IP Library Granted Patent US 7,995,989
Granted Patent B2
US 7,995,989 · App. 09/751,765 · Granted Aug 9, 2011

Method and apparatus providing suppression of system access by use of confidence polygons, volumes and surfaces in a mobile satellite system

Assignee: Globalstar, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,995,989
App. No.
09/751,765
Granted
Aug 9, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed are methods and apparatus to control the actions of a user terminal (UT) located at a remote location, possibly far from a gateway (GW), which has an interface to the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) and/or to the Internet. The methods and apparatus provide for operation of a mobile satellite communication system having at least one gateway (GW), at least one user terminal (UT), and a constellation of satellites. The methods and apparatus allow access to the communication satellites by specifying an exclusion zone having a confidence limit (CL) associated therewith. The methods and apparatus selectively provide service to a UT depending on a determined location of the UT relative to the exclusion zone and on an estimated error (E) of the determined UT location, wherein location of the UT is determined by the UT, and transmitted to the GW, or location of the UT is determined by the GW.

Claims (29)

1. A method for operating a mobile satellite communication system having at least one gateway (GW), at least one user terminal (UT), and a constellation of satellites, comprising steps of:

allowing access to said constellation of communication satellites by specifying an exclusion zone having a confidence limit (CL) associated therewith; and

selectively providing service to a UT depending on a determined location of the UT relative to the exclusion zone and on an estimated error (E) of the determined UT location,

wherein location of the UT is determined by the UT, and transmitted to the GW, or wherein location of the UT is determined by the GW.

2. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the exclusion zone is specified to comprise at least one of a polygon that defines an area, a volume, or a surface.

3. A method as in claim 1 , wherein location of the UT is determined by the UT in cooperation with the GW.

4. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the exclusion zone is specified to comprise at least one of a polygon that defines an area, a volume, or a surface, and further considers at least one of RF obstructions and terrain features.

5. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the UT is granted service if the value of E is less than CL.

6. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the exclusion zone is specified to comprise a polygon defined by connected points on the surface of the earth.

7. A method as in claim 1 , wherein boundaries of the exclusion zone are static.

8. A method as in claim 1 , wherein boundaries of the exclusion zone are dynamic and capable of at least one of movement or change in shape.

9. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the value of E is a function of the accuracy of the UT local oscillator, and where information that specifies the accuracy of the UT local oscillator is stored in the UT.

10. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the value of E is a function of the accuracy of the UT local oscillator, and where information that specifies the accuracy of the UT local oscillator is stored in the GW.

11. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the value of E is a function of the accuracy of the UT local oscillator, and where information that specifies the accuracy of the UT local oscillator is stored in a home GW of the UT, and is transferred from the home GW to a serving GW when the UT is roaming.

12. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the value of E is a function of the accuracy of the UT local oscillator, and where information that specifies the accuracy of the UT local oscillator is stored in or is determined by the UT and is transferred to the GW.

13. A method as in claim 1 , wherein there are overlapping exclusion zones specified, each having a different value of CL.

14. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the exclusion zone is temporary and is established and removed as a function of time.

15. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the values of at least one of CL and E vary as a function of time.

16. A method as in claim 1 , wherein at least one of the location or shape of the exclusion zone varies as a function of a change in location of the UT.

17. A method as in claim 1 , wherein at least one of the location or shape of the exclusion zone varies as a function of a change in location of the GW.

18. A method as in claim 1 , wherein at least one of the location or shape of the exclusion zone varies as a function of a change in location of the protected site.

19. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the exclusion zone is shared between at least two gateways.

20. A method for operating a mobile satellite communication system having at least one gateway (GW), at least one user terminal (UT), and a constellation of satellites, comprising steps of:

allowing access to said constellation of communication satellites by specifying an exclusion zone having a confidence limit (CL) associated therewith; and

selectively providing service to a UT depending on a determined location of the UT relative to the exclusion zone and on an estimated error (E) of the determined UT location, wherein the exclusion zone is specified to comprise at least one of a volume defined by connected points on the surface of the earth and at least one point located above the surface of the earth or a surface defined by at least two connected points on the surface of the earth and at least one point located above the surface of the earth.

21. A method for operating a mobile satellite communication system having at least one gateway (GW), at least one user terminal (UT), and a constellation of satellites, comprising steps of:

allowing access to said constellation of communication satellites by specifying an exclusion zone having a confidence limit (CL) associated therewith; and

selectively providing service to a UT depending on a determined location of the UT relative to the exclusion zone and on an estimated error (E) of the determined UT location, wherein the UT is granted service if the value of E is less than CL, and where the GW sets the value of CL to be one of less than a possible minimum value of E for excluding all UTs from operating within the exclusion zone or greater than a possible maximum value of E for enabling all UTs to operate within the exclusion zone.

22. A mobile satellite communication system comprising at least one gateway (GW), at least one user terminal (UT), and a constellation of satellites, said GW comprising a controller for controlling operations of said UT and further comprising an interface to at least one of the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) or to the Internet, said GW storing a database containing at least one of a Confidence Polygon, a Confidence Volume, or a Confidence Surface to establish a geometric shape located on the earth, above the earth or in space, or combinations thereof, said GW further storing a static or a variable Confidence Limit (CL) value that is compared to a value of an error (E) in a position location of the UT, said controller acting upon the database and assigned or derived values of CL and E, to determine if a comparison of CL and E, combined with a current position of the UT, yields a certain result according to the operational mode of the GW controller, wherein depending on the operational mode of the GW the result of the comparison affects control of the UT or an external device attached to the UT, whereby the UT is forbidden or allowed to access the mobile satellite system or to make or receive a call, or depending on the operational mode of the GW the result of the comparison affects some operational characteristic of the UT to provide an ability to protect a site from UT emissions.

Assignments (11)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 12, 2023
From: GLOBALSTAR, INC.
To: APPLE INC.
Reel/Frame 063296/0431 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 4, 2023
From: GLAS TRUST CORPORATION LIMITED, AS SECURITY AGENT
To: GLOBALSTAR, INC.
Reel/Frame 063212/0249 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 12, 2021
From: BNP PARIBAS
To: GLOBALSTAR, INC.
Reel/Frame 058220/0028 →
GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS Recorded Nov 27, 2019
From: GLOBALST AR, INC.
To: GLAS TRUST CORPORATION LIMITED, AS SECURITY AGENT AND GRANTEE
Reel/Frame 051144/0001 →
GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 23, 2009
From: GLOBALSTAR, INC.
To: BNP PARIBAS
Reel/Frame 022856/0308 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 22, 2009
From: THERMO FUNDING COMPANY LLC
To: GLOBALSTAR, INC.
Reel/Frame 022856/0094 →
ASSIGNMENT OF CREDIT AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 14, 2008
From: WACHOVIA INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC
To: THERMO FUNDING COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 020353/0683 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 24, 2006
From: GLOBALSTAR, INC.
To: WACHOVIA INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 017982/0148 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 28, 2006
From: GLOBALSTAR LLC
To: GLOBALSTAR, INC.
Reel/Frame 017870/0117 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 22, 2006
From: GLOBALSTAR L.P.
To: GLOBALSTAR LLC
Reel/Frame 017838/0297 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 28, 2001
From: WIEDEMAN, ROBERT A.; SITES, MICHAEL J.; MONTE, PAUL A.
To: GLOBALSTAR L.P.
Reel/Frame 011638/0225 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20020123343A1 · Sep 5, 2002