IP Library Granted Patent US 12,291,251
Granted Patent B2
US 12,291,251 · App. 18/666,128 · Granted May 6, 2025

Rail authority system and/or method

Inventors: Patrick Dunn (Los Angeles, CA); Benjamin Stuart Stabler (Los Angeles, CA); Marc Greenbaum (Los Angeles, CA); Babatunde Ogunfemi (Los Angeles, CA)
Assignee: Parallel Systems, Inc.
B61L27/16B61L27/12B61L27/18
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,291,251
App. No.
18/666,128
Granted
May 6, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The system 100 can include: a railroad integration system, a motion planner, a vehicle controller, an optional user interface (UI), an optional fleet management system, and an optional track data system. However, the system 100 can additionally or alternatively include any other suitable set of components. The system functions to facilitate vehicle control and/or manage authority within a rail network.

Claims (35)

1. A positive train control (PTC) method comprising:

at a first computing system, determining a motion plan for an autonomous rail agent based on a set of track rules for a track; and

based on the motion plan and a state of the autonomous rail agent, commanding the autonomous rail agent by broadcasting a first command to the autonomous rail agent; and

maintaining an exclusive track reservation for the autonomous rail agent based on the first command, wherein the exclusive track reservation is dynamically sized; and

at a second computing system:

autonomously controlling the autonomous rail agent, within the exclusive track reservation, based on the first command; and

providing the state of the autonomous rail agent to the first computing system.

2. The PTC method of claim 1 , further comprising, while autonomously controlling the autonomous rail agent within the exclusive track reservation:

based on the motion plan and an updated state of the autonomous rail agent, commanding the autonomous rail agent by broadcasting second command to the autonomous rail agent; and

maintaining the exclusive track reservation for the autonomous rail agent based on both the first command and the second command.

3. The PTC method of claim 2 , further comprising: in response to receipt of the second command at the second computing system, autonomously controlling the autonomous rail agent within the exclusive track reservation based on the second command.

4. The PTC method of claim 1 , wherein the exclusive track reservation is dynamically sized based on the first command.

5. The PTC method of claim 4 , wherein the exclusive track reservation is dynamically sized in time.

6. The PTC method of claim 4 , wherein the exclusive track reservation is dynamically sized in space.

7. The PTC method of claim 1 , wherein the exclusive track reservation is dynamically sized based on the set of track rules.

8. The PTC method of claim 1 , wherein the exclusive track reservation is dynamically sized based on a predetermined set of rules associated with a map of signal connectivity.

9. The PTC method of claim 8 , wherein the exclusive track reservation is dynamically sized to span a tunnel.

10. The PTC method of claim 1 , wherein the command is periodically broadcast within a time interval associated with the first command, wherein the exclusive track reservations are dynamically sized based on the time interval.

11. The PTC method of claim 1 , wherein the motion plan comprises linearized coordinates along a series of track segments, wherein the exclusive track reservation comprises a granular sub-region of track within the series of track segments.

12. The PTC method of claim 1 , wherein the second computing system is configured to autonomously control the vehicle to stop within the exclusive track reservation in response to a communication failure between the first computing system and the second computing system.

13. The PTC method of claim 1 , wherein the autonomous rail agent is commanded based on a heartbeat mechanism, wherein the exclusive track reservation is maintained based on a heartbeat mechanism.

14. The PTC method of claim 13 , wherein the heartbeat mechanism comprises the broadcast of the first command.

15. The PTC method of claim 1 , further comprising: at the first computing system, determining a track warrant for a least one railroad authority, wherein the motion plan is determined based on the track warrant.

16. A system for positive train control (PTC) along a track comprising:

a motion planner configured to:

determine a motion plan for an autonomous rail vehicle based on a set of track rules of the track;

based on the motion plan and a state of the autonomous rail vehicle, command the autonomous rail agent by periodically broadcasting commands to the autonomous rail agent; and

maintain an exclusive track reservation for the autonomous rail agent based on the commands, wherein the exclusive track reservation is dynamically determined based on the commands; and

a vehicle controller of the autonomous rail vehicle which is communicatively coupled to the centralized motion planner and configured to:

autonomously control the autonomous rail vehicle, within the exclusive track reservation, based on the commands; and

provide the state of the autonomous rail vehicle to the centralized motion planner.

