System and method to measure and manage urgent care requests

1. A method, for execution on a computing device, comprising:

accessing, by a computing device, clinical data and medical claims data relating to care for a group of patients;

by a computing device, establishing relationships between patients and providers, said patients being on a list of eligible patients and said providers being in a directory of providers, including attributing a patient to a provider in accordance with at least one of the medical claims data and a predetermined rule, wherein said step of establishing relationships includes:

determining from the medical claims data whether a patient may be attributed to one provider only, to a plurality of providers, or to no provider;

where the patient may be attributed to one provider only, attributing the patient to that provider, requesting confirmation of a patient-to-provider (P2P) relationship from the provider, and receiving communication from the provider regarding acceptance of the P2P relationship,

where the patient may be attributed to a plurality of providers, attributing the patient to each of said plurality of providers, requesting confirmation of a P2P relationship from each of said plurality of providers, and receiving communication from at least of said plurality of providers regarding acceptance of the P2P relationship, and where the patient may be attributed to no provider, attributing the patient to a provider in the directory of providers in accordance with a first rule;

requesting confirmation from said provider regarding a patient-provider relationship with said patient; and

recording clinical events related to an urgent care request, said events including an initial communication requesting care, and fulfillment of the request; and

by a computing device, measuring performance of the provider of said care with respect to at least one predetermined criterion.

2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the claims data, the patient eligibility list, and the provider directory are maintained by a payer entity.

3. A method according to claim 2 , wherein said determining is performed in accordance with treatment codes associated with care delivered to the patient by a given provider.

4. A method according to claim 3 , wherein said determining is performed in accordance with evaluation and management (E&M) codes associated with care delivered to the patient by a given primary care provider.

5. A method according to claim 2 , further including

where provider communication indicates acceptance of a P2P relationship with a patient by a plurality of providers,

performing a reconciliation process to attribute the patient to one of said plurality of providers; and

where provider communication indicates acceptance of a P2P relationship with a patient by no providers,

attributing the patient to a provider in the director of providers in accordance