resin pool, wherein the resin of the resin pool is selected from a group consisting of acrylates, epoxies, methacrylates, urethanes, silicone, vinyls, and combinations thereof.

20. The additive manufacturing system of claim 13 , wherein two or more adjacent sub-images in the array overlap, wherein the set of filters further comprises an edge blending bar, and wherein the edge blending bar comprises a blending distance and a function selected from a group consisting of linear, sigmoid and geometric.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 23, 2024
From: INTREPID AUTOMATION, INC.
To: MASON M. EVANS FAMILY TRUST
Reel/Frame 066213/0390 →
MERGER Recorded Jan 9, 2024
From: INTREPID AUTOMATION
To: INTREPID AUTOMATION, INC.
Reel/Frame 066242/0218 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 22, 2023
From: WYNNE, BEN; ETCHESON, JAMIE LYNN; TANNER, CHRISTOPHER SEAN; MUELLER, ROBERT LEE; CHOUSAL, IVAN DEJESUS
To: INTREPID AUTOMATION
Reel/Frame 065944/0900 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation 17661856 · May 3, 2022
Continuation 17301204 · Mar 29, 2021
Continuation 16938298 · Jul 24, 2020
Continuation 16370337 · Mar 29, 2019
Provisional Application 62734003 · Sep 20, 2018
Provisional Application 62711719 · Jul 30, 2018
Related Publication 20240116247A1 · Apr 11, 2024
References Cited (90)
US 4575330A · Hull · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 5258146A · Almquist et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5554336A · Hull · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5569431A · Hull · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5902537A · Almquist et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6416185B1 · Smith · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6456339B1 · Surati et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6616263B2 · Allen et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6652061B2 · Allen et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6916079B2 · Allen et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7079157B2 · Deering · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7215362B2 · Klose · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7270426B2 · Miyazawa · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7318718B2 · Ueno · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7443364B2 · Damera-Venkata et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7559658B2 · Kamiya et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7742011B2 · Damera-Venkata et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7907792B2 · Harville · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8142026B2 · Aufranc et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8666142B2 · Shkolnik et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8766998B1 · Morgan, III et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9453142B2 · Rolland et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9497447B2 · Green et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9914266B2 · Ueda et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9930307B1 · Kursula et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10532554B2 · Tanner · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10647055B2 · Wynne et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10723078B2 · Cooper · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10773510B2 · Wynne et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11054808B2 · Wynne et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11584085B2 · Wynne et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11760032B2 · Tanner · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20070104361A1 · Alexander · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080169586A1 · Hull et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100271608A1 · Schlienger et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20140140627A1 · Wu et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140226167A1 · Smith et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150137426A1 · Esbroeck et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150147424A1 · Bibas · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150202805A1 · Saruhashi et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160121547A1 · Kobayashi · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160368221A1 · Ueda et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170102679A1 · Greene et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170283766A1 · Hribar et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170318186A1 · Morovic et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180139426A1 · Ueda · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180236710A1 · Turner · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180322621A1 · Craeghs et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180345594A1 · Tanner · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190118481A1 · Brown · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190134899A1 · Mueller et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190210289A1 · Frantzdale et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200001541A1 · Eiriksson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200292415A1 · Goldman et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210016394A1 · McCarthy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
AU 2008243078A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 104015363A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104669621A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 104669625A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 205238580U · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 104015363B · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 106273487A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016179661A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017165832A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017210298A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018097954A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Bimber et al, “Multifocal projection: a multiprojector technique for increasing focal depth,” in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 658-667, Jul.-Aug. 2006, doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2… [cited by applicant]
Brown and Lowe, “Automatic panoramic image stitching using invariant features.” International journal of computer vision, 74 (Aug. 2007): 59-73. [cited by applicant]
Camano et al “Materials characterization for stereolithography.” High Value Manufacturing: Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advanced Research in Virt… [cited by applicant]
Garcia-Dorado and Cooperstock, “Fully automatic multi-projector calibration with an uncalibrated camera,” CVPR 2011 Workshop, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, Jul. 2011, pp. 29-36, doi: 10.1109/CVPRW.2011.5981726. [cited by applicant]
Harville et al, “Practical Methods for Geometric and Photometric Correction of Tiled Projector,” 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'06), New York, NY, USA, Jul. 2006, pp. 5-5, doi… [cited by applicant]
Jacobs, Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing, Fundamentals of StereoLithography (1992), Chapters 2, 10, and 11. [cited by applicant]
Lewis, Applied Optimal Control & Estimation (1992), Chapter 1. [cited by applicant]
Majumber er al. Practical Multi-Projector Display Design (2007), Chapters 1-4, B and C. [cited by applicant]
Quang, et al, “Auto-focusing technique in a projector-camera system,” 2008 10th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision, Hanoi, Dec. 2008, pp. 1914-1919, doi: 10.1109/ICARCV.2008.4795821. [cited by applicant]
Song et al, “A new edge blending paradigm for multi-projector tiled display wall,” 2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM 2010), Taiyuan, Oct. 2010, pp. V5-349-V5-352, doi: 10.… [cited by applicant]
Xu et al, “Influence of recoating parameters on thickness of resin layer in high-resolution stereolithography system.” Advanced Materials Research 189 (Feb. 2011): 3697-3700. [cited by applicant]
Zhou et al “Parametric process optimization to improve the accuracy of rapid prototyped stereolithography parts.” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 40.3 (Feb. 2000): 363-379. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 3, 2022 for European Patent Application No. 19843981.2. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 11, 2022 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/IB2022/056959. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report dated Nov. 8, 2019 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US19/43305. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance and Fees dated Jan. 28, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/301,204. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance and Fees dated Sep. 27, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/661,856. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 15, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,298. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 29, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/370,337. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2022 for China Patent Application No. 201980051272.5. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/370,337. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/661,856. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/938,298. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/301,204. [cited by applicant]