IP Library Granted Patent US 8,293,481
Granted Patent B2
US 8,293,481 · App. 12/514,275 · Granted Oct 23, 2012

Biomarkers for chronic vascular dysfunction

Assignee: Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,293,481
App. No.
12/514,275
Granted
Oct 23, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

Materials and methods for using biomarkers to determine prognosis and response to treatment in subjects having chronic vascular dysfunction.

Claims (40)

1. A method for evaluating the prognosis of a subject with a chronic disease where there is vascular dysfunction, comprising providing a biological sample from said subject, performing an ELISA to measure in said biological sample the expression level of TAO kinase I, glutaminase 2 (Gls2), v-raf-1 murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1 (Raf1), or bile acid-Coenzyme A amino acid N-acyltransferase (Baat), and classifying the prognosis of the subject as favorable if the expression level of TAO kinase I, Gls2, Raf1, or Baat in the biological sample is less than a control expression level of TAO kinase I, Gls2, Raf1, or Baat, or classifying the prognosis of the subject as poor if the expression level of TAO kinase I, Gls2, Raf1, or Baat in the biological sample is not less than the control expression level of TAO kinase I, Gls2, Raf1, or Baat and wherein the control expression level is an expression level in a biological sample from a normal subject, a standard expression level in biological samples from a population of normal subjects, or a previously determined expression level in a biological sample from the subject.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the disease is chronic heart failure (CHF).

3. A method for evaluating the prognosis of a subject with a chronic disease where there is vascular dysfunction, comprising providing a biological sample from said subject, performing an ELISA to measure in said biological sample the expression level of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), Rho kinase 2, or fragile X mental retardation syndrome 1 homolog (Fmr1), and classifying the prognosis as favorable if the expression level of IL-1β, Rho kinase 2, or Fmr1 in the biological sample is similar to or less than a control expression level of IL-1β, Rho kinase 2, or Fmr1, or classifying the prognosis as poor if the expression level of IL-1β, Rho kinase 2, or Fmr1 in the biological sample is greater than the control expression level of IL-1β, Rho kinase 2, or Fmr1, and wherein:

the control expression level is an expression level of IL-1β, Rho kinase 2, or Fmr1 in a biological sample from a normal subject, or a standard expression level of IL-1β, Rho kinase 2, or Fmr1 in biological samples from a population of normal subjects, and the prognosis is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to the control expression level, or classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is greater than the control expression level, or

the control expression level is a previously determined expression level of IL-1β, Rho kinase 2, or Fmr1 in a biological sample from the subject, and the prognosis is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is less than the control expression level, or classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to or greater than the control expression level.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the disease is CHF.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the control expression level is an expression level of IL-1β, Rho kinase 2, or Fmr1 in a biological sample from a normal subject, or a standard expression level of IL-1β, Rho kinase 2, or Fmr1 in biological samples from a population of normal subjects, wherein the prognosis is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to the control expression level, and wherein the prognosis is classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is greater than the control expression level.

6. The method of claim 3 , wherein the control expression level is a previously determined expression level of IL-1β, Rho kinase 2, or Fmr1 in a biological sample from the subject, wherein the prognosis is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is less than the control expression level, and wherein the prognosis is classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to or greater than the control expression level.

7. A method for assessing the response to treatment of a subject diagnosed as having a chronic disease where there is vascular dysfunction, the method comprising:

(a) providing a biological sample from said subject;

(b) performing an ELISA to measure the expression level of a gene in said biological sample, wherein the gene is TAOK1, GLS2, RAF1, or BAAT; and

(c) classifying the response as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is less than a control expression level of the gene, or classifying the response as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is not less than the control expression level of the gene, wherein the control expression level is an expression level in a biological sample from a normal subject, a standard expression level in biological samples from a population of normal subjects, or a previously determined expression level in a biological sample from the subject.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the disease is CHF.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein the treatment is captopril therapy.

10. A method for assessing the response to treatment of a subject diagnosed as having a chronic disease where there is vascular dysfunction, the method comprising:

(a) providing a biological sample from said subject;

(b) performing an ELISA to measure the expression level of a gene in said biological sample, wherein the gene is IL-1β, ROCK2, or FMR1; and

(c) classifying the response as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to or less than a control expression level of the gene, or classifying the response as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is greater than the control expression level of the gene, wherein:

the control expression level is an expression level in a biological sample from a normal subject, or a standard expression level in biological samples from a population of normal subjects, and the response is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to the control expression level of the gene, or classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is greater than the control expression level of the gene, or

the control expression level is a previously determined expression level in a biological sample from the subject, and the response is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is less than the control expression level of the gene, or classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to or greater than the control expression level of the gene.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the disease is CHF.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the control expression level is an expression level in a biological sample from a normal subject, or a standard expression level in biological samples from a population of normal subjects, wherein the response is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to the control expression level of the gene, and wherein the response is classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is greater than the control expression level of the gene.

