IP Library Granted Patent US 8,063,824
Granted Patent B2
US 8,063,824 · App. 12/548,408 · Granted Nov 22, 2011

Magnitude-squared coherence filtering in a time difference of arrival (TDOA) or group delay interferometric geolocation system

Assignee: Soneticom, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,063,824
App. No.
12/548,408
Granted
Nov 22, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

In a geolocation system for determining a geolocation of a target emitter, a method for determining the geolocation. The method comprising: (a) receiving a signal transmitted from the target emitter at each one of a plurality of sensors, a frequency spectrum associated with each signal; (b) determining a pairwise correlation between a first signal and a second signal from among the plurality of signals, the pairwise correlation determined at frequencies or within frequency bands within the frequency spectrum of at least one of the first and second signals; (c) identifying pairwise correlations below a predetermined threshold; (d) filtering the first and second signals by reducing a magnitude of energy at one or more frequencies or within one or more frequency bands to produce first and second filtered signals, the one or more frequencies or the one or more frequency bands selected responsive to pairwise correlations below the threshold; (e) determining a time difference estimate responsive to the first and second filtered signals; (f) repeating steps (b) through (e) for signals received at other of the plurality of sensors to determine additional pairwise time difference estimates; and (g) determining the geolocation of the target emitter from the piecewise time difference estimates.

Claims (16)

1. In a geolocation system for determining a geolocation of a target emitter, a method for determining the geolocation comprising:

(a) receiving a signal transmitted from the target emitter at each one of a plurality of sensors, a frequency spectrum associated with each signal;

(b) determining a pairwise correlation between a first signal and a second signal from among the plurality of signals, the pairwise correlation determined at frequencies or within frequency bands within the frequency spectrum of at least one of the first and second signals;

(c) identifying pairwise correlations below a predetermined threshold;

(d) filtering the first and second signals by reducing a magnitude of energy at one or more frequencies or within one or more frequency bands to produce first and second filtered signals, the one or more frequencies or the one or more frequency bands selected responsive to pairwise correlations below the threshold;

(e) determining a time difference estimate responsive to the first and second filtered signals;

(f) repeating steps (b) through (e) for signals received at other of the plurality of sensors to determine additional pairwise time difference estimates; and

(g) determining the geolocation of the target emitter from the piecewise time difference estimates.

2. The geolocation system of claim 1 wherein a step (b) is executed only at frequencies or within frequency bands presenting a null in the frequency spectrum of at least one of the first and second signals.

3. The geolocation system of claim 1 wherein the predetermined threshold comprises a value of about 0.7.

4. The geolocation system of claim 1 wherein a step (a) further comprises digitizing each received signal.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the geolocation system comprises a direction-finding system, a time difference of arrival system, an angle of arrival system or a frequency difference of arrival system.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein a step (b) further comprises determining a pairwise correlation between the first and second signals from among the plurality of signals, the pairwise correlation determined at a predetermined number of evenly spaced-apart frequencies within the frequency spectrum of at least one of the first and second signals.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the pairwise correlation comprises a magnitude-squared coherence.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the magnitude-squared coherence is determined from |Pxy(f)|2/(Pxx(f)*Pyy(f)), where |Pxy(f)|2 is a magnitude-squared coherence of the cross power spectral density of signals X and Y, f is frequency in Hz, and Pxx(f) and Pyy(f) are power spectral densities of the signals X and Y.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein a step (b) further comprises determining a Fourier transform of the first and second signals then determining the pairwise correlation between the first and second signals at frequencies or within frequency bands within the frequency spectrum of at least one of the first and second signals.

Assignments (3)
MERGER Recorded Aug 28, 2013
From: DRS SONETICOM, INC.
To: DRS SIGNAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 031105/0203 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 28, 2013
From: SONETICOM, INC.
To: DRS SONETICOM, INC.
Reel/Frame 031122/0406 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2011
From: FINNEY, CARL; WHITE, JEFF
To: SONETICOM, INC
Reel/Frame 026319/0144 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61092042 · Aug 26, 2008
Related Publication 20100182200A1 · Jul 22, 2010