IP Library Granted Patent US 12,466,569
Granted Patent B2
US 12,466,569 · App. 18/441,489 · Granted Nov 11, 2025

Method for controlling a multi-engine rotary-wing aircraft with reduced fuel consumption on the ground

Inventors: Bernard Krier (Carry-Le-Rouet, FR); Ivan Chassagne (Franqueville-St-Pierre, FR)
Assignee: AIRBUS HELICOPTERS
B64D31/04
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,466,569
App. No.
18/441,489
Granted
Nov 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for controlling an aircraft having at least two engines burning fuel and a transmission system connected to a rotary wing, each engine having a power shaft connected to the transmission system. An energy-saving phase comprises at least one energy-saving period comprising controlling, at an active rating, with a control system, one active engine from the at least two engines, and using the control system to stop or control, at an inactive rating, each inactive engine from the at least two engines that is not the active engine.

Claims (32)

1 . A method for controlling an aircraft with a rotary wing, the aircraft having a power plant comprising at least two engines burning fuel and a transmission system connected to the rotary wing, each engine having a power shaft connected to the transmission system, the method comprising an energy-saving phase applicable on the ground and comprising at least one energy-saving period, this energy-saving period comprising controlling, at an active rating, with a control system, one active engine from the at least two engines, in order to ensure rotation of the rotary wing, the active engine producing, at the active rating and with its power shaft, a non-zero active driving power, the energy-saving period comprising, together with the control of the active engine at the active rating, use of the control system to stop or control, at an inactive rating, each inactive engine from the at least two engines that is not the active engine, the inactive engine at the inactive rating producing, with its power shaft, a non-zero power that is less than the active driving power or zero power,

wherein the energy-saving phase comprises at least two alternating operating phases, each alternating operating phase comprising an energy-saving period and a joint operation period, the joint operation period comprising controlling the engines at the active rating with the control system.

2 . The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the method comprises activating the energy-saving phase by means of a human-machine selection interface of the control system.

3 . The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein, the control system comprising, for each engine, a human-machine starting interface specific to this engine configured to prompt, at the choice of a pilot, the stopping of the engine and the application of an idle rating and the application of at least one flight rating to be reached during flight, the method comprises, prior to the energy-saving phase: controlling the active engine, with the control system, at the idle rating set with the human-machine starting interface of this active engine; or controlling the engines, with the control system, at the idle rating set with the respective human-machine starting interfaces.

4 . The method according to claim 2 ,

wherein, the control system comprising, for each engine, a human-machine starting interface specific to this engine configured to prompt, at the choice of a pilot, the stopping of the engine and the application of an idle rating and the application of at least one flight rating to be reached during flight, the method comprises, prior to the energy-saving phase: controlling the active engine, with the control system, at the idle rating set with the human-machine starting interface of this active engine; or controlling the engines, with the control system, at the idle rating set with the respective human-machine starting interfaces, and wherein the human-machine selection interface is separate from the human-machine starting interfaces.

5 . The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein, each engine being able to operate at an idle rating, enabling a non-zero idle power to be produced with its power shaft, and at at least one flight rating enabling a flight power greater than the idle power to be produced with its power shaft, the active rating is the idle rating.

6 . The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the energy-saving period comprises at least one of the following steps: controlling the rotary wing in order to taxi the aircraft on the ground; opening a door to embark or disembark at least one passenger or goods on the ground; and a waiting step wherein no control interface of the aircraft is operated by a crew.

7 . The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein each of the energy-saving period and joint operation period is applied for a predetermined time period.

8 . The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the inactive engine produces different powers with its power shaft in the two energy-saving periods of the two alternating operating phases.

9 . The method according to claim 8 ,

wherein, when the aircraft is started up, the energy-saving phase comprises a first alternating operating phase and one or more second alternating operating phases, the inactive engine being switched off by the control system during the first alternating operating phase and switched to the inactive rating during the second alternating operating phase or phases.

10 . The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the energy-saving phase is a pre-take-off phase at a start of a mission, or an intermediate phase on the ground during a mission or an end-of-mission phase.

11 . The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the energy-saving phase is a pre-take-off phase at a start of a mission comprising a single energy-saving period followed by a single joint operation period, or several alternating operating phases each comprising an energy-saving period followed by a joint operation period.

12 . The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the energy-saving phase is an end-of-mission phase comprising a single joint operation period followed by a single energy-saving period, or several alternating operating phases each comprising a joint operation period followed by an energy-saving period.

13 . The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the energy-saving phase is an intermediate phase on the ground during a mission comprising a joint operation period after landing followed by one or more alternating operating phases comprising a joint operation period followed by an energy-saving period.

14 . The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the method comprises a take-off phase comprising controlling each engine at a flight rating with the control system, each engine producing, with its power shaft, a driving power greater than an idle power.

15 . The method according to claim 14 ,

wherein the method comprises activation by a human of the take-off phase with a human-machine starting interface of the control system, in order to control the engines according to a flight rating.

16 . An aircraft with a rotary wing, the aircraft having a power plant comprising at least two engines burning fuel and a transmission system connected to the rotary wing, each engine having a power shaft connected to the transmission system,

wherein the aircraft comprises a control system configured to apply the method according to claim 1 .

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 6, 2024
From: KRIER, BERNARD; CHASSAGNE, IVAN
To: AIRBUS HELICOPTERS
Reel/Frame 066669/0439 →
Priority Claims (1)
FR 2303657 · Apr 13, 2023 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240343404A1 · Oct 17, 2024
References Cited (20)
US 10112723B2 · Rossotto · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10214296B2 · Mercier-Calvairac · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11554874B2 · Drolet · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11663863B2 · Manoukian · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11725595B2 · Coutu · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11732643B2 · Ng · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11859563B2 · Ng · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20060000300A1 · Vialle · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20130219905A1 · Marconi et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140145028A1 · Gomez · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160237917A1 · Marconi et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180187604A1 · Poumarede et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20240343404A1 · Krier · 2024 [cited by examiner]
EP 2735512A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
FR 2871138A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
FR 2967132B1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
FR 2967133B1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
FR 3001525A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
FR 3011587A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
French Search Report for French Application No. FR2303657, Completed by the French Patent Office, Dated Oct. 4, 2023, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]