IP Library › Granted Patent US 7,213,023
Granted Patent B2
US 7,213,023 · App. 09/855,220 · Granted May 1, 2007

Incremental clustering classifier and predictor

Assignee: University of North Carolina at Charlotte
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,213,023
App. No.
09/855,220
Granted
May 1, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention provides mathematical model-based incremental clustering methods for classifying sets of data and predicting new data values, based upon the concepts of similarity and cohesion. In order to increase processing efficiency, these methods employ weighted attribute relevance in building unbiased classification trees and sum pairing to reduce the number of nodes visited when performing classification or prediction operations. In order to increase prediction accuracy, these methods employ weighted voting over each value of target attributes to calculate a prediction profile. The present invention also allows an operator to determine the importance of attributes and reconstitute classification trees without those attributes deemed unimportant to further increase classification structure node processing efficiency.

Claims (23)

1. A computer-implemented method of classifying an instance comprising the steps of:

receiving an instance to be classified, the instance to be classified comprising at least one attribute and corresponding relevance value;

determining a best host for the instance to be classified;

inserting the instance to be classified into a location relative to at least one child of the best host within a classification structure, the classification structure comprising at least one node, and the node comprising at least one attribute and corresponding relevance value; and

displaying the classification structure;

determining at least one distinguishing feature of the instance to be classified; and

visually contrasting the instance to be classified vice nodes within the classification structure, based upon the value of the at least one distinguishing feature.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the best host for the instance to be classified comprises:

processing class concept nodes of the classification structure, comprising the steps of:

receiving a class concept node of the classification structure;

calculating a delta cohesiveness measurement (ΔCM) value between the instance to be classified and the class concept node; and

storing the largest ΔCM value and the corresponding class concept node at each level of the classification structure;

determining the largest ΔCM value over all levels of the classification structure; and

storing the class concept node corresponding to the largest ΔCM value over all levels of the classification structure.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the best host for the instance to be classified is performed recursively.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein inserting the instance to be classified into a location relative to at least one child of the best host within a classification structure comprises:

selecting at least one best host child node;

calculating a ΔCM value between the instance to be classified and the at least one best host child;

storing the ΔCM value associated with each at least one best host child;

storing a count of the total number of the at least one best host child;

storing a count of the total number of stored ΔCM values associated with each at least one best host child that are greater than 0.0; and

adding the instance to be classified to the classification structure as a sibling or child of the at least one best host child, based upon the ΔCM value associated with each at least one best host child, the count of the total number of the at least one best host child, and the count of the total number of stored ΔCM values associated with each at least one best host child that are greater than 0.0.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one distinguishing feature comprises at least one of an attribute value, a context value and a relationship value.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 27, 2004
From: MINDVALVE, INC.
To: UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE, THE
Reel/Frame 015754/0864 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2001
From: HADZIKADIC, MIRSAD; BOHREN, BENJAMIN F.; EICHELBERGER, CHRISTOPHER N.
To: NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE, UNIVERSITY OF
Reel/Frame 012328/0582 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 6024003700 · Oct 16, 2000
Related Publication 20020059202A1 · May 16, 2002