IP Library › Granted Patent US 7,994,964
Granted Patent B2
US 7,994,964 · App. 12/301,215 · Granted Aug 9, 2011

Method for determining the position, notably in terms of elevation, of a target flying at very low altitude

Assignee: Thales
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,994,964
App. No.
12/301,215
Granted
Aug 9, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for determining the position notably the elevation of a target flying at very low altitude. An electromagnetic detection system extracts the measurement of the elevation on the basis of the amplitude of the interference signal produced by a signal emitted directly by the target and by a signal emitted by the target towards the ground then reflected by the ground towards the radar. Embodiments of the invention can notably be used within the framework of the guidance of drones in the final landing phase.

Claims (106)

1. Method for determining by an electromagnetic detection system an elevation of a target close to a ground, comprising the steps of:

receiving, by a reception antenna, a first signal emitted directly by a target;

receiving, by the reception antenna, a second signal emitted by the target towards the ground then reflected by the ground toward the electromagnetic detection system, wherein the reception antenna comprises a plurality of sub-arrays of radiating elements;

sampling an interference signal produced by the first signal and by the second signal at the level of the sub-arrays, to produce a sampled interference signal; and

determining the elevation of the target from an amplitude of the sampled interference signal,

wherein a frequency f of the sampled signal is a value which minimizes a function:

J

⁡

(

U

)

=

∑

i

,

k

⁢

r

i

+

k

+

r

i

-

k

-

2

⁢

r

i

⁢

cos

⁡

(

2

⁢

π

⁢

⁢

Uk

⁢

⁢

Δ

)

wherein

r i+k is a subtraction between a value of a signal received at sub-array i+k and the value of the signal received at sub-array i+k+1,

r i−k is a subtraction between the value of the signal received at sub-array i−k and the value of the signal received at sub-array i−k−1, and

Δ is a distance between the phase centers of two consecutive sub-arrays.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the steps of:

emitting a detection signal towards the target, wherein the signal re-emitted directly by the target is the first signal, and the signal re-emitted by the target towards the ground then reflected by the ground is the second signal.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sub-arrays comprise a line of radiating elements disposed in a substantially horizontal, parallel and uniform manner over the reception antenna as a whole.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sub-arrays are situated in a substantially vertical plane.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the following step:

calculating a ratio between an height h 2 of the target relative to the ground and a distance d projected on the ground between the electromagnetic detection system and the target according to the relationship: h 2 /d=λf/2 where λ is a wavelength of the first signal and f is a frequency of the interference signal.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising the following step:

obtaining the coordinates (x R , z R ) of a reflection point R and an angle α R between the tangent plane to the ground at the point R and the horizontal on the basis of a cost function:

C

⁡

(

r

)

=

h

2

-

z

R

+

x

R

×

α

R

x

R

-

h

2

d

-

x

R

wherein:

h 1 represents the height relative to the ground of the antenna,

h 2 represents an estimation of the height calculated in the case of plane and horizontal ground,

d represents the distance projected on the ground of the target from the antenna, and

the values (x R , z R , α R ) minimizing the cost function are the coordinates of the reflection point R.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising the following steps:

correcting the height of the target relative to the tangent plane to a value H 2 , using the value of the angle α R between the tangent plane at R to the terrain and the horizontal, as:

H 2 =h 2 +z R ( d−x R )×α R .

8. The method of claim 5 , further comprising the following step:

determining the height h 2 for a non-plane and non-horizontal ground on the basis of a point of reflection R of a signal re-emitted by the target towards the ground on non-horizontal ground, or of a height determined for plane and horizontal ground.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the following step:

correlating an amplitude and a phase of the signal received with a predefined replica.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the antenna used includes a sparse antenna.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the target comprises an active emitter.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the target includes a passive reflector.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the target includes a drone in the landing phase.

14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of determining a height h 2 of the target by a monopulse-type process if the value of the amplitude of the reflection coefficient is less than a predetermined threshold.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 26, 2009
From: CORNIC, PASCAL; BARRAUX, ERIC; GARREC, PATRICK
To: THALES
Reel/Frame 022453/0138 →
Priority Claims (1)
FR 06 04373 · May 16, 2006 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20090315755A1 · Dec 24, 2009