IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,549,343
Granted Patent B2
US 12,549,343 · App. 18/597,258 · Granted Feb 10, 2026

Quantum key distribution system to overcome intercept-resend and detector-control quantum hacking

Inventors: Salem F. Hegazy (Giza, EG); Bahaa E. A. Saleh (Orlando, FL)
Assignee: University of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc.
H04L9/0858H04L9/0819
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,549,343
App. No.
18/597,258
Granted
Feb 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A quantum key distribution system may include a transceiver including a state randomizer to impart a random state transformation to one or more qubits of a generated faint pulse and a quantum bit encoder to reflect the faint pulse back to the transceiver with one or more encoded bits. The transceiver may receive a return pulse through the communication channel, where the state randomizer reverses the random state transformation. The transceiver may include a set of two detectors to measure the return pulse at time-gated timeslots associated with possible paths of the return pulse. Reception of the faint pulse from the quantum bit encoder as the return pulse triggers a detector in one or more known time-gated timeslots determined based on the random state transformation, while reception of a faked-state pulse results in a non-zero probability of triggering of a detector in a different time-gated timeslot.

Claims (51)

1 . A system comprising:

a transceiver comprising:

a light source configured to generate a faint pulse;

a state randomizer configured to impart a random state transformation to one or more qubits associated with the faint pulse prior to transmission of the faint pulse over a communication channel;

a quantum bit encoder comprising:

a modulator configured to encode one or more encoded bits on the faint pulse received over the communication channel; and

a mirror to reflect the faint pulse back to the transceiver;

wherein the transceiver is further configured to receive a return pulse through the communication channel, wherein the state randomizer is configured to apply an inverse of the random state transformation to the return pulse;

wherein the transceiver further comprises a set of two detectors configured to measure the return pulse associated with possible paths of the return pulse through the transceiver;

wherein reception of the faint pulse from the quantum bit encoder as the return pulse triggers a detector in the set of two detectors in one or more known time-gated timeslots determined based on the random state transformation imparted by the state randomizer; and

wherein reception of a faked-state pulse from a third party as the return pulse results in a non-zero probability of triggering of a detector in the set of two detectors in a different time-gated timeslot.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the transceiver further comprises:

a state converter configured to convert the faint pulse from a first state of one or more degrees of freedom of the faint pulse to a second state, wherein the state randomizer applies the random state transformation to the second state of the faint pulse.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the transceiver further comprises:

a state converter including an interferometer, wherein the state converter is configured to convert the faint pulse from a polarization-path state to a time-polarization state with a leading time bin and a lagging time bin, wherein the state randomizer comprises a polarization randomizer to receive the faint pulse from the state converter, wherein the polarization randomizer applies a random polarization transformation to the faint pulse.

4 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the modulator comprises:

a phase modulator configured to apply a differential phase shift between the leading time bin and the lagging time bin of the faint pulse as the one or more encoded bits.

5 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the state converter includes a polarization converter in an arm of the interferometer to rotate light within the arm to an orthogonal polarization.

6 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the state converter includes an additional phase modulator in one arm of the interferometer, wherein the additional phase modulator leaves the faint pulse from the light source to be transmitted to the quantum bit encoder unchanged, wherein the additional phase modulator imparts a phase shift between the leading time bin and the lagging time bin of the return pulse.

7 . The system of claim 6 , wherein the phase shift imparted by the additional phase modulator is associated with an encoding basis, wherein the phase shift is one of 0 or π on a first basis and one of π/2 or 3π/2 on a second basis, wherein the encoding basis is one of the first basis or the second basis.

8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the transceiver determines an encoded bit of the one or more encoded bits provided by the quantum bit encoder if a measurement basis matches the encoding basis used by the phase modulator in the quantum bit encoder.

9 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the set of two detectors are configured to measure polarization in a diagonal basis relative to the encoding basis.