17. The system for PTC of claim 16 , wherein the exclusive track reservation is dynamically sized in space.

18. The system for PTC of claim 16 , wherein the exclusive track reservation is dynamically sized based on an expiration parameter.

19. The system for PTC of claim 16 , wherein the exclusive track reservation is dynamically sized based on the set of track rules.

20. The system for PTC of claim 16 , wherein the exclusive track reservation is dynamically determined based on track geometry constraints.

Assignments (3)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 19, 2025
From: FIRST-CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY (FKA: SILICON VALLEY BANK)
To: PARALLEL SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 072062/0201 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 10, 2024
From: PARALLEL SYSTEMS, INC.
To: FIRST-CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 069535/0009 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 10, 2024
From: DUNN, PATRICK; STABLER, BENJAMIN STUART; GREENBAUM, MARC; OGUNFEMI, BABATUNDE
To: PARALLEL SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 067677/0628 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 18373225 · Sep 26, 2023
Provisional Application 63423355 · Nov 7, 2022
Provisional Application 63410031 · Sep 26, 2022
Related Publication 20240300556A1 · Sep 12, 2024
References Cited (38)
US 3848533A · Grow · 1974 [cited by applicant]
US 11305796B1 · Shue · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20040006413A1 · Kane · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20090184211A1 · Groves, Jr. · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20120203419A1 · Tucker et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20160368495A1 · Luther et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160375888A1 · Allwardt · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170108876A1 · Mullan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170320507A1 · Denny · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180079436A1 · Fifield · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180231972A1 · Woon et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180339719A1 · Loughlin · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190054929A1 · Yao et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190176862A1 · Kumar et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190281052A1 · Lekkas · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190389498A1 · Grimm et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210094567A1 · Imai et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210094597A1 · Rush et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210132625A1 · Gillett · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210188332A1 · Brooks et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210291883A1 · Gotlund et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220137623A1 · Goyal et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220185350A1 · Kindt · 2022 [cited by examiner]
CA 3074977A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP 6851278B2 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017211593A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018026615A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018054616A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022192795A2 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Dunn, Patrick , et al., “Rail Authority System and/or Method”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/373,225, filed Sep. 26, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Dunn, Patrick , et al., “Rail Control System and/or Method”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/499,034, filed Oct. 31, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Dunn, Patrick , et al., “System and/or Method for Remote Operation of a Rail Vehicle”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/514,946, filed Nov. 20, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Fraga-Lamas, Paula , et al., “Towards the Internet of Smart Trains: A Review on Industrial IoT Connected Railways”, Sensors, Jun. 21, 2017, URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/17/6/1457. [cited by applicant]
Greenbaum, Marc , et al., “Railway Switch Management System and/or Method”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/672,864, filed May 23, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Pendleton, Scott Drew, et al., “Perception, Planning, Control, and Coordination for Autonomous Vehicles”, Google Scholar, M DPI Machines, Feb. 2017, pp. 1-54. (Year: 2017). [cited by applicant]
Sanaei , et al., “Interface for a Railway Control System”, Chalmers University of Technology, Dec. 13, 2011, <URL: http://odr.chalmers.se/bitstreams/fcb1915c-254a-4c15-b364 66d99a4c2167/download>. [cited by applicant]
Singh, Prashant , “Deployment of Autonomous Trains in Rail Transportation: Current Trends and Existing Challenges”, Google Scholar , IEEE Access, vol. 9, Jun. 2021, pp. 91427-91461. (Year: 2021). [cited by applicant]
Dunn, Patrick , et al., “Remote Rail Monitoring System and/or Method”, U.S. Appl. No. 18/776,069, filed Jul. 17, 2024. [cited by applicant]