IP Library Granted Patent US 7,360,892
Granted Patent B2
US 7,360,892 · App. 11/352,860 · Granted Apr 22, 2008

Method and apparatus for selecting contact lens for reshaping altered corneas due to post refractive surgery, previous Ortho-K or Keratoconus

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,360,892
App. No.
11/352,860
Granted
Apr 22, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

A kit for determining a hypothetical cornea for use with post-LASIK and post myopia Ortho-K amendment. The kit has a reference table for determining conformation data by using at least one of following data: pre-treatment KM readings, post-treatment KM readings, power reduced from before- to after-treatment, and post-treatment cornea optical zone. The kit further comprises a plurality of conformed lenses based on the conformation data in predetermined increments from the reference table. The pre-treatment KM readings comprise pre-operative or pre-ortho-K readings. The post-treatment KM readings comprise post-operative or post ortho-K readings. The post-treatment cornea optical zone comprises post-operative or post-ortho-K cornea optical zone. Also, a method of determining a hypothetical cornea for use with post-LASIK and post myopia Ortho-K amendment is disclosed. The method has inputting pre-treatment KM readings, inputting post-treatment KM readings, inputting power reduced from before- to after treatment, inputting post-treatment cornea optical zone, calculating conformation data, which is adapted to be used to generate specification for conformed lenses. Another kit for determining a hypothetical cornea for use with Keratoconus and post-hyperopia Ortho-K amendment can be constructed using at least one of following data: pre-altered KM readings, post-altered KM readings, pre-altered refraction error, and post altered specifications. The kit further comprises a plurality of conformed lenses based on the conformation data in predetermined increments from the reference table. The pre-altered KM readings comprise pre-keratoconus or pre-hyperopia ortho-K readings. The pre-altered refraction errors comprise refraction errors from a set of normal corneas. The post-altered specifications comprise cone widths of Keratoconus or steepened cornea zone of hyperopic Ortho-K and also magnitude of off centering of the cone apex.

Claims (65)

1. A method of manufacturing a set of conformed lenses by using a computer to determine conformation data for use with post-LASIK and post myopia Ortho-K amendment, comprising:

determining conformation data by inputting data representative of at least one of the following data into said computer, said computer being adapted to calculate said conformation data:

pre-treatment KM readings;

post-treatment KM readings;

power reduced from before- to after-treatment;

post-treatment cornea optical zone, and

based on said conformation data, generating lens manufacturing specification by said computer based on predetermined processes;

transmitting said lens manufacturing specification into a predetermined lens manufacturing machine,

manufacturing by said manufacturing machine a set of conformed lenses.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said manufacturing comprises manufacturing a plurality of conformed lenses in predetermined increments.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

said pre-treatment KM readings comprise pre-operative or pre-ortho-K readings;

said post-treatment KM readings comprise post-operative or post ortho-K readings;

post-treatment cornea optical zone comprises post-operative or post-ortho-K cornea optical zone.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

said power reduced from before- to after-treatment comprises a difference of pre-operative or pre-ortho-K refractive error to post-operative or post ortho-K refractive error.

5. A method of manufacturing a set of conformed lenses by using a computer to generate data, comprising:

determining conformation data by inputting data representative of at least one of following data into said computer, said computer being adapted to calculate said conformation data based on predetermined processes:

pre-altered KM readings;

post-altered KM readings;

at least one of Pre-altered refraction error or its power code; post-altered specifications, at least one of cone of Keratoconus and steepened cornea area of hyperopic Ortho-K,

based on said conformation data, generating lens manufacturing specification by said computer based on predetermined processes;

transmitting said lens manufacturing specification into a predetermined lens manufacturing machine,

manufacturing by said manufacturing machine a set of conformed lenses by using said lens manufacturing specification.

6. A method of claim 5 , further comprises manufacturing a plurality of conformed lenses based on the conformation data in predetermined increments.

7. A method of claim 5 , wherein:

said pre-altered cornea curvature readings comprise cornea readings from a set of normal corneas;

said post-altered cornea curvature readings comprise cornea readings of at least one of cone apex of Keratoconus and post hyperopic Ortho-K;

said pre-altered refraction errors or its power code comprise refraction errors determined by over refracted power from a set of normal corneas;

said post-altered specifications comprise at least one of cone widths of Keratoconus and steepened cornea zone of hyperopic Ortho-K;

said post-altered specifications also comprise magnitude of off centering of the cone apex.

8. A method of manufacturing a set of conformed lenses by using a computer to determine specification, comprising:

Inputting data representative of pre-treatment KM readings into said computer;

Inputting data representative of post-treatment KM readings into said computer;

Inputting data representative of power reduced from before- to after treatment into said computer;

Inputting data representative of post-treatment cornea optical zone into said computer;

Calculating conformation data by said computer based on at least one of the above-inputted data, said computer being adapted to generate specification for conformed lenses,

extracting said specification from said computer,

manufacturing a set of conformed lenses based on said specification for conformed lenses.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein:

said pre-treatment KM readings comprise pre-operative or pre-ortho-K readings;

said post-treatment KM readings comprise post-operative or post ortho-K readings;

post-treatment cornea optical zone comprises post-operative or post-ortho-K cornea optical zone.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein:

said power reduced from before- to after-treatment comprises a difference of pre-operative or pre-ortho-K refractive error to post-operative or post ortho-K refractive error.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein said inputting comprises inputting at least one of numerical data and a selected code corresponding to predetermined data.

12. A method of manufacturing a set of conformed lenses by using a computer to generate conformation data, comprising:

Inputting pre-altered KM readings into a computer;

Inputting post-altered KM readings into said computer;

Inputting pre-altered refraction errors or its power code into said computer;

Inputting post-altered specifications, at lease one of cone of Keratoconus and steepened cornea area of hyperopic Ortho-K into said computer;

Calculating conformation data based on predetermined processes by said computer;

Using said conformation data to generate specification for manufacturing conformed lenses,

Extracting said specification from said computer into a predetermined data format,

Manufacturing a set of conformed lenses by using said predetermined data format.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein:

said inputting comprises inputting at least one of numerical data and a selected code representative of said data.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein:

said pre-altered cornea curvature readings comprise cornea readings from a set of normal corneas;

said post-altered cornea curvature readings comprise cornea readings of at least one of cone apex of Keratoconus and post hyperopic Ortho-K;

said pre-altered refraction errors or its power code comprise refraction errors determined by over refracted power from a set of normal corneas;

Said post-altered specifications comprise at least one of cone widths of Keratoconus and steepened cornea zone of hyperopic Ortho-K;

Said post-altered specifications also comprise magnitude of off centering of the cone apex.

15. The method of claim 8 , wherein inputting is performed by a client processor, calculating is performed by a server processor connected to the client processor through a global data communication network.

16. The method of claim 12 , wherein inputting is performed by a client processor, calculating is performed by a server processor connected to the client processor through a global data communication network.

Continuity (3)
Continuation 1089569200 · Jul 20, 2004
Continuation PCTUS032462400 · Aug 6, 2003
Related Publication 20060132707A1 · Jun 22, 2006