IP Library › Granted Patent US 7,984,539
Granted Patent B2
US 7,984,539 · App. 11/984,292 · Granted Jul 26, 2011

Chamber replacing method

Assignees: Gigaphoton Inc.; Komatsu Ltd.; Ushio Denki Kabushiki Kaisha
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,984,539
App. No.
11/984,292
Granted
Jul 26, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

When a chamber of an oscillator and one or more amplifiers is to be replaced at the timing when a predetermined period elapses, one of the chambers of the oscillator and the amplifiers having a low allowable deterioration limit is detached and this chamber is attached in place of one of the chambers of the oscillator and the amplifiers other than the one having the low allowable deterioration limit. Thus, the chamber which has been used in one of the oscillator and amplifiers having a low allowable deterioration limit and has not reached the limit of deterioration is reused in one of the oscillator and the amplifiers other than the one having the low allowable deterioration limit. This enables efficient use of oscillator and amplifier chambers in a multistage amplification laser apparatus, minimizing the labor and parts consumed for replacement thereof.

Claims (20)

1. A chamber replacing method for use in a multistage amplification laser apparatus designed such that light generated in an oscillator chamber is amplified in one or more amplifier chambers for generating gain, the oscillator chamber and the amplifier chambers having same configuration, an allowable deterioration limit being different between the oscillator chamber and the one or more amplifier chambers, the method comprising:

detaching a chamber “a” from among the oscillator and the one or more amplifiers having a low allowable deterioration limit at a timing when a predetermined period elapses;

attaching a new chamber in place of the chamber “a”; and

detaching a chamber “b” from among the oscillator and the one or more amplifiers other than the one having the low allowable deterioration limit and attaching the chamber “a” in place of the chamber “b”.

2. The chamber replacing method according to claim 1 , wherein the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “b” is set to more than the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “a”, and the chamber “a” is attached in place of the chamber “b” at a timing when the deterioration of the chamber “a” reaches the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “a”.

3. The chamber replacing method according to claim 2 , wherein a degree of deterioration of each chamber is proportional to a number of laser shots, and the chamber “b” is replaced with the chamber “a” at a timing when the deterioration of the chamber “a” reaches the number of laser shots corresponding to the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “a”.

4. The chamber replacing method according to claim 1 , wherein the multistage amplification laser apparatus is a master oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) type, or an MOPA type having one or more power amplifiers added thereto.

5. The chamber replacing method according to claim 1 , wherein the multistage amplification laser apparatus is of an injection lock type or of a ring-type.

6. The chamber replacing method according to claim 1 , wherein the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “b” is set to at least twice the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “a”, and the chamber “a” is attached in place of the chamber “b” at a timing when the deterioration of the chamber “a” reaches the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “a”.

7. The chamber replacing method according to claim 6 , wherein a degree of deterioration of each chamber is proportional to a number of laser shots, and the chamber “b” is replaced with the chamber “a” at a timing when the deterioration of the chamber “a” reaches the number of laser shots corresponding to the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “a”.

8. A chamber replacing method for use in a multistage amplification laser apparatus designed such that light generated in an oscillator chamber is amplified in one or more amplifier chambers for generating gain, an allowable deterioration limit being different between the oscillator chamber and the one or more amplifier chambers, the method comprising:

detaching a chamber “a” from among the oscillator and the one or more amplifiers having a low allowable deterioration limit at a timing when a predetermined period elapses;

attaching a new chamber in place of the chamber “a”; and

detaching a chamber “b” from among the oscillator and the one or more amplifiers other than the one having the low allowable deterioration limit and attaching the chamber “a” in place of the chamber “b”.

9. The chamber replacing method according to claim 8 , wherein the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “b” is set to more than the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “a”, and the chamber “a” is attached in place of the chamber “b” at a timing when the deterioration of the chamber “a” reaches the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “a”.

10. The chamber replacing method according to claim 9 , wherein a degree of deterioration of each chamber is proportional to a number of laser shots, and the chamber “b” is replaced with the chamber “a” at a timing when the deterioration of the chamber “a” reaches the number of laser shots corresponding to the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “a”.

11. The chamber replacing method according to claim 8 , wherein the multistage amplification laser apparatus is a master oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) type, or an MOPA type having one or more power amplifiers added thereto.

12. The chamber replacing method according to claim 8 , wherein the multistage amplification laser apparatus is of an injection lock type or of a ring-type.

13. The chamber replacing method according to claim 8 , wherein the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “b” is set to at least twice the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “a”, and the chamber “a” is attached in place of the chamber “b” at a timing when the deterioration of the chamber “a” reaches the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “a”.

14. The chamber replacing method according to claim 13 , wherein a degree of deterioration of each chamber is proportional to a number of laser shots, and the chamber “b” is replaced with the chamber “a” at a timing when the deterioration of the chamber “a” reaches the number of laser shots corresponding to the allowable deterioration limit for the chamber “a”.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 1, 2016
From: KOMATSU LTD.
To: GIGAPHOTON INC.
Reel/Frame 039515/0596 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 15, 2007
From: FUJIMOTO, JUNICHI; MIZOGUCHI, HAKARU; ENAMI, TATSUO
To: GIGAPHOTON INC.; KOMATSU LTD.; USHIO DENKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 020163/0686 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP 2006-310317 · Nov 16, 2006 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20080115342A1 · May 22, 2008