IP Library Granted Patent US 8,391,331
Granted Patent B2
US 8,391,331 · App. 10/566,033 · Granted Mar 5, 2013

Method of charging fine-grained metals into an electric-arc furnace

Inventors: Heinz Eichberger (Bad Soden, DE); Karl-Josef Schneider (Schermbeck, DE)
Assignees: Outotec Oyj; SMS Siemag AG
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,391,331
App. No.
10/566,033
Granted
Mar 5, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

In a method of charging fine-grained metals, in particular directly reduced iron (DRI), into an electric-arc furnace ( 1 ), the metal is supplied via a downpipe ( 12 ) to an opening ( 10 ) provided in the furnace roof ( 4 ), is introduced into the furnace ( 1 ) through this opening ( 10 ) as bulk material stream ( 11 ), and falls onto the melt ( 13 ) merely by gravity. Further, an electric-arc furnace ( 1 ) suited for this purpose is described. A rather loss-free introduction even of fine-grained material having a mean grain size of less than 1 mm is achieved by passing the bulk material stream ( 11 ) through a dosing orifice ( 8 ) after the downpipe ( 12 ) and before entering the furnace ( 1 ). The bulk material stream ( 11 ) then enters the furnace essentially undisturbed.

Claims (26)

1. A method of charging a bulk material including fine-grained metal, metal compounds or a mixture of two or more metals or metal compounds, into an electric-arc furnace, in which the bulk material is supplied essentially continuously via at least one downpipe to one or more openings provided in the furnace roof, is introduced into the furnace through said at least one opening as a bulk material stream, and falls onto the melt merely by gravity, wherein before entering the furnace after the downpipe the bulk material stream is passed through a dosing orifice to control a material flow rate so as to maintain at least a portion of the downpipe filled with the bulk material so that the bulk material stream enters the furnace essentially undisturbed, so that the bulk material stream is not substantially enlarged during the fall onto the melt.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein after the downpipe the bulk material stream is passed through a round or oval dosing orifice.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein after the downpipe the bulk material stream is passed through an iris.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the dosing orifice is inclined by not more than 25° with respect to the horizontal.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the dosing orifice is arranged horizontally.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the mass flow of the bulk material stream in the downpipe is kept larger than the throughput through the dosing orifice.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein after the dosing orifice the bulk material stream is passed through a protective tube.

8. The method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the protective tube is cooled.

9. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the metal, metal compound or mixture of two or more metals or metal compounds introduced into the furnace has a mean grain size of less than 1 mm.

10. An electric-arc furnace for charging with fine-grained directly reduced iron or ores, comprising a furnace roof having at least one opening, the at least one opening of the furnace roof being connected with a downpipe leading to the furnace lid from outside for supplying the material to be charged, wherein at an opening of the downpipe into the furnace an adjustable dosing orifice is configured to control a flow of the material into the furnace is provided.

11. The electric-arc furnace as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the dosing orifice is an iris.

12. The electric-arc furnace as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the dosing orifice has at least two slides movable with respect to each other.

13. The electric-arc furnace as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the dosing orifice is inclined with respect to the horizontal by not more than 25°.

14. The electric-arc furnace as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the dosing orifice is arranged horizontally.

15. The electric-arc furnace as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the bulk recipient vessel constitutes a mass flow silo.

16. The electric-arc furnace as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the downpipe is arranged vertically.

17. The electric-arc furnace as claimed in claim 10 , wherein below the dosing orifice a preferably vertical protective tube is provided.

18. The electric-arc furnace as claimed in claim 17 , wherein the length of the protective tube is about 1 to 3 times the maximum diameter of the stream of bulk material.

19. The electric-arc furnace as claimed in claim 17 wherein the protective tube is cooled.

20. The electric-arc furnace as claimed in claim 17 , wherein the diameter of the protective tube is at least twice as large as the opening diameter of the dosing orifice.

21. The electric-arc furnace as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the maximum opening diameter of the dosing orifice is smaller than or equal to the diameter of the downpipe.

22. A method of charging a bulk material including fine-grained metal, metal compounds or a mixture of two or more metals or metal compounds, into an electric-arc furnace, in which the bulk material is supplied essentially continuously via at least one downpipe to one or more openings provided in the furnace roof, is introduced into the furnace through said at least one opening as a bulk material stream, and falls onto the melt merely by gravity, wherein before entering the furnace after the downpipe the bulk material stream is passed through an adjustable dosing orifice to control a material flow rate so as to maintain at least a portion of the downpipe filled with the bulk material so that the bulk material stream enters the furnace essentially undisturbed, so that the bulk material stream is not substantially enlarged during the fall onto the melt.

23. The method as recited in claim 22 , wherein the adjustable dosing orifice is round or oval.

24. The method as claimed in claim 22 , wherein the adjustable dosing orifice is an iris.

25. The method as claimed in claim 22 , wherein the adjustable dosing orifice is inclined by not more than 25° with respect to the horizontal.

26. The method as claimed in claim 22 , wherein the adjustable dosing orifice is arranged horizontally.

Assignments (5)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 29, 2010
From: SMS DEMAG AG
To: SMS SIEMAG AG.
Reel/Frame 025220/0329 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE CITY OF THE ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 022541 FRAME 0217. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECT NAME OF THE CITY OF THE ASSIGNEE IS ESPOO. Recorded Jan 13, 2010
From: OUTOKUMPU TECHNOLOGY OYJ
To: OUTOTEC OYJ
Reel/Frame 023772/0058 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 14, 2009
From: OUTOKUMPU TECHNOLOGY OY
To: OUTOKUMPU TECHNOLOGY OYJ
Reel/Frame 022540/0988 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 14, 2009
From: OUTOKUMPU TECHNOLOGY OYJ
To: OUTOTEC OYJ
Reel/Frame 022541/0217 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 14, 2006
From: EICHBERGER, HEINZ; SCHNEIDER, KARL-JOSEF
To: OUTOKUMPU TECHNOLOGY OY; SMS DEMAG AG
Reel/Frame 017934/0496 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 103 33 764 · Jul 23, 2003 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20070082312A1 · Apr 12, 2007