IP Library Granted Patent US 6,904,365
Granted Patent B2
US 6,904,365 · App. 10/605,526 · Granted Jun 7, 2005

Methods and systems for determining formation properties and in-situ stresses

Assignee: Schlumberger Technology Corporation
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,904,365
App. No.
10/605,526
Granted
Jun 7, 2005
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for determining a formation property related to formation strength and stresses are disclosed. A method for determining a formation strength includes obtaining radial formation property measurements at different wellbore pressures; generating a radial stress profile based on a formation model; generating a radial stress function from the radial stress profile; and comparing the radial formation property measurements with the radial stress function to determine the formation strength. A method for determining a formation stress profile includes deriving formation parameters from a formation radial profiling; obtaining formation log data that comprise formation density data; estimating formation stresses from the formation log data; and deriving a radial stress profile based on a formation model, the derived formation parameters, and the estimated formation stresses.

Claims (61)

1. A method for determining a property of a formation, comprising:

obtaining radial formation property measurements at different wellbore pressures;

generating a radial stress profile based on a formation model;

generating a radial stress function from the radial stress profile; and

comparing the radial formation property measurements with the radial stress function to determine a formation strength.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the radial formation property measurements comprise acoustic measurements of one selected from shear slowness, compressional slowness, Stoneley slowness, and a combination thereof.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the comparing comprises converting the acoustic measurements into a modulus function selected from shear modulus function, Young's modulus function, bulk modulus function, Poisson's ratio function, and Lame's constant lambda function.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the different wellbore pressures are obtained by a method selected from changing a pump rate, turning a pump on and off, changing a weight of a drilling fluid, changing a valve setting, allowing ingress of formation fluids, and a combination thereof.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the formation model is one selected from a linear elastic model, a non-linear elastic model, an elasto-plastic model, a plastic model, and an explicit constitutive model.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the generating the radial stress profile comprises estimating far-field formation stresses and a wellbore radial stress, the far-field formation stresses comprising a vertical stress, a maximum horizontal stress, and a minimum horizontal stress.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the vertical stress is estimated from a formation density measurement and the minimum horizontal stress is estimated from a pressure observed when an induced vertical fracture closes.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein the estimating the radial wellbore stress is based on one selected from a weight of a drilling fluid, a wellbore pressure, an equivalent circulating density, and a combination thereof.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the radial stress function is one selected from a shear stress function or a delta shear stress function.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the delta shear stress function is according to: Δss=½(σ 1 −σ 3 )−½(σ v −σ h ), wherein Δss is the delta shear stress function, σ v is a far-field vertical stress, σ h is a minimum horizontal far-field stress, σ 1 is a maximum stress at a given distance from a wellbore, and σ 1 is a minimum stresses at the given distance from the wellbore.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the formation strength is one selected from a formation yield strength, a formation failure strength, and a combination thereof.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the comparing uses a comparison plot of shear slowness versus a delta shear stress function.

13. A method for determining a property of a formation, comprising:

deriving formation parameters from a formation radial profiling;

obtaining formation log data that comprise formation density data;

estimating formation stresses from the formation log data; and

deriving a radial stress profile based on a formation model, the derived formation parameters, and the estimated formation stresses.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the formation radial profiling uses acoustic measurements acquired with a sonic tool equipped with a dipole source.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the acoustic measurements comprise shear slowness measurements as a function of a distance away from a wellbore.

16. The method of claim 13 , wherein the formation parameters comprise ones selected from a formation strength, a location of formation yield, a location of mode transition, and combinations thereof.

17. The method of claim 13 , wherein the estimating the formation stresses comprises estimating a far-field vertical stress from the formation density data, estimating a far-field minimum horizontal stress from a pressure observed when an induced vertical fracture closes, and estimating a radial wellbore stress based on one selected from a wellbore pressure, a weight of a drilling fluid, an equivalent circulating density, and a combination thereof.

18. A method for monitoring formation stability, comprising:

obtaining formation property measurements at at least two different wellbore pressures; and

deriving a rate of change of the formation property measurements as a function of wellbore pressure to monitor the formation stability.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the formation property measurements comprise acoustic measurements.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the acoustic measurements comprise one selected from compressional slowness measurements, shear slowness measurements, and Stoneley slowness measurements.

