IP Library › Granted Patent US 7,127,011
Granted Patent B2
US 7,127,011 · App. 10/232,637 · Granted Oct 24, 2006

Procedure for jammer detection

Assignee: Qualcomm Incorporated
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,127,011
App. No.
10/232,637
Granted
Oct 24, 2006
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of and system for detecting whether a peak of a correlation function derived from a received signal is due to a jammer. The peak is within a localized portion of the correlation function which has a total number of peaks. In one embodiment, the total number of peaks is compared to a threshold number of peaks, and the peak is identified as being due to a jammer if the total number of peaks equals or exceeds a threshold number of peaks. In a second embodiment, the peak energy in relation to a noise estimate for the localized portion of the correlation function is compared to a jammer threshold. The peak is identified as being due to a jammer if the peak energy in relation to the noise estimate is less than or equal to the jammer threshold.

Claims (25)

1. A method of detecting whether a peak of a correlation function derived from a received signal is due to a jammer, said peak being within a localized portion of the correlation function having a total number of peaks, comprising:

comparing the total number of peaks with a threshold number of peaks; and

identifying said peak as being due to a jammer if the total number of peaks equals or exceeds the threshold.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the total number of peaks within the localized portion of the correlation function define a plurality of peaks, and the identifying step comprises identifying all of the peaks in said plurality of peaks as being due to a jammer if the total number of peaks equals or exceeds the threshold.

3. A method of detecting whether a peak of a correlation function derived from a received signal is due to a jammer, the peak being within a localized portion of the correlation function having a noise estimate, and the peak having a peak energy, comprising;

comparing the peak energy in relation to the noise estimate to a jammer threshold; and

identifying the peak as being due to a jammer if the peak energy in relation to the noise estimate is less than or equal to the jammer threshold.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the noise estimate is a mean measured noise estimate.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the identifying step comprises identifying the peak as being due to a jammer if the peak energy is less than or equal to the product of the jammer threshold and the mean measured noise estimate.

6. The method of claim 4 wherein the localized portion of the correlation function comprises a plurality of samples including peak and non-peak samples, and the mean measured noise estimate is derived by averaging the non-peak samples.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein each peak in the localized portion is characterized by a peak sample and two adjacent samples, and the non-peak samples comprise all the samples in the plurality of samples except for the peak and adjacent samples.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the localized portion of the correlation function comprises a plurality of samples including peak and non-peak samples, and the identifying step comprises identifying said peak as being due to a jammer if the number of non-peak samples is less than or equal to a threshold number of samples.

9. A memory tangibly embodying the method of claim 1 .

10. A memory tangibly embodying the method of claim 3 .

11. The method of claim 1 wherein the localized portion of the correlation function is a Doppler segment.

12. The method of claim 3 wherein the localized portion of the correlation function is a Doppler segment.

13. The method of claim 8 wherein the identifying step comprises identifying all of the peaks within the localized portion of the correlation function as being due to a jammer if the number of non-peak samples is less than or equal to the threshold number of samples.

14. A system for detecting whether a peak of a correlation function derived from a received signal is due to a jammer comprising a processor and the memory of claim 9 , wherein the processor is configured to access and execute the software instructions tangibly embodied by the memory.

15. A system for detecting whether a peak of a correlation function derived from a received signal is due to a jammer comprising a processor and the memory of claim 10 , wherein the processor is configured to access and execute the software instructions tangibly embodied by the memory.

16. A method of detecting whether a peak of a correlation function derived from a received signal is due to a jammer, said peak being within a localized portion of the correlation function having a total number of peaks, comprising:

a step for comparing the total number of peaks with a threshold number of peaks; and

a step for identifying said peak as being due to a jammer if the total number of peaks equals or exceeds the threshold.

17. A method of detecting whether a peak of a correlation function derived from a received signal is due to a jammer, the peak being within a localized portion of the correlation function having a noise estimate, and the peak having a peak energy, comprising:

a step for comparing the peak energy in relation to the noise estimate to a jammer threshold; and

a step for identifying the peak as being due to a jammer if the peak energy in relation to the noise estimate is less than or equal to the jammer threshold.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 29, 2002
From: ROWITCH, DOUGLAS N.
To: QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, A CORP. OF DELAWARE
Reel/Frame 013262/0830 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20040042568A1 · Mar 4, 2004