IP Library › Granted Patent US 7,492,943
Granted Patent B2
US 7,492,943 · App. 11/075,982 · Granted Feb 17, 2009

Open set recognition using transduction

Assignee: George Mason Intellectual Properties, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,492,943
App. No.
11/075,982
Granted
Feb 17, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

An open set recognition system utilizing transductive inference including capture device(s), a basis, quality checker(s), feature extractor(s), a gallery, a rejection threshold, a storage mechanism, and a recognition stage. The basis encodes sample(s) and is derived using training samples. The feature extractor(s) generates signature(s) from sample(s) using the basis. The rejection threshold is created using a rejection threshold learning mechanism that calculates the rejection threshold using sample(s) by: swapping a sample identifier with other sample identifier(s); computing a credibility value for the swapped sample identifiers; deriving a peak-to-side ratio distribution using the credibility values; and determining the rejection threshold using the peak-to-side ratio distribution. The open set recognition stage authenticates or reject as unknown the identity of unknown sample(s) using derived credibility values, derived peak-to-side ratios for the unknown sample and the rejection threshold.

Claims (56)

1. A pattern recognition system comprising:

a) at least one capture device configured to acquire at least one sample, each of said at least one sample associated with a sample identifier;

b) a basis configured to encode at least one of said at least one sample, said basis derived using a multitude of representative training samples;

c) at least one feature extractor configured to generate at least one signature from at least one of said at least one sample using said basis;

d) a gallery, said gallery including at least one gallery sample, each of said at least one gallery sample being one of said at least one signature;

e) a rejection threshold, said rejection threshold created using a rejection threshold learning mechanism, said rejection threshold learning mechanism configured to calculate said rejection threshold using at least one of said at least one sample by:

i) swapping one of said sample identifier with other possible said sample identifier;

ii) computing a credibility value (p) for each of the swapped sample identifiers;

iii) deriving a peak-to-side ratio (PSR) distribution using a multitude of said credibility value; and

iv) determining said rejection threshold using said peak-to-side ratio distribution;

f) a storage mechanism configured to store at least one of said at least one gallery sample; and

g) an open set recognition stage configured to authenticate or reject as unknown the identity of at least one unknown sample, by:

i) deriving a set of credibility values by iteratively assign each of the gallery identifiers to the unknown sample and calculating a credibility value;

ii) deriving a peak-to-side ratio for said unknown sample using said set of credibility values;

iii) comparing said peak-to-side ratio for said unknown sample to said rejection threshold;

iv) rejecting said unknown sample as unknown if said peak-to-side ratio is less than or equal to said rejection threshold; and

v) finding the closest of said at least one gallery sample if said peak-to-side ratio is greater than said rejection threshold.

2. A system according to claim 1 , wherein said step of finding the closest of said at least one gallery sample if said peak-to-side ratio is greater than said rejection threshold includes calculating a credibility value for the closest of said at least one gallery sample.

3. A system according to claim 1 , wherein said step of finding the closest of said at least one gallery sample if said peak-to-side ratio is greater than said rejection threshold includes calculating a confidence value for the closest of said at least one gallery sample.

4. A system according to claim 1 , further including an error analysis stage configured to identify difficult to recognize samples.

5. A system according to claim 4 , wherein said difficult to recognize samples are processed using data fusion techniques.

6. A system according to claim 4 , wherein said difficult to recognize samples are processed using multiple representations.

7. A system according to claim 1 , wherein at least one of said at least one sample is a biometric sample.

8. A system according to claim 1 , wherein said basis is used to derive standard PCA and/or Fisherfaces coefficients.

9. A system according to claim 1 , wherein said basis is pre-derived using at least some of said multitude of representative training samples.

10. A system according to claim 1 , wherein at least one of said at least one capture device is one of the following:

a) a still image camera;

b) a video camera;

c) a micro array; and

d) a data acquisition instrument.

11. A system according to claim 1 , further including at least one quality checker configured to evaluate quality of at least one of said at least one sample using a calculated signal to noise ratio.

12. A system according to claim 1 , wherein at least one of said at least one sample is an image of a face.

13. A system according to claim 1 , wherein said at least one sample is a multitude of samples and said one gallery sample is a multitude of gallery samples.

14. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the pattern recognition system is used for outlier detection when engaged in clustering.

15. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the pattern recognition system is used for novelty detection.

16. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the pattern recognition system is used for change detection.

17. A pattern recognition method comprising using a system to perform the steps of:

a) acquiring at least one sample acquired from at least one capture device, each of said at least one sample associated with a sample identifier;

b) encoding at least one of said at least one sample using a basis, said basis derived using a multitude of representative training samples;

c)generating at least one signature from at least one of said at least one sample using said basis;

d) storing at least one of said at least one signature in a gallery, each of said at least one signature being a gallery sample;

e) calculating a rejection threshold using at least one of said at least one sample by:

i) swapping one of said sample identifier with other possible said sample identifier;

ii) computing a credibility value (p) for each of the swapped sample identifiers;

iii) deriving a peak-to-side ratio (PSR) distribution using a multitude of said credibility value; and

iv) determining said rejection threshold using said peak-to-side ratio distribution; and

f) authenticating or rejecting as unknown the identity of at least one unknown sample, by:

i) deriving a set of credibility values by iteratively assign each of the gallery identifiers to the unknown sample and calculating a credibility value;

ii) deriving a peak-to-side ratio for said unknown sample using said set of credibility values;

iii) comparing said peak-to-side ratio for said unknown sample to said rejection threshold;

iv) rejecting said unknown sample as unknown if said peak-to-side ratio is less than or equal to said rejection threshold; and

v) finding the closest of said at least one gallery sample if said peak-to-side ratio is greater than said rejection threshold.

18. A method according to claim 17 , wherein said step of finding the closest of said at least one gallery sample if said peak-to-side ratio is greater than said rejection threshold includes calculating a credibility value for the closest of said at least one gallery sample.

19. A method according to claim 17 , wherein said step of finding the closest of said at least one gallery sample if said peak-to-side ratio is greater than said rejection threshold includes calculating a confidence value for the closest of said at least one gallery sample.

20. A method according to claim 17 , further including the step of selecting features for enhanced pattern recognition using strangeness and a p-value function where the stranger the feature values are the better the discrimination between patterns.

21. A method according to claim 17 , wherein at least one of said at least one sample is a biometric sample.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 7, 2009
From: WECHSLER, HARRY; LI, FAYIN
To: GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 022067/0764 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 7, 2009
From: GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY
To: GEORGE MASON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 022067/0816 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 6062306400 · Oct 29, 2004
Related Publication 20060093208A1 · May 4, 2006