IP Library Granted Patent US 7,320,346
Granted Patent B2
US 7,320,346 · App. 11/743,055 · Granted Jan 22, 2008

Method of proof testing glass

Assignee: Zogenix, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,320,346
App. No.
11/743,055
Granted
Jan 22, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of proof testing glass containers is disclosed. The method involves applying pressure to a sealed container in two discrete stages as shown in FIG. 1 . In the first stage, the pressure is increased to a peak over at a first rate. In the second stage, the pressure is reduced to zero at a much greater rate.

Claims (34)

1. A method of testing the strength of a glass container, comprising:

pressurizing the container, the container failing the test if it breaks;

wherein the container is pressurized to be subjected to a pressure profile which in a first stage increases from a starting pressure to a peak pressure at a first average rate of pressure increase; and

wherein in a second stage decreases from the peak pressure to the starting pressure at a second average rate of pressure decrease which is greater than the first average rate of pressure increase.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the second stage of the pressure profile involves reducing the pressure substantially instantaneously to the starting pressure; and

wherein the starting pressure is atmospheric pressure.

3. A method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the first stage of the pressure profile involved ramping the pressure substantially linearly to the peak pressure.

4. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein pressurizing the container comprises filling the container with water and pressurizing the liquid; and

wherein the pressure is applied by first sealing the container and applying the pressure hydrostatically using the water; and

wherein the container seal is applied using an o-ring which seals under hydrostatic pressure.

5. A method as claimed in claim 4 , wherein the pressure is released in the second stage by opening a hydraulic valve.

6. A method as claimed in claim 4 , wherein the pressure is applied using a mechanical servo driven drive and the pressure is released in the second stage by a pneumatic cylinder.

7. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the container is subjected to a plurality of tests.

8. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the first stage of the pressure profile has a duration of 30-250 ms; and

wherein the second stage of the pressure profile has a duration of 1-10 ms.

9. A method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the first stage of the pressure profile has a duration of 40-70 ms; and

wherein the second stage of the pressure profile has a duration of 0-2 ms.

10. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the second stage immediately follows the first stage.

11. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the peak pressure is in the range 300-900 Bar.

12. A method as claimed in claim 11 , wherein the peak pressure is in the range 300-700 Bar.

13. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 7 and 10 , wherein the pressure to which the container is controlled using feedback from a pressure sensor.

14. A method as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the container comprises a glass capsule for a needle-less injector.

15. A method of testing the strength of a glass container, comprising:

pressurizing the container, the container failing the test if it breaks;

wherein the container is pressurized and subjected to a pressure profile which in a first stage increases from a starting pressure to a peak pressure at a first average rate of pressure increase over a first period of time of 30-250 ms; and

wherein in a second stage which immediately follows the first stage and decreases from the peak pressure to the starting pressure at a second average rate of pressure decrease over a second period of time of 0-10 ms.

16. A method as claimed in claim 15 , wherein the second period of time is substantially instantaneous; and

wherein the starting pressure is atmospheric pressure.

17. A method as claimed in claim 16 , wherein the first stage of the pressure profile involved ramping the pressure substantially linearly to the peak pressure.

18. A method as claimed in claim 15 , wherein the first period of time has a duration of 40-70 ms.

19. A method as claimed in claim 18 , wherein the second period of time has a duration of 0-2 ms.

20. A method as claimed in claim 19 , wherein the container comprises a glass capsule for a needle-less injector.

21. A method as claimed in claim 15 , wherein the peak pressure is in the range 300-900 Bar.

22. A method as claimed in claim 15 , wherein the peak pressure is in the range 300-700 Bar.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 8, 2012
From: OXFORD FINANCE LLC, SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO OXFORD FINANCE CORPORATION
To: ZOGENIX, INC.
Reel/Frame 028752/0486 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 8, 2011
From: ZOGENIX, INC.
To: OXFORD FINANCE LLC
Reel/Frame 026565/0778 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2007
From: ARADIGM CORPORATION
To: ZOGENIX, INC.
Reel/Frame 019770/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 24, 2007
From: KING, TOBY; BRIDGES, PAUL STUART; SHERGOLD, OLIVER
To: ARADIGM CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 019742/0082 →
Priority Claims (1)
GB 0229447.8 · Dec 18, 2002 · national
Continuity (2)
Continuation 1053996400
Related Publication 20070193338A1 · Aug 23, 2007