IP Library Granted Patent US 8,389,231
Granted Patent B2
US 8,389,231 · App. 11/990,718 · Granted Mar 5, 2013

Assays, method and compositions that exploit a mycobacterial iron acquistion pathway in cells

Inventor: John T. Groves (Princeton, NJ)
Assignee: The Trustees of Princeton University
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,389,231
App. No.
11/990,718
Granted
Mar 5, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

Assays for the identification of antibacterial agents that inhibit mycobacterial growth by interfering with the iron acquisition pathway in host cells are disclosed. Also disclosed are methods of inhibiting mycobacterial growth by interfering with iron uptake or by delivering antibacterial agents to mycobacteria in host cells through the iron uptake pathway, as well as certain compounds that are useful in the assay methods, and also as antibacterial agents.

Claims (18)

1. A method of identifying compounds that interfere with mycobactin-mediated iron acquisition by mycobacteria within phagosomes of host cells, wherein interference with the mycobactin-mediated iron acquisition results from interference with one or more of: transport of apo-mycobactin across phagosome membranes into the host cytoplasm, formation of ferric mycobactin complexes in the host cytoplasm, accumulation of ferric mycobactin complexes in lipid droplets, or delivery of ferric mycobactin complexes to phagosomes from lipid droplets, the method comprising the steps of:

a) exposing a first set of host cells, in the absence of a test compound, to an isolated mycobactin component selected from apo-mycobactin, ferric mycobactin complex, or a ferric mycobactin complex analog or derivative that binds to lipid droplets, under conditions that permit entry of the mycobactin component into the host cell cytoplasm, formation of ferric mycobactin complexes within the host cells, accumulation of ferric mycobactin complexes in lipid droplets and delivery of ferric mycobactin complexes to phagosomes from lipid droplets;

b) exposing a second set of host cells, in the presence of the test compound, to the isolated mycobactin component of step a) under equivalent conditions as applied in step a);

c) measuring in each of the first and second sets of host cells the amount of one or more of:

i) mycobactin components present in the host cytoplasm;

ii) ferric mycobactin complexes formed from apo-mycobactin;

iii) ferric mycobactin complexes or ferric mycobactin complex analogs or derivatives associated with lipid droplets; and

iv) ferric mycobactin complexes or ferric mycobactin analogs or derivatives present within phagosomes;

d) comparing the measured amounts from step c) for the first and second sets of host cells; and

e) identifying whether the test compound interfered with mycobactin-mediated iron acquisition, wherein a decrease in any of (i)-(iv) in the presence of the test compound, as compared with in the absence of the test compound, is indicative that the test compound interferes with mycobactin-mediated iron acquisition by mycobacteria within phagosomes of host cells.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the host cells are macrophage or macrophage-like cells.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the host cells are cultured cells.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the mycobactin component is mycobactin J or mycobactic acid J.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the mycobactin component is apo-mycobactin and the amount of apo-mycobactin together with ferric mycobactin complex within host cells is measured to provide a total amount of mycobactin components in the host cells, wherein a decrease in the total amount of mycobactin components in the presence of the test compound, as compared with in the absence of the test compound, is indicative that the test compound can interfere with transport of apo-mycobactin across phagosome membranes into the host cytoplasm.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the mycobactin component is apo-mycobactin and the amount of ferric mycobactin complex within host cells is measured, wherein a decrease in amount of ferric mycobactin complex in the presence of the test compound, as compared with in the absence of the test compound, is indicative that the test compound interferes with formation of ferric mycobactin complexes in host cells.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the mycobactin component is a ferric mycobactin complex or a ferric mycobactin complex analog or derivative that binds to lipid droplets, and the amount of ferric mycobactin complex or ferric mycobactin complex analog or derivatives accumulated in the lipid droplets is measured, wherein a decrease in the amount of ferric mycobactin complex or ferric mycobactin complex analog or derivatives accumulated in the lipid droplets in the presence of the test compound, as compared with in the absence of the test compound, is indicative that the test compound interferes with accumulation of ferric mycobactin complexes in host cell lipid droplets.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the mycobactin component is a ferric mycobactin complex or a ferric mycobactin complex analog or derivative that binds to lipid droplets, and the amount of ferric mycobactin complex or ferric mycobactin complex analog or derivatives delivered to phagosomes is measured, wherein a decrease in the amount of ferric mycobactin complex or ferric mycobactin complex analog or derivatives delivered to phagosomes in the presence of the test compound, as compared with in the absence of the test compound, is indicative that the test compound interferes with delivery of ferric mycobactin complexes from the lipid droplets to the phagosomes.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the mycobactin component is a ferric mycobactin complex analog or derivative selected from gallium-mycobactin or gallium-mycobactic acid.

Assignments (3)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Aug 2, 2013
From: PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
To: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 030939/0683 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 25, 2009
From: GROVES, JOHN T., MR.
To: THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 022883/0463 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 2, 2008
From: GROVES, JOHN T., MR.
To: THE TRUSTEES IF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 021028/0800 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 60710531 · Aug 23, 2005
Provisional Application 60784984 · Mar 23, 2006
Related Publication 20090297647A1 · Dec 3, 2009