IP Library Granted Patent US 7,053,266
Granted Patent B2
US 7,053,266 · App. 10/107,581 · Granted May 30, 2006

Chimeric cry1E δendotoxin and methods of controlling insects

Assignee: Council of Scientfic and Industrial Research
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,053,266
App. No.
10/107,581
Granted
May 30, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

A chimeric Cry1E δ endotoxin and methods of using it to treat plants to reduce or control insects.

Claims (23)

1. A chimeric nucleic acid comprising SEQ ID NO:2.

2. The chimeric nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said chimera encodes a chimeric protein of SEQ ID NO:1.

3. The chimeric nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said chimera has a of length 1990 base pairs (bp).

4. The chimeric nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said chimera is a 1.99-kb double stranded DNA.

5. The chimeric nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said chimeric nucleic acid has ATGGCT at its 5′ extreme, as an initiation codon.

6. The chimeric nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said chimeric nucleic acid has TAATGA as a translation termination codon.

7. The chimeric nucleic acid as claimed in claim 1 , wherein said chimera has a T m value ranging between 44 to 55° C.

8. A method of overexpressing an insecticidal chimeric Cry1E protein in a microbe, wherein said method comprises:

(a) cloning SEQ ID NO:2, which encodes the protein, in a vector such that SEQ ID NO:2 is operably linked to a promoter,

(b) transforming a microbe with said vector, and

(c) overexpressing said chimeric Cry1E protein in said microbe.

9. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein said chimera is expressed into a microbe selected from the group consisting of bacteria, algae, and fungi.

10. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the restriction enzymes for said cloning are selected from the group comprising of Hind III, EcoR1, Ncol, Mfe I and BamHI.

11. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the promoter is inducible by isopropylthiogalactoside (IPTG) and wherein the protein is overexpressed by induction by IPTG.

12. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the protein is overexpressed at 15° C. to avoid mis-folding of said protein.

13. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein said vectors are selected from the group consisting of plasmids, viral DNA, and cosmids.

14. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein expression of said protein in the microbe is confirmed by RT-PCR, Western analysis, and ELISA.

15. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein presence of SEQ ID NO:2 in the microbe is confirmed by PCR and Southern analysis.

16. A method of inducing insect tolerance into a plant wherein said method comprises:

incorporating a chimeric gene comprising the nucleic acid of claim 8 operably linked to a plant promoter into a plant, thereby producing a transgenic plant with insect tolerance.

17. The method as claimed in claim 16 , wherein said plant is selected from the group consisting of tobacco, cotton, chickpea, pigeonpea groundnut, cauliflower, cabbage, and capsicum.

18. The method as claimed in claim 16 , wherein restriction enzymes for said cloning are selected from the group consisting of Hind III, EcoRI, Ncol, and BamHI.

19. The method as claimed in claim 16 , wherein the chimeric protein is expressed at a level of 0.5% of the total soluble protein in the plant.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 17, 2002
From: TULI, RAKESH
To: COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH
Reel/Frame 013296/0004 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20030188335A1 · Oct 2, 2003