IP Library Granted Patent US 8,265,945
Granted Patent B2
US 8,265,945 · App. 12/655,250 · Granted Sep 11, 2012

Template modification based on deviation from compliant execution of the template

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,265,945
App. No.
12/655,250
Granted
Sep 11, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computationally implemented method includes, but is not limited to: determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more target outcomes when one or more emulatable aspects included in the template are emulated by the plurality of end users, the one or more emulatable aspects being based on one or more relevant reported aspects of one or more source users that were deemed to have been relevant to achieving the one or more target outcomes; and modifying the template based, at least in part, on determining that the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template In addition to the foregoing, other method aspects are described in the claims, drawings, and text forming a part of the present disclosure.

Claims (97)

1. A computationally-implemented system, comprising:

means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more target outcomes when one or more emulatable aspects included in the template are emulated by the plurality of end users, the one or more emulatable aspects being based on one or more relevant reported aspects of one or more source users that were deemed to have been relevant to achieving the one or more target outcomes; and

means for modifying the template based, at least in part, on determining that the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template, wherein said means for modifying the template based, at least in part, on determining that the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template, comprises:

means for modifying the template to include at least one plausible emulatable aspect that has been determined to have been successfully emulated by at least a portion of the plurality of end users.

2. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , wherein said means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more target outcomes when one or more emulatable aspects included in the template are emulated by the plurality of end users, the one or more emulatable aspects being based on one or more relevant reported aspects of one or more source users that were deemed to have been relevant to achieving the one or more target outcomes, comprises:

means for determining whether the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template by at least receiving data indicating reported aspects of the plurality of end users.

3. The computationally-implemented system of claim 2 , wherein said means for determining whether the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template by at least receiving data indicating reported aspects of the plurality of end users, comprises:

means for receiving the data indicating the reported aspects of the plurality of end users including receiving data indicating at least one of the reported aspects via one or more end user log entries.

4. The computationally-implemented system of claim 3 , wherein said means for receiving the data indicating the reported aspects of the plurality of end users including receiving data indicating at least one of the reported aspects via one or more end user log entries, comprises:

means for receiving the data indicating at least one of the reported aspects via one or more social networking entries.

5. The computationally-implemented system of claim 4 , wherein said means for receiving the data indicating at least one of the reported aspects via one or more social networking entries, comprises:

means for receiving the data indicating at least one of the reported aspects via one or more blog entries.

6. The computationally-implemented system of claim 4 , wherein said means for receiving the data indicating at least one of the reported aspects via one or more social networking entries, comprises:

means for receiving the data indicating at least one of the reported aspects via one or more status reports.

7. The computationally-implemented system of claim 3 , wherein said means for receiving the data indicating the reported aspects of the plurality of end users including receiving data indicating at least one of the reported aspects via one or more end user log entries, comprises:

means for receiving the data indicating at least one of the reported aspects via one or more journal entries.

8. The computationally-implemented system of claim 3 , wherein said means for receiving the data indicating the reported aspects of the plurality of end users including receiving data indicating at least one of the reported aspects via one or more end user log entries, comprises:

means for receiving the one or more end user log entries including the data indicating at least one of the reported aspects from one or more sensors.

9. The computationally-implemented system of claim 3 , wherein said means for receiving the data indicating the reported aspects of the plurality of end users including receiving data indicating at least one of the reported aspects via one or more end user log entries, comprises:

means for receiving the one or more end user log entries including the data indicating at least one of the reported aspects from one or more sensor integrated devices.

10. The computationally-implemented system of claim 2 , wherein said means for determining whether the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template by at least receiving data indicating reported aspects of the plurality of end users, comprises:

means for determining whether the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template by at least comparing the reported aspects with the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template.

11. The computationally-implemented system of claim 10 , wherein said means for determining whether the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template by at least comparing the reported aspects with the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template, comprises:

means for identifying which of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template were not emulated at all by one or more of the end users based on the comparison of the reported aspects with the one or more emulatable aspects.

