IP Library Granted Patent US 8,440,610
Granted Patent B2
US 8,440,610 · App. 11/789,239 · Granted May 14, 2013

Mapkap kinase-2 as a specific target for blocking proliferation of P53-defective cells

Inventors: Michael B. Yaffe (West Roxbury, MA); Isaac A. Manke (New York, NY); Hans Christian Reinhardt (Cambridge, MA)
Assignee: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,440,610
App. No.
11/789,239
Granted
May 14, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention relates to compounds and pharmaceutical compositions for treating cellular proliferative disorders, e.g., in patients having one or more p53-deficient cells, screening assays for identifying such compounds, and methods for treating such disorders.

Claims (14)

1. A method for treating a cellular proliferative disorder in a patient having a p53-deficient cell, said method comprising administering to the patient a peptide comprising the amino acid sequence LQRQLSI (SEQ ID NO: 16), wherein the peptide comprises no more than 50 amino acids, and wherein the peptide is capable of inhibiting an activity of a MAPKAP kinase-2 polypeptide.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said patient has a tumor, and wherein said peptide is administered to said tumor.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein said peptide is administered to said tumor by direct injection.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein said administration results in a reduction in size of said tumor, in comparison to a control patient to whom said peptide is not administered.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said administering induces increased sensitivity of said p53-deficient cell to a chemotherapeutic agent, in comparison to a p53-deficient control cell in a control patient to whom said peptide is not administered.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein said chemotherapeutic agent is selected from the group consisting of alemtuzumab, altretamine, aminoglutethimide, amsacrine, anastrozole, azacitidine, bleomycin, bicalutamide, busulfan, capecitabine, carboplatin, carmustine, celecoxib, chlorambucil, 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine, cisplatin, colchicine, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, cytoxan, dacarbazine, dactinomycin, daunorubicin, docetaxel, doxorubicin, epirubicin, estramustine phosphate, etodolac, etoposide, exemestane, floxuridine, fludarabine, 5-fluorouracil, flutamide, formestane, gemcitabine, gentuzumab, goserelin, hexamethylmelamine, hydroxyurea, hypericin, ifosfamide, imatinib, interferon, irinotecan, letrozole, leuporelin, lomustine, mechlorethamine, melphalen, mercaptopurine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, mitomycin, mitotane, mitoxantrone, nilutamide, nocodazole, paclitaxel, pentostatin, procarbazine, raltitrexed, rituximab, rofecoxib, streptozocin, tamoxifen, temozolomide, teniposide, 6-thioguanine, topotecan, toremofine, trastuzumab, vinblastine, vincristine, vindesine, and vinorelbine.

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein said administering alters a DNA damage-responsive cell cycle checkpoint of said p53-deficient cell in comparison to said control cell.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein said DNA damage-responsive cell cycle checkpoint is G 1 /S phase arrest.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein Cdc25a degradation in a p53-deficient cell is impaired in comparison to a p53-deficient control cell in a control patient.

10. The method of claim 7 , wherein said DNA damage-responsive cell cycle checkpoint is G 2 /M phase arrest.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the interaction between Cdc25b and a 14-3-3 protein is reduced in comparison to a p53-deficient control cell in a control patient.

12. The method of claim 7 , wherein said cell cycle checkpoint alteration induces cell death.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein said cell death is by apoptosis.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein said apoptosis is at least partially dependent on caspase-3 activation.

Assignments (4)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Aug 12, 2015
From: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 036333/0815 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Jul 29, 2010
From: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 024763/0796 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 25, 2007
From: MANKE, ISAAC A.
To: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 020016/0060 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 20, 2007
From: YAFFE, MICHAEL B.; REINHARDT, HANS CHRISTIAN
To: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 019855/0637 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation In Part 11273567 · Nov 14, 2005
Provisional Application 60627352 · Nov 12, 2004
Provisional Application 60794451 · Apr 24, 2006
Provisional Application 60800298 · May 12, 2006
Provisional Application 60873904 · Dec 8, 2006
Related Publication 20090010927A1 · Jan 8, 2009