Method for checking transmission backlash, and production machine or robot
To determine the backlash in an arrangement in which a motor moves a load via a transmission mechanism, a transducer is used which is present anyway in conventional production machines and which measures an angular position or translatory position of the drive element or a derivative of this quantity. Via the transducer the effect of the backlash on the actual position of the drive element is measured, the actual position being different from the desired position, which is defined by the forces or torques acting on the drive. On the basis of a frequency analysis, quantities can be derived which permit the use of threshold criteria. For example, the drive is driven with a periodic signal which is close to the absorber frequency, i.e. a frequency at which the absorption by the transmission mechanism is greatest.
1. A method for checking the transmission backlash in an arrangement, in which a motor moves a load via a transmission, a transducer being arranged on a drive element of the motor, comprising:
applying a first test control signal, which includes two periodic signals with two defined frequencies, to the motor in a base state of the arrangement;
measuring by the transducer a first measurement value in response to the first test control signal;
determining a first ratio of the amplitudes for the two defined frequencies from the first measurement value;
applying a second test control signal to the motor at a test time after applying the first test control signal;
measuring by the transducer a second measurement value in response to the second test control signal;
determining a second ratio of the amplitudes for the two defined frequencies from the second measurement value;
comparing the first ratio and second ratio of the amplitudes with one another or with a threshold value; and
determining, on the basis of a predefined criterion, of whether the transmission backlash at the test time deviates from the transmission backlash in the base state to such an extent that maintenance of the transmission is required.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the first test control signal and the second test control signal include a plurality of Fourier components for frequency portions between a lower and an upper frequency.
3. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the first test control signal and the second test control signal are noise signals.
4. The method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the first test control signal and the second test control signal are noise signals.
5. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the arrangement is a production machine, the production machine comprising:
a motor which includes a drive element on which a transducer determines an angular position and translatory position of the drive element and a value derived therefrom, wherein the motor adopts an operating state and a test state, and wherein the motor receives and processes test control signals in the test state,
a transmission via which the motor transmits a force to a load, and
an evaluation unit which evaluates measurement signals of the transducer as a function of the test control signals.
6. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the arrangement is a production machine, the production machine comprising:
a motor which includes a drive element on which a transducer determines an angular position and translatory position of the drive element or a value derived therefrom, wherein the motor adopts an operating state and a test state, and wherein the motor receives and processes test control signals in the test state,
a transmission via which the motor transmits a force to a load, and
an evaluation unit which evaluates measurement signals of the transducer as a function of the test control signals.
7. The method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the motor is designed to automatically adopt the test state for checking the transmission slack at test intervals, wherein the evaluation unit determines in the test state, on the basis of a predetermined criterion, whether maintenance of the transmission is required, and emits a warning signal in the event that maintenance is required.
8. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the arrangement is a robot, the robot comprising:
a motor which includes a drive element on which a transducer determines an angular position and translatory position of the drive element and a value derived therefrom, wherein the motor adopts an operating state and a test state, and wherein the motor receives and processes test control signals in the test state,
a transmission via which the motor transmits a force to a load, and
an evaluation unit which evaluates measurement signals of the transducer as a function of the test control signals.
9. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the arrangement is a robot, the robot comprising:
a motor which includes a drive element on which a transducer determines an angular position and translatory position of the drive element or a value derived therefrom, wherein the motor adopts an operating state and a test state, and wherein the motor receives and processes test control signals in the test state,
a transmission via which the motor transmits a force to a load, and
an evaluation unit which evaluates measurement signals of the transducer as a function of the test control signals.
10. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein the motor is designed to automatically adopt the test state for checking the transmission slack at test intervals, wherein the evaluation unit determines in the test state, on the basis of a predetermined criterion, whether maintenance of the transmission is required, and emits a warning signal in the event that maintenance is required.