IP Library › Granted Patent US 7,011,155
Granted Patent B2
US 7,011,155 · App. 10/423,420 · Granted Mar 14, 2006

Formation testing apparatus and method for optimizing draw down

Assignee: Baker Hughes Incorporated
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,011,155
App. No.
10/423,420
Granted
Mar 14, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and apparatus for of determining a formation parameter of interest. The method includes placing a tool into communication with the formation to test the formation, determining a first formation characteristic during a first test portion, initiating a second test portion, the second test portion having test parameters determined at least in part by the determinations made during the first test portion, determining a second formation characteristic during the second test portion, and determining the formation parameter from one of the first formation characteristic and the second formation characteristic. The apparatus includes a draw down unit and a control system for closed loop control of the draw down unit. A microprocessor in the control system processes signals from a sensor in the draw down unit to determine formation characteristics and to determine test parameters for subsequent test portions.

Claims (21)

1. A method of determining in situ a desired formation parameter of interest comprising:

a) conveying a tool into a well borehole traversing a formation;

b) placing the tool into communication with the formation to test the formation, the test including a first test portion and a second test portion;

c) determining a first characteristic during the first test portion;

d) initiating the second test portion, the second test portion having test parameters determined at least in part by the determinations made during the first test portion;

e) determining a second characteristic during the second test portion; and

f) determining the desired formation parameter from one or more of the first characteristic and the second characteristic.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first test portion includes increasing a test volume in the tool at a first rate for a predetermined time interval.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the first test portion includes a multi-rate draw down.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the multi-rate draw down includes a step-wise draw down.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the first test portion includes drawing the test volume pressure below the formation pressure and controlling the draw rate to create substantial equilibrium between the draw rate and flow rate into the tool.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first test portion includes determining one or more of i) formation mobility; ii) formation pressure; iii) fluid compressibility; and iv) a quality indicator.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second test portion includes increasing a test volume in the tool at a second rate for a predetermined time interval.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the second test portion includes a multi-rate draw down.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the multi-rate draw down includes a step-wise draw down.

10. The method of claim 7 , wherein the second test portion includes drawing the test volume pressure below the formation pressure and controlling the draw rate to create substantial equilibrium between the draw rate and flow rate into the tool.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second test portion includes determining one or more of i) formation mobility; ii) formation pressure; iii) fluid compressibility; and iv) a quality indicator.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first test portion includes increasing a test volume in the tool at a first rate for a predetermined time period, holding the test volume at a constant volume to allow a test volume pressure to stabilize, the test parameters for the second test portion including a second rate for increasing the test volume, the second rate not equaling the first draw rate.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second test portion includes aborting the test, wherein the desired formation parameter is determined based in part on the determined characteristic.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein formation rate analysis is used in determining the first characteristic.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein formation rate analysis is used in determining the second characteristic.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 6, 2003
From: MEISTER, MATTHIAS; LEE, JAEDONG; KRUEGER, SVEN; NIEMEYER, EICK
To: BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 014348/0526 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation In Part 0991062400 · Jul 20, 2001
Continuation In Part 0991020900 · Jul 20, 2001
Related Publication 20040026125A1 · Feb 12, 2004