IP Library › Granted Patent US 7,865,131
Granted Patent B2
US 7,865,131 · App. 11/601,768 · Granted Jan 4, 2011

Methods for improving certainty of test-taker performance determinations for assessments with open-ended items

Assignee: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,865,131
App. No.
11/601,768
Granted
Jan 4, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

The current invention is designed to improve the certainty of test-taker classifications in testing programs utilizing open-ended items. The current invention discloses methods to improve certainty in estimates of test-taker performance for all test-takers while using a minimum of scoring resources. The invention selectively allocates resources to scoring by ceasing to allocate scoring resources to test-takers whose performance has been determined with sufficient certainty, and by having an additional reader or readers score responses from test-takers whose scores are close to cutoff levels. The invention further increases precision of scores for test-takers near a cutoff by selectively allocating more reliable and accurate readers to score responses most likely to influence a test-taker's performance classification. Other scoring resources are also shown.

Claims (52)

1. A method of allocating resources in conjunction with scoring a test-taker's response to an open-ended item of an assessment including a plurality of items that contribute to a specific performance level classification, wherein the method is implemented using a computer system programmed to perform steps comprising:

a. collecting test-taker information and adding the collected information to a database of the computer system;

b. estimating a test-taker performance classification for a portion of the assessment comprising the plurality of items based on the collected test-taker information, wherein estimating the performance classification comprises classifying the test-taker into one of two or more performance levels;

c. estimating the certainty of the estimated test-taker performance classification; and

d. allocating a scoring resource to score the test-taker's response to the open-ended item as a function of the estimated certainty that the test-taker falls within one performance level and not a different performance level.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the test-taker information includes at least one score on at least one multiple choice item of the plurality of items.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the test-taker information includes at least one score on at least one additional open-ended item of the plurality of items.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the test-taker information includes at least one score on the open ended item.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the test-taker information includes at least one score from at least one other assessment.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the test-taker information includes at least one teacher rating.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the estimated performance classification corresponds to an estimated score on the plurality of items.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the estimated performance classification corresponds to an estimated performance level on the plurality of items.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the estimated performance classification corresponds to an estimated score on the open-ended item.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

a. determining reader accuracy based on estimated test taker performance and a score assigned by a reader; and

b. allocating scoring resources based on that determination.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising assigning a first score to the open ended item.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising assigning, by the scoring resource, an additional score to the open ended item.

13. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining that a stopping criteria has been reached.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the stopping criteria corresponds to applying all available scoring resources.

15. The method of claim 13 , wherein the stopping criteria corresponds to applying all allocated scoring resources.

16. The method of claim 13 , wherein the stopping criteria corresponds to a lack of additional scoring resources that would substantially improve a certainty of the estimated test-taker performance classification.

17. The method of claim 13 , wherein the stopping criteria corresponds to a determination that the estimated test-taker performance classification is determined with sufficient certainty.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the estimate of the precision corresponds to reader characteristics of at least one of an individual reader and a set of readers.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the reader characteristics include reader accuracy.

20. The method of claim 18 , wherein the reader characteristics include a distribution of item scores assigned by a reader.

21. The method of claim 18 , wherein the reader characteristics include reader agreement statistics.

22. The method of claim 1 , wherein step d. is initially performed before two readers have scored the test-taker's response to the open-ended item.

23. The method of claim 1 , wherein step d. is initially performed after only a single reader has scored the test-taker's response to the open-ended question.

24. The method of claim 23 , wherein no further scoring resources are allocated to score the test-taker's response to the open-ended question if the test-taker's performance classification is determined to be estimated with sufficient certainty after only the single reader has scored the test-taker's response to the open-ended question.

25. A method of allocating scoring resources in conjunction with scoring a test-taker's response to an open-ended item of an assessment, wherein the method is implemented using a computer system programmed to perform steps comprising:

(a) collecting test-taker information and adding the collected information to a database of the computer system;

(b) assigning the open-ended item of the assessment to only a first reader to assign a score to the open-ended item of assessment;

(c) storing the score assigned by the first reader to the database as part of the collected information;

(d) estimating a performance classification for the test-taker using collected information including the score of the open-ended item of the assessment assigned by the first reader;

(e) estimating the certainty of the estimated performance classification; and

(f) only if it is determined that the test-taker's estimated performance classification has not been estimated with sufficient certainty, assigning the open-ended question to a second reader.