12. The computationally-implemented system of claim 11 , wherein said means for identifying which of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template were not emulated at all by one or more of the end users based on the comparison of the reported aspects with the one or more emulatable aspects, comprises:

means for identifying which of the plurality of end users did not emulate at all the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template that were identified as being not emulated at all by one or more of the end users.

13. The computationally-implemented system of claim 10 , wherein said means for determining whether the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template by at least comparing the reported aspects with the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template, comprises:

means for identifying which of the one or more emulatable aspects included in template were only partially emulated by one or more of the end users based on the comparison of the reported aspects with the one or more emulatable aspects.

14. The computationally-implemented system of claim 13 , wherein said means for identifying which of the one or more emulatable aspects included in template were only partially emulated by one or more of the end users based on the comparison of the reported aspects with the one or more emulatable aspects, comprises:

means for identifying which of the plurality of end users only partially emulated the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template that were identified as being only partially emulated by one or more of the end users.

15. The computationally-implemented system of claim 10 , wherein said means for determining whether the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template by at least comparing the reported aspects with the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template, comprises:

means for identifying which of the reported aspects of the plurality of end users represent one or more replacement aspects for the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template.

16. The computationally-implemented system of claim 10 , wherein said means for determining whether the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template by at least comparing the reported aspects with the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template, comprises:

means for determining whether the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template by at least determining whether the plurality of end users did not emulate a plurality of emulatable aspects included in the template in a particular order as defined by the template.

17. The computationally-implemented system of claim 16 , wherein said means for determining whether the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template by at least determining whether the plurality of end users did not emulate a plurality of emulatable aspects included in the template in a particular order as defined by the template, comprises:

means for determining whether the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template by at least determining whether the plurality of end users did not emulate a plurality of emulatable aspects included in the template in a particular temporal order as defined by the template.

18. The computationally-implemented system of claim 16 , wherein said means for determining whether the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template by at least determining whether the plurality of end users did not emulate a plurality of emulatable aspects included in the template in a particular order as defined by the template, comprises:

means for determining whether the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template by at least determining whether the plurality of end users did not emulate a plurality of emulatable aspects included in the template in a specific time order as defined by the template.

19. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , wherein said means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more target outcomes when one or more emulatable aspects included in the template are emulated by the plurality of end users, the one or more emulatable aspects being based on one or more relevant reported aspects of one or more source users that were deemed to have been relevant to achieving the one or more target outcomes, comprises:

means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more health or medical outcomes.

20. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , wherein said means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more target outcomes when one or more emulatable aspects included in the template are emulated by the plurality of end users, the one or more emulatable aspects being based on one or more relevant reported aspects of one or more source users that were deemed to have been relevant to achieving the one or more target outcomes, comprises:

means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more athletic or gaming outcomes.

21. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , wherein said means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more target outcomes when one or more emulatable aspects included in the template are emulated by the plurality of end users, the one or more emulatable aspects being based on one or more relevant reported aspects of one or more source users that were deemed to have been relevant to achieving the one or more target outcomes, comprises:

means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more occupational outcomes.

22. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , wherein said means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more target outcomes when one or more emulatable aspects included in the template are emulated by the plurality of end users, the one or more emulatable aspects being based on one or more relevant reported aspects of one or more source users that were deemed to have been relevant to achieving the one or more target outcomes, comprises:

means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more social or leisure outcomes.

23. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , wherein said means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more target outcomes when one or more emulatable aspects included in the template are emulated by the plurality of end users, the one or more emulatable aspects being based on one or more relevant reported aspects of one or more source users that were deemed to have been relevant to achieving the one or more target outcomes, comprises:

means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more sexual intimacy outcomes.

24. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , wherein said means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more target outcomes when one or more emulatable aspects included in the template are emulated by the plurality of end users, the one or more emulatable aspects being based on one or more relevant reported aspects of one or more source users that were deemed to have been relevant to achieving the one or more target outcomes, comprises:

means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more academic or intellectual outcomes.

25. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , wherein said means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more target outcomes when one or more emulatable aspects included in the template are emulated by the plurality of end users, the one or more emulatable aspects being based on one or more relevant reported aspects of one or more source users that were deemed to have been relevant to achieving the one or more target outcomes, comprises:

means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more spiritual or religious outcomes.

26. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , wherein said means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more target outcomes when one or more emulatable aspects included in the template are emulated by the plurality of end users, the one or more emulatable aspects being based on one or more relevant reported aspects of one or more source users that were deemed to have been relevant to achieving the one or more target outcomes, comprises:

means for determining whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more user state outcomes.

27. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , wherein said means for modifying the template based, at least in part, on determining that the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template, comprises:

means for modifying the template by modifying at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template.

28. The computationally-implemented system of claim 27 , wherein said means for modifying the template by modifying at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template, comprises:

means for modifying the at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template by revising the at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template.

29. The computationally-implemented system of claim 27 , wherein said means for modifying the template by modifying at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template, comprises:

means for modifying the at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template by replacing the at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template with at least one replacement emulatable aspect.

30. The computationally-implemented system of claim 27 , wherein said means for modifying the template by modifying at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template, comprises:

means for modifying the at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template by deleting the at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template.

31. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , wherein said means for modifying the template based, at least in part, on determining that the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template, comprises:

means for modifying the template by adding to the template at least one additional emulatable aspect.

32. The computationally-implemented system of claim 31 , wherein said means for modifying the template by adding to the template at least one additional emulatable aspect, comprises:

means for adding to the template the at least one additional emulatable aspect by defining in the template one or more relationships between the at least one additional emulatable aspect and the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template.

33. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , wherein said means for modifying the template based, at least in part, on determining that the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template, comprises:

means for modifying the template by modifying one or more relationships between a plurality of emulatable aspects included in the template.

34. The computationally-implemented system of claim 33 , wherein said means for modifying the template by modifying one or more relationships between a plurality of emulatable aspects included in the template, comprises:

means for modifying the template by modifying one or more temporal relationships between the plurality of emulatable aspects included in the template.

35. The computationally-implemented system of claim 33 , wherein said means for modifying the template by modifying one or more relationships between a plurality of emulatable aspects included in the template, comprises:

means for modifying the template by modifying one or more specific time relationships between the plurality of emulatable aspects included in the template.

36. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , wherein said means for modifying the template to include at least one plausible emulatable aspect that has been determined to have been successfully emulated by at least a portion of the plurality of end users, comprises:

means for modifying the template to include at least one plausible emulatable aspect that has been determined to have been successfully emulated by a majority of the plurality of end users.

37. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , wherein said means for modifying the template based, at least in part, on determining that the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template, comprises:

means for modifying the template to include at least one emulatable aspect that was provided by at least analyzing a plurality of reported aspects of the plurality of end users, the plurality of reported aspects deviating from at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template.

38. The computationally-implemented system of claim 37 , wherein said means for modifying the template to include at least one emulatable aspect that was provided by at least analyzing a plurality of reported aspects of the plurality of end users, the plurality of reported aspects deviating from at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template, comprises:

means for modifying the template to include at least one mean value emulatable aspect that was at least provided by developing a mean value for a plurality of reported aspects of the plurality of end users, the reported aspects corresponding to and deviating from at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template.

39. The computationally-implemented system of claim 37 , wherein said means for modifying the template to include at least one emulatable aspect that was provided by at least analyzing a plurality of reported aspects of the plurality of end users, the plurality of reported aspects deviating from at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template, comprises:

means for modifying the template to include at least one average value emulatable aspect that was at least provided by developing an average value for a plurality of reported aspects of the plurality of end users, the plurality of reported aspects corresponding to and deviating from at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template.

40. The computationally-implemented system of claim 37 , wherein said means for modifying the template to include at least one emulatable aspect that was provided by at least analyzing a plurality of reported aspects of the plurality of end users, the plurality of reported aspects deviating from at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template, comprises:

means for modifying the template to include at least one emulatable aspect that was provided by determining from a plurality of reported aspects of the plurality of end users an end user aspect that was reported more than once, the plurality of reported aspects corresponding to and deviating from at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template.