21. The method of claim 18 , wherein the different wellbore pressures are achieved by one selected from changing a pump rate, turning a pump on and off, changing a weight of a drilling fluid, changing a valve setting, allowing ingress of formation fluids, and a combination thereof.

22. A system for determining a property of a formation, comprising:

a computer system having a memory for storing a program including instructions for:

obtaining radial formation property measurements at different wellbore pressures;

generating a radial stress profile based on a formation model;

generating a radial stress function from the radial stress profile; and

comparing the radial formation property measurements with the radial stress function to determine a formation strength.

23. The system of claim 22 , wherein the radial formation property measurements comprise acoustic measurements of one selected from shear slowness, compressional slowness, Stoneley slowness, and a combination thereof.

24. The system of claim 23 , wherein the comparing comprises converting the acoustic measurements into a modulus function selected from shear modulus function, Young's modulus function, bulk modulus function, Poisson's ratio function, and Lame's constant lambda function.

25. The system of claim 22 , wherein the different wellbore pressures are obtained by a method selected from changing a pump rate, turning a pump on and off, changing a weight of a drilling fluid, and a combination thereof.

26. The system of claim 22 , wherein the formation model is one selected from a linear elastic model, a non-linear elastic model, an elasto-plastic model, a plastic model, and an explicit constitutive model.

27. The system of claim 22 , wherein the generating the radial stress profile comprises estimating far-field formation stresses and a wellbore radial stress, the far-field formation stresses comprising a vertical stress, a maximum horizontal stress, and a minimum horizontal stress.

28. The system of claim 27 , wherein the vertical stress is estimated a from formation density measurement, the minimum horizontal stress is estimated from a pressure observed when an induced vertical fracture closes, and the radial wellbore stress is estimated from one selected from a weight of a drilling fluid, a wellbore pressure, an equivalent circulating density, and a combination thereof.

29. The system of claim 22 , wherein the radial stress function is one selected from a shear stress function and a delta shear stress function.

30. The system of claim 29 , wherein the delta shear stress function is according to: Δss=½(σ 1 −σ 3 )−½(σ v −σ h ), wherein Δss is the delta shear stress function, σ v is a far-field vertical stress, σ h is a minimum horizontal far-field stress, σ 1 is a maximum stress at a given distance from a wellbore, and σ 1 is a minimum stresses at the given distance from the wellbore.

31. The system of claim 22 , wherein the formation strength is one selected from a formation yield strength, a formation failure strength, and a combination thereof.

32. A system for determining a property of a formation, comprising:

a computer system having a memory for storing a program including instructions for:

deriving formation parameters from a formation radial profiling;

obtaining formation log data that comprise formation density data;

estimating formation stresses from the formation log data; and

deriving a radial stress profile based on a formation model, the derived formation parameters, and the estimated formation stresses.

33. The system of claim 32 , wherein the formation radial profiling uses acoustic measurements acquired with a sonic tool equipped with a dipole source.

34. The system of claim 33 , wherein the acoustic measurements comprise shear slowness measurements as a function of a distance away from a wellbore.

35. The system of claim 32 , wherein the formation parameters comprise one selected from a formation strength, a location of formation yield, a location of mode transition, and a combination thereof.

36. The system of claim 32 , wherein the estimating the formation stresses comprises estimating a far-field vertical stress from the formation density data, estimating a far-field minimum horizontal stress from a pressure required to fracture the formation, and estimating a radial wellbore stress based on one selected from a wellbore pressure, a weight of a drilling fluid, an equivalent circulating density, and a combination thereof.

37. A method for assessing a formation property, comprising:

obtaining a series of formation property measurements at different wellbore pressures; and

analyzing a rate of change of the series of formation property measurements as a function of wellbore pressures to derive the formation property.

38. The method of claim 37 , wherein the formation property measurements comprise one selected from acoustic measurements, resistivity measurements, spontaneous potential measurements, and a combination thereof.

39. The method of claim 37 , wherein the different wellbore pressures are achieved by one selected from changing pump rates, turning a pump on and off, changing a weight of a drilling fluid, changing a valve setting, allowing ingress of formation fluids, and a combination thereof.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 6, 2003
From: BRATTON, TOM R.; SINHA, BIKASH KUMAR; PLONA, THOMAS J.; JEFFRYES, BENJAMIN P.
To: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 014031/0077 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 6045245600 · Mar 6, 2003
Related Publication 20040176911A1 · Sep 9, 2004