IP Library Granted Patent US 12,590,942
Granted Patent B2
US 12,590,942 · App. 18/729,263 · Granted Mar 31, 2026

Mud logging of natural hydrogen

Inventors: Dariusz Strapoc (Le Plessis-Robinson, FR); Nicholas Ivars Abolins (Paris, FR); Mahdi Ammar (Clamart, FR); Aleksandar Gligorijevic (Belgrade, RS); Javier Suarez (Oklahoma City, OK); Harry Fowlow (Oklahoma City, OK)
Assignee: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
G01N33/2841E21B21/067E21B49/087G01N33/2823H01J49/0009
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,590,942
App. No.
18/729,263
Granted
Mar 31, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for estimating a quantity of natural hydrogen in a subterranean formation includes degassing drilling fluid obtained from a wellbore to obtain a gas sample including a quantity of hydrogen gas, measuring a concentration of hydrogen in the gas sample, and applying a correction to the measured concentration of hydrogen to estimate the quantity of natural hydrogen in the subterranean formation.

Claims (46)

1 . A method for estimating a natural quantity of natural hydrogen in a subterranean formation, the method comprising:

calibrating a mass spectrometer for making hydrogen measurements to obtain a calibrated mass spectrometer including a correlation between a measured hydrogen concentration and an actual hydrogen concentration;

degassing drilling fluid obtained from a wellbore to obtain a gas sample including a sample quantity of hydrogen gas;

measuring a sample concentration of sample hydrogen in the gas sample with the calibrated mass spectrometer; and

applying a correction to the sample concentration of the sample hydrogen to estimate the natural quantity of the natural hydrogen in the subterranean formation.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the degassing comprises:

drilling the wellbore in the subterranean formation;

circulating the drilling fluid in the wellbore during the drilling; and

degassing the drilling fluid during the circulating to obtain the gas sample.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the degassing further comprises:

sampling gas in a wellbore head space or a return conduit head space, the return conduit head space located between the wellbore and a mud pit; or

sampling the drilling fluid from the wellbore prior to exposure of the drilling fluid to air and degassing the sampled drilling fluid to obtain the gas sample.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating a drilling log plotting the natural quantity of the natural hydrogen in the subterranean formation with respect to measured depth in the wellbore.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the applying the correction comprises:

measuring a second gas quantity of a second gas in the obtained gas sample;

correlating the second gas quantity of the second gas with a quantity of drill bit metamorphism (DBM) hydrogen in the obtained gas sample; and

subtracting the quantity of DBM hydrogen from the sample concentration of hydrogen to compute the natural quantity of the natural hydrogen in the subterranean formation.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the second gas is selected from the group consisting of carbon monoxide, ethylene, and propylene.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the calibrating the mass spectrometer comprises flushing the mass spectrometer with air and making a background hydrogen concentration measurement; and

the method further comprises selecting the mass spectrometer for which the background hydrogen concentration measurement is less than 1000 parts per million.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein calibrating the mass spectrometer further comprises:

using the selected mass spectrometer to make hydrogen concentration measurements of corresponding first, second, and third calibration samples, the first, second, and third calibration samples having distinct first, second, and third actual hydrogen concentrations; and

evaluating a fit between the first, second, and third actual hydrogen concentrations and the first, second, and third hydrogen concentration measurements to compute the correlation.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the background hydrogen concentration measurement and the hydrogen concentration measurements of the first, second, and third calibration samples are made via evaluating a mass over charge ratio equal to two.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein calibrating the mass spectrometer includes calibrating the mass spectrometer using multi-point techniques using at least three gas mixtures having three distinct hydrogen gas concentrations.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the correlation correlates a hydrogen bias that decreases with increasing hydrogen concentration.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the hydrogen bias is associated with a background noise level.

13 . A system for estimating a natural quantity of natural hydrogen in a subterranean formation, the system comprising:

a degasser disposed to degas drilling fluid at a rig site to obtain a gas sample;

a calibrated mass spectrometer configured to measure a sample concentration of hydrogen gas and a sample quantity of a second gas in the gas sample, wherein the calibrated mass spectrometer is calibrated for making calibrated hydrogen measurements based on a correlation between a measured hydrogen concentration and an actual hydrogen concentration; and

a processor configured to evaluate the sample concentration of hydrogen gas and the sample quantity of the second gas and apply a correction to the measured concentration of hydrogen to estimate the natural quantity of the natural hydrogen in the subterranean formation.

14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

evaluate a measured quantity of the second gas to obtain a quantity of drill bit metamorphism (DBM) hydrogen; and

subtract the quantity of DBM hydrogen from the sample concentration of hydrogen gas to obtain the natural quantity of the natural hydrogen in the subterranean formation.

15 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is further configured to generate a drilling log depicting the natural quantity of the natural hydrogen in the subterranean formation and at least one of the sample concentration of hydrogen gas and the sample quantity of the second gas with respect to a depth of a wellbore penetrating the subterranean formation.

16 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the degasser is disposed to degas the drilling fluid from a wellbore penetrating the subterranean formation prior to exposure of the drilling fluid to air.