13. The method of claim 10 , wherein the control expression level is a previously determined expression level in a biological sample from the subject, wherein the response is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is less than the control expression level of the gene, and wherein the response is classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to or greater than the control expression level of the gene.

14. The method of claim 10 , wherein the treatment is captopril therapy.

15. A method for evaluating the prognosis of a subject with a chronic disease where there is vascular dysfunction, comprising providing a biological sample from said subject, performing an ELISA to measure in said biological sample the expression level of membrane interacting protein RGS16 (Mir16), angiotensinogen (Agt), or chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 12 (Cxcl12), and classifying the prognosis of the subject as favorable if the expression level of Mir16, Agt, or Cxcl12 in the biological sample is greater than or similar to a control expression level of Mir16, Agt, or Cxcl12, or classifying the prognosis as poor if the expression level of Mir16, Agt, or Cxcl12 in the biological sample is less than the control expression level of Mir16, Agt, or Cxcl12, and wherein:

the control expression level is an expression level of Mir16, Agt, or Cxcl12 in a biological sample from a normal subject, or a standard expression level of Mir16, Agt, or Cxcl12 in biological samples from a population of normal subjects, and the prognosis is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to the control expression level, or classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is less than the control expression level, or

the control expression level is a previously determined expression level of Mir16, Agt, or Cxcl12 in a biological sample from the subject, and the prognosis is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is greater than the control expression level, or classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is less than or similar to the control expression level.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the disease is CHF.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the control expression level is an expression level of Mir16, Agt, or Cxcl12 in a biological sample from a normal subject, or a standard expression level of Mir16, Agt, or Cxcl12 in biological samples from a population of normal subjects, wherein the prognosis is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to the control expression level, and wherein the prognosis is classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is less than the control expression level.

18. The method of claim 15 , wherein the control expression level is a previously determined expression level of Mir16, Agt, or Cxcl12 in a biological sample from the subject, wherein the prognosis is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is greater than the control expression level, and wherein the prognosis is classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is less than or similar to the control expression level.

19. A method for assessing the response to treatment of a subject diagnosed as having a chronic disease where there is vascular dysfunction, the method comprising:

(a) providing a biological sample from said subject;

(b) performing an ELISA to measure the expression level of a gene in said biological sample, wherein the gene is MIR16, AGT, or CXCL12; and

(c) classifying the response as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to or greater than a control expression level of the gene, or classifying the response as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is less than the control expression level of the gene, wherein:

the control expression level is an expression level in a biological sample from a normal subject, or a standard expression level in biological samples from a population of normal subjects, and the response is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to the control expression level of the gene, or classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is less than the control expression level of the gene, or

the control expression level is a previously determined expression level in a biological sample from the subject, and the response is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is greater than the control expression level of the gene, or classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to or less than the control expression level of the gene.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the disease is CHF.

21. The method of claim 19 , wherein the control expression level is an expression level in a biological sample from a normal subject, or a standard expression level in biological samples from a population of normal subjects, wherein the response is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to the control expression level of the gene, and wherein the response is classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is less than the control expression level of the gene.

22. The method of claim 19 , wherein the control expression level is a previously determined expression level in a biological sample from the subject, wherein the response is classified as favorable if the expression level in the biological sample is greater than the control expression level of the gene, and wherein the response is classified as poor if the expression level in the biological sample is similar to or less than the control expression level of the gene.

23. The method of claim 19 , wherein the treatment is captopril therapy.

Assignments (3)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Aug 4, 2010
From: MAYO FOUNDATION
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 024784/0898 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 28, 2009
From: BROZOVICH, FRANK V; CHEN, FRANK C; FRANTZ, ROBERT P; OGUT, OZGUR
To: MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH
Reel/Frame 022745/0045 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded May 19, 2009
From: MAYO FOUNDATION
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 022701/0257 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 60865224 · Nov 10, 2006
Related Publication 20100159478A1 · Jun 24, 2010