26. A method of allocating scoring resources in conjunction with determining a test-taker's performance level classification, wherein the method is implemented using a computer system programmed to perform steps comprising:

(a) collecting test-taker information including responses to each of a plurality of open-ended items of the assessment that contribute to a specific performance level classification and adding the collected information to a database of the computer system;

(b) selecting an un-scored open-ended item response of the plurality of open-ended item responses;

(c) assigning the selected open-ended item response to a reader to assign a score to the selected open-ended item response;

(d) storing the reader's score of the selected open-ended item response in the database as part of the collected information;

(e) repeating steps (b) through (d) for each un-scored open-ended item response of the plurality of open-ended item responses;

(f) estimating the test-taker's performance level classification based on the collected test-taker information, wherein the estimating the test-taker's performance level classification comprises classifying the test-taker into one of two or more performance levels;

(g) estimating the certainty of the estimated test-taker performance level classification; and

(h) if the test-taker's performance level classification has been estimated to fall within one performance level and not a different performance level with sufficient certainty, stopping the scoring of the plurality of open-ended item responses; and

(i) if the test-taker's performance level classification has been estimated to fall within one performance level and not a different performance level with insufficient certainty:

(1) choosing a response from the plurality of open-ended item responses;

(2) assigning the chosen open-ended item response to a reader that has not already scored the chosen open-ended item response to assign an additional score to the item;

(3) storing the additional score of the chosen open-ended item response in the database as part of the collected information; and

(4) repeating steps (f) through (i).

27. The method of claim 26 , wherein the choosing step of step (i)(1) comprises choosing one or more item responses deemed likely to achieve sufficient certainty in the estimation of the test-taker's performance level classification, thereby deferring the allocation of additional scoring resources from other item responses.

Assignments (20)
SECURITY INTEREST (NOTES) Recorded Aug 9, 2024
From: ACHIEVE3000, INC.; ACTIVELY LEARN INC.; MCGRAW HILL LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 068522/0031 →
RELEASE OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (FIRST LIEN) Recorded Aug 23, 2021
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS AGENT
To: MCGRAW HILL LLC (AS SUCCESSOR TO MCGRAW-HILL SCHOOL EDUCATION HOLDINGS, LLC)
Reel/Frame 057263/0646 →
RELEASE OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (FIRST LIEN) Recorded Aug 23, 2021
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS AGENT
To: MCGRAW HILL LLC
Reel/Frame 057263/0664 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 3, 2021
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: MCGRAW HILL LLC
Reel/Frame 057070/0283 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 30, 2021
From: MCGRAW HILL LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Reel/Frame 057041/0925 →
ABL SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 30, 2021
From: MCGRAW HILL LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Reel/Frame 057041/0934 →
NOTES SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 30, 2021
From: MCGRAW HILL LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Reel/Frame 057041/0977 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 22, 2021
From: MCGRAW HILL LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 055000/0643 →
CHANGE OF ASSIGNEE ADDRESS Recorded Jan 28, 2020
From: MCGRAW HILL LLC
To: MCGRAW HILL LLC
Reel/Frame 051723/0187 →
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 22, 2020
From: MCGRAW-HILL SCHOOL EDUCATION HOLDINGS, LLC; MCGRAW-HILL SCHOOL EDUCATION LLC
To: MCGRAW HILL LLC
Reel/Frame 051586/0564 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 2, 2020
From: MCGRAW HILL LLC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 051402/0282 →
RELEASE OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 29, 2016
From: BANK OF MONTREAL
To: MCGRAW-HILL SCHOOL EDUCATION HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 039205/0871 →
RELEASE OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 29, 2016
From: BANK OF MONTREAL
To: MCGRAW-HILL SCHOOL EDUCATION HOLDINGS, LLC; CTB/MCGRAW-HILL LLC; GROW.NET, INC.
Reel/Frame 039206/0035 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 29, 2016
From: MCGRAW-HILL SCHOOL EDUCATION HOLDINGS, LLC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Reel/Frame 039205/0841 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 13, 2015
From: DATA RECOGNITION CORPORATION
To: MCGRAW-HILL SCHOOL EDUCATION HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 036778/0662 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2015
From: CTB/MCGRAW-HILL LLC
To: DATA RECOGNITION CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 036762/0940 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 8, 2015
From: MCGRAW-HILL SCHOOL EDUCATION HOLDINGS LLC
To: CTB/MCGRAW-HILL LLC
Reel/Frame 036755/0610 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 16, 2014
From: MCGRAW-HILL SCHOOL EDUCATION HOLDINGS, LLC; CTB/MCGRAW-HILL, LLC; GROW.NET, INC.
To: BANK OF MONTREAL, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 032040/0330 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 19, 2013
From: THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC.
To: MCGRAW-HILL SCHOOL EDUCATION HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 030254/0053 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 26, 2013
From: MCGRAW-HILL SCHOOL EDUCATION HOLDINGS, LLC
To: BANK OF MONTREAL
Reel/Frame 030088/0771 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 1020190400 · Jul 25, 2002
Related Publication 20070065798A1 · Mar 22, 2007