17 . A method comprising:

calibrating a mass spectrometer for making hydrogen measurements to obtain a calibrated mass spectrometer including a correlation between a measured hydrogen concentration and an actual hydrogen concentration;

obtaining a drilling fluid gas sample from a subterranean formation, the drilling fluid gas sample including a quantity of hydrogen gas;

evaluating the drilling fluid gas sample to measure, using the calibrated mass spectrometer, a sample concentration of hydrogen gas and to measure a sample quantity of a second gas in the drilling fluid gas sample;

correlating the sample quantity of the second gas with a quantity of drill bit metamorphism (DBM) hydrogen in the drilling fluid gas sample; and

applying a correction to the sample concentration of the hydrogen gas by subtracting the quantity of DBM hydrogen from the sample concentration of hydrogen gas to compute a natural quantity of natural hydrogen in the subterranean formation.

18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the second gas comprises at least one of carbon monoxide, ethylene, and propylene.

19 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the calibrated mass spectrometer has a background hydrogen concentration measurement that is less than a 1000 parts per million.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 25, 2024
From: STRAPOC, DARIUSZ; ABOLINS, NICHOLAS IVARS; AMMAR, MAHDI; GLIGORIJEVIC, ALEKSANDAR; SUAREZ, JAVIER; FOWLOW, HARRY
To: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 068083/0285 →
Priority Claims (2)
EP 22305389 · Mar 28, 2022 · regional
EP 22305620 · Apr 26, 2022 · regional
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63481189 · Jan 24, 2023
Related Publication 20250116648A1 · Apr 10, 2025
References Cited (49)
US 6230822B1 · Sullivan · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6443001B1 · Duriez et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7392138B2 · Frechin et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 11513110B2 · Rowe · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20070062272A1 · Frechin · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20100153955A1 · Sirota · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100264315A1 · Okada · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110303463A1 · Lessi · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20140231142A1 · Poitzsch · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140249053A1 · Robinson · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150322720A1 · Pelletier · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160003793A1 · Rowe · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160273330A1 · Dashevsky · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160290131A1 · Mitchell · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170074094A1 · Rowe · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170107814A1 · Dinariev · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20200056478A1 · Lima · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210285927A1 · Baecker · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220034862A1 · Fayez · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220065105A1 · Rowe · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220091090A1 · Baecker · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230099562A1 · Alarawi · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230184645A1 · Smith · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240287898A1 · Strapoc · 2024 [cited by applicant]
EP 2444802A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
EP 2824455A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010042383A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020205460A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022047444A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023278327A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023102528A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
Whitcar, M.J., 1990, A geochemical perspective of natural gas and atmospheric methane, Organic Chemistry, v. 16, 531-547, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Strapoc et al., Artificial alkenes and alkanes generated during drilling: Evidence and impact on petroleum exploration. 2017, IMOG, Florence, Italy; abstract, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Strapoc et al., Deep biogenic methane and drilling-associated gas artifacts: impact and consequences on characterization of petroleum fluids. AAPG Bulletin v 104, Apr. 2020, pp. 887-912. [cited by applicant]
Coplen et al., New Guidelines for 13C Measurements: Analytical Chemistry, v. 78, Apr. 1, 2006, pp. 2439-2441. [cited by applicant]
Douglas et al., Methane clumped isotopes: Progress and potential for a new isotopic tracer: Organic Geochemistry, v. 113, 2017, p. 262-282. [cited by applicant]
Faber et al., Gaseous hydrocarbons of unknown origin found while drilling: Organic Geochemistry, v. 13, 1988, p. 875-879. [cited by applicant]
Herbinet et al., Thermal decomposition of n-dodecane: Experiments and kinetic modeling: Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, v. 78, 2007, p. 419-429. [cited by applicant]
Johns et al., Combined steam reforming of methane and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis for the formation of hydrocarbons: A proof of concept study: Catalysis Letters, v. 90, 2003, p. 187-194. [cited by applicant]
Kennedy et al., Frictional melting of sedimentary rock during high-speed diamond drilling: an analytical SEM and TEM investigation: Tectonophysics, v. 204, 1992, p. 323-337. [cited by applicant]
Prinzhofer et al., New geochemical characterization of natural gas and its use in oil and gas evaluation, in M.R. Mello, and B.J. Katz, eds., Petroleum Systems of South Atlantic Margins: AAPG Memoir, v. 73, p. 107-119. [cited by applicant]
Ringer et al., Real-time motor and turbine performance monitoring and optimization: IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, San Diego, CA, USA, Mar. 6-8, 2012, IADC/SPE 151451, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wenger et al., Drill-bit metamorphism: Recognition and impact on show evaluation: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 125218-MS, Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana,… [cited by applicant]
Xing et al., Kinetics and Product Distributions for Thermal Cracking of a Kerosene-Based Aviation Fuel: Energy Fuels, v. 23, 2009, p. 4021-4024. [cited by applicant]
Qubaisi et al., Using Drill Bit Metamorphism to Aid in Formation Evaluation of Tight Gas Reservoirs, IPTC-20353-MS, International Petroleum Technology Conference, Jan. 13, 2020, pp. 1-9 pp. 4-5. [cited by applicant]
Key role of regearing mud gas logging for natural hydrogen exploration, Abstract Id: 1315 for SPWLA 63rd Annual Logging Symposium, Nov. 7, 2021, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Han et al., On-line multi-component analysis of gases for mud logging industry using data driven Raman spectroscopy. Fuel, 207, 2017, 146-153. [cited by applicant]
Strapoc et al., Controlled drill bit metamorphism (DBM) using indoor rig floor experiments. Virtual poster presented at IMOG, Sep. 12-17, 2021, Montpelier, France, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., A review of cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy as a gas sensing method. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews, 55(5), 393-417. [cited by applicant]