10 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the transceiver determines an encoded bit of the one or more encoded bits provided by the quantum bit encoder based on which detector in the set of two detectors is triggered along with an associated one of the known time-gated timeslots.

11 . The system of claim 10 , wherein at least one of the transceiver or the quantum bit encoder utilize the encoded bit when generating an encryption key.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein at least one of the transceiver or the quantum bit encoder utilize the encoded bit when generating the encryption key using a BB84 protocol.

13 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the mirror is a Faraday mirror, wherein the Faraday mirror rotates a polarization of the faint pulse to an orthogonal state.

14 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the polarization randomizer is a reciprocal polarization randomizer with a continuum of possible random realizations based on a Haar measure.

15 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the polarization randomizer maintains the random polarization transformation during a round-trip time of the faint pulse between the transceiver and the quantum bit encoder.

16 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the polarization randomizer provides the random polarization transformation for a set of time windows, wherein constituent windows in the set of time windows are separated by a round-trip time of the faint pulse between the transceiver and the quantum bit encoder and synchronized with the transmission of the faint pulse by the transceiver.

17 . The system of claim 16 , wherein the polarization randomizer provides additional polarization transformations for additional sets of time windows, wherein the constituent windows in the set of time windows are separated by the round-trip time, where the additional sets of time windows are synchronized to additional faint pulses transmitted by the transceiver.

18 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the transceiver further includes a polarization switch between the polarization randomizer and the state converter, wherein the polarization switch leaves a polarization of the faint pulse to be transmitted to the quantum bit encoder unchanged, wherein the polarization switch applies an additional random polarization transformation to the faint pulse, wherein the additional random polarization transformation includes one of passing the faint pulse unmodified or rotating polarization by 90 degrees.

19 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a circulator to receive the faint pulse from the light source and direct the faint pulse to the state randomizer, wherein the circulator further receives the return pulse from the state randomizer along at least one of the possible paths and directs the return pulse to at least one of the set of two detectors.

20 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

an optical attenuator to decrease an intensity of light provided by the light source to provide the faint pulse.

21 . A system comprising:

a quantum key distribution (QKD) system comprising:

a transceiver comprising:

a light source configured to generate a faint pulse;

a state randomizer configured to impart a random state transformation to one or more qubits associated with the faint pulse prior to transmission of the faint pulse through a communication channel;

a quantum bit encoder comprising:

a modulator configured to encode an encoded bit on the faint pulse received through the communication channel; and

a mirror to reflect the faint pulse back to the transceiver;

wherein the transceiver is further configured to receive a return pulse through the communication channel, wherein the state randomizer is configured to apply an inverse of the random state transformation to the return pulse;

wherein the transceiver further comprises a set of two detectors configured to measure the return pulse at time-gated timeslots associated with possible paths of the return pulse through the transceiver;

wherein reception of the faint pulse from the quantum bit encoder as the return pulse triggers a detector in the set of two detectors in one or more known time-gated timeslots determined based on the random state transformation imparted by the state randomizer; and

wherein reception of a faked-state pulse from a third party as the return pulse results in a non-zero probability of triggering of a detector in the set of two detectors in a different time-gated timeslot;

wherein the transceiver determines the encoded bit based on which detector in the set of two detectors is triggered along with an associated one of the known time-gated timeslots; and

wherein the faint pulse is one of a series of faint pulses, wherein encoded bit is one of a series of encoded bits associated with the series of faint pulses, wherein at least one of the transceiver or the quantum bit encoder generate an encryption key based on the series of encoded bits;

a first client to encrypt data based on the encryption key and transmit the encrypted data across an additional communication channel; and

