IP Library Granted Patent US 12,533,749
Granted Patent B2
US 12,533,749 · App. 18/673,653 · Granted Jan 27, 2026

Methods for tailoring the magnetic permeability of soft magnets, and soft magnets obtained therefrom

Inventors: Amber Sucich (Calabasas, CA); Eric Clough (Santa Monica, CA); Brennan Yahata (Santa Barbara, CA); Darby Laplant (Ventura, CA)
Assignee: HRL Laboratories, LLC
B23K26/342B22F10/28B33Y10/00H01F1/147B22F2998/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,533,749
App. No.
18/673,653
Granted
Jan 27, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Some variations provide a method of tailoring the surface of a soft magnet, comprising: depositing an austenite-phase-stabilizing donor material on one or more first surface regions of a ferromagnetic receiver material; not depositing the austenite-phase-stabilizing donor material on one or more second surface regions of the ferromagnetic receiver material; laser melting the austenite-phase-stabilizing donor material into the first surface regions; and solidifying the molten austenite-phase-stabilizing donor material within the first surface regions, thereby selectively alloying the ferromagnetic receiver material in the first surface regions. Laser ablation may be utilized instead of laser melting. The first surface regions have a significantly higher magnetic permeability, following the selective alloying of the donor material, compared to the second surface regions. Soft magnets with surface-tailored magnetic permeability are provided by this technology, which is demonstrated using several examples. One commercial application is selectively alloyed soft magnets for a rotor in an electric motor.

Claims (14)

1 . A soft magnet with surface-tailored magnetic permeability, wherein said soft magnet comprises:

(i) a first region comprising a first core region and a first surface region, wherein said first core region contains a ferromagnetic material, and wherein said first surface region contains an austenite-phase-stabilizing donor material; and

(ii) a second region comprising a second core region, wherein said second core region contains said ferromagnetic material, and wherein said second region does not contain said austenite-phase-stabilizing donor material;

wherein said first surface region has an average thickness from about 50 microns to about 3000 microns;

wherein in said first region, said average thickness is from about 0.1% to about 50% of a thickness of said first core region, and

wherein said first region is characterized by a first average magnetic permeability, wherein said second region is characterized by a second average magnetic permeability, and wherein said first average magnetic permeability is higher than said second average magnetic permeability.

2 . The soft magnet of claim 1 , wherein said ferromagnetic material is selected from the group consisting of FeSi, FeNi, FeCo, NiCo, FeSiAl, and combinations thereof.

3 . The soft magnet of claim 1 , wherein said austenite-phase-stabilizing donor material is selected from the group consisting of Ni, Mn, Co, Cr, Si, Mo, Nb, Ti, Mg, Cu, Al, N, C, B, and combinations thereof.

4 . The soft magnet of claim 1 , wherein said average thickness is from about 100 microns to about 500 microns.

5 . The soft magnet of claim 1 , wherein said first average magnetic permeability is at least 90% higher than said second average magnetic permeability.

6 . The soft magnet of claim 1 , wherein said first average magnetic permeability is at least one order of magnitude higher than said second average magnetic permeability.

7 . The soft magnet of claim 1 , wherein said first average magnetic permeability is at least two orders of magnitude higher than said second average magnetic permeability.

8 . The soft magnet of claim 1 , wherein said soft magnet contains multiple instances of said first region and/or said second region.

9 . The soft magnet of claim 1 , wherein said soft magnet is present in a rotor in an electric motor.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 26, 2024
From: SUCICH, AMBER, DR.; CLOUGH, ERIC, DR.; YAHATA, BRENNAN, DR.; LAPLANT, DARBY, DR.
To: HRL LABORATORIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 067530/0248 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 18102905 · Jan 30, 2023
Provisional Application 63329535 · Apr 11, 2022
Related Publication 20240308002A1 · Sep 19, 2024
References Cited (14)
US 8400038B2 · Smith et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9715957B2 · Wang et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10269479B2 · Simon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10692635B2 · Wang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20060177702A1 · Ajan · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20120021219A1 · Gabay et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20160133369A1 · Loginov et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160307678A1 · Unosson et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170154713A1 · Simon · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170187258A1 · Fujikawa et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20220037944A1 · Fatemi · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220341020A1 · Huang · 2022 [cited by examiner]
Bodziony et al., “Magnetic Study of Nanocrystalline TiB2, TiC, B4C Powders Doped to AISI 316L Austenitic Steel”, Acta Physica Polonica A, No. 1, vol. 132, pp. 62-67 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Lamichhane et al., “Additive manufacturing of soft magnets for electrical machines—a review”, Materials Today Physics 15, 100255 (2020). [cited by applicant]