41. The computationally-implemented system of claim 40 , wherein said means for modifying the template to include at least one emulatable aspect that was provided by determining from a plurality of reported aspects of the plurality of end users an end user aspect that was reported more than once, the plurality of reported aspects corresponding to and deviating from at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template, comprises:

means for modifying the template to include at least one emulatable aspect that was provided by determining a reported aspect that was most commonly reported aspect from a plurality of reported aspects of the plurality of end users, the plurality of reported aspects corresponding to and deviating from at least one of the one or more emulatable aspects included in the template.

42. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , wherein said means for modifying the template based, at least in part, on determining that the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template, comprises:

means for modifying the template based, at least in part, on determining that the plurality of end users deviated from the compliant execution of the template, the plurality of end users determined to have achieved the one or more target outcomes even though the template was not compliantly executed by the plurality of end users.

43. The computationally-implemented system of claim 1 , further comprising:

means for presenting the modified template.

44. A method for modifying one or more templates, comprising:

determining, by electrical circuitry, whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more target outcomes when one or more emulatable aspects included in the template are emulated by the plurality of end users, the one or more emulatable aspects being based on one or more relevant reported aspects of one or more source users that were deemed to have been relevant to achieving the one or more target outcomes; and

modifying the template based, at least in part, on determining that the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template, wherein said modifying the template based, at least in part, on determining that the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template comprises:

modifying the template to include at least one plausible emulatable aspect that has been determined to have been successfully emulated by at least a portion of the plurality of end users.

45. A server, comprising:

a deviation determining module configured to determine whether a plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing a template designed to facilitate the plurality of end users in achieving one or more target outcomes when one or more emulatable aspects included in the template are emulated by the plurality of end users, the one or more emulatable aspects being based on one or more relevant reported aspects of one or more source users that were deemed to have been relevant to achieving the one or more target outcomes;

a template modifying module configured to modify the template based, at least in part, on determining that the plurality of end users deviated from compliantly executing the template, wherein said template modifying module comprises:

a template modifying module configured to modify the template to include at least one plausible emulatable aspect that has been determined to have been successfully emulated by at least a portion of the plurality of end users; and

one or more processors.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 28, 2020
From: THE INVENTION SCIENCE FUND I LLC
To: FREEDE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 051994/0825 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 2, 2012
From: SEARETE LLC
To: THE INVENTION SCIENCE FUND I, LLC
Reel/Frame 028475/0893 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 23, 2010
From: FIRMINGER, SHAWN P.; GARMS, JASON; HYDE, RODERICK A.; JUNG, EDWARD K.Y.; KARKANIAS, CHRIS D.; LEUTHARDT, ERIC C.; LEVIEN, ROYCE A.; LORD, RICHARD T.; LORD, ROBERT W; MALAMUD, MARK A.; RINALDO, JOHN D., JR.; TEGREENE, CLARENCE T.; TOLLE, KRISTIN M.; WOOD, LOWELL L., JR.
To: SEARETE LLC
Reel/Frame 024277/0268 →
Continuity (21)
Continuation In Part 12584489 · Sep 3, 2009
Continuation In Part 12584653 · Sep 8, 2009
Continuation In Part 12587018 · Sep 29, 2009
Continuation In Part 12587127 · Sep 30, 2009
Continuation In Part 12590027 · Oct 29, 2009
Continuation In Part 12590039 · Oct 30, 2009
Continuation In Part 12590600 · Nov 10, 2009
Continuation In Part 12590841 · Nov 12, 2009
Continuation In Part 12592075 · Nov 17, 2009
Continuation In Part 12592161 · Nov 18, 2009
Continuation In Part 12592544 · Nov 24, 2009
Continuation In Part 12592548 · Nov 25, 2009
Continuation In Part 12592944 · Dec 3, 2009
Continuation In Part 12592946 · Dec 4, 2009
Continuation In Part 12653117 · Dec 7, 2009
Continuation In Part 12653180 · Dec 8, 2009
Continuation In Part 12653387 · Dec 10, 2009
Continuation In Part 12653386 · Dec 11, 2009
Continuation In Part 12653972 · Dec 17, 2009
Continuation In Part 12655075 · Dec 21, 2009
Related Publication 20110054940A1 · Mar 3, 2011