a second client to decrypt data received over the communication channel based on the encryption key.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 8, 2024
From: HEGAZY, SALEM F.; SALEH, BAHAA E. A.
To: UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC.
Reel/Frame 067039/0056 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation In Part 18093723 · Jan 5, 2023
Provisional Application 63296711 · Jan 5, 2022
Related Publication 20250007702A1 · Jan 2, 2025
References Cited (34)
US 9071425B2 · Yuan · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 10020937B2 · Legre et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11451308B1 · Bucklew · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20200067704A1 · Zbinden · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210133614A1 · Ashrafi · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 1672171A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
CN 1989447A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
KR 20230066344A · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004105289A2 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012046135A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021090024A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022039818A2 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022092815A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022124606A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Braunstein, Samuel L. et al., “Side-channel-free quantum key distribution.” Physical review letters 108.13 (2012): 130502. [cited by applicant]
Bugge, Audun Nystad, et al. “Laser damage helps the eavesdropper in quantum cryptography.” Physical review letters 112.7 (2014): 070503. [cited by applicant]
Da Silva, Thiago Ferreira, et al. “Real-time monitoring of single-photon detectors against eavesdropping in quantum key distribution systems.” Optics express 20.17 (2012): 18911-18924. [cited by applicant]
Gerhardt, Ilja, et al. “Full-field implementation of a perfect eavesdropper on a quantum cryptography system.” Nature communications 2.1 (2011): 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Hegazy, Salem F., Salah SA Obayya, and Bahaa EA Saleh. “Randomized ancillary qubit overcomes detector-control and intercept-resend hacking of quantum key distribution.” Journal of Lightwave Technology 40.21 (2022): 6995… [cited by applicant]
Huang, Anqi, et al. “Testing random-detector-efficiency countermeasure in a commercial system reveals a breakable unrealistic assumption.” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 52.11 (2016): 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Lim, Charles Ci Wen, et al. “Random variation of detector efficiency: A countermeasure against detector blinding attacks for quantum key distribution.” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 21.3 (2015):… [cited by applicant]
Lo, Hoi-Kwong, et al., “Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution.” Physical review letters 108.13 (2012): 130503. [cited by applicant]
Lydersen, L., et al., Thermal blinding of gated detectors in quantum cryptography. Opt. express 18, 27938-27954 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Lydersen, Lars, et al. “Hacking commercial quantum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumination.” Nature photonics 4.10 (2010): 686-689. [cited by applicant]
Lydersen, Lars, et al. “Superlinear threshold detectors in quantum cryptography.” Physical Review A 84.3 (2011): 032320. [cited by applicant]
Qian, Yong-Jun, et al. “Robust countermeasure against detector control attack in a practical quantum key distribution system.” Optica 6.9 (2019): 1178-1184. [cited by applicant]
Sauge, Sebastien, et al. “Controlling an actively-quenched single photon detector with bright light.” Optics Express 19.23 (2011): 23590-23600. [cited by applicant]
Stucki, Damien, et al. “Quantum key distribution over 67 km with a plug&play system.” New Journal of Physics 4.1 (2002): 41. [cited by applicant]
Wiechers, Carlos, et al. “After-gate attack on a quantum cryptosystem.” New Journal of Physics 13.1 (2011): 013043. [cited by applicant]
Wu, Zhihao, et al. “Hacking single-photon avalanche detectors in quantum key distribution via pulse illumination.” Optics Express 28.17 (2020): 25574-25590. [cited by applicant]
Wu, Zhihao, et al. “Robust countermeasure against detector control attack in a practical quantum key distribution system: comment.” Optica 7.10 (2020): 1391-1393. [cited by applicant]
Xu, Feihu, et al. “Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices.” Reviews of Modern Physics 92.2 (2020): 025002. [cited by applicant]
Yuan, Z. L., J. F. Dynes, and A. J. Shields. “Resilience of gated avalanche photodiodes against bright illumination attacks in quantum cryptography.” Applied physics letters 98.23 (2011): 231104. [cited by applicant]
Yuan, Z. L., James F. Dynes, and Andrew J. Shields. “Avoiding the blinding attack in QKD.” Nature Photonics 4.12 (2010): 800-801. [cited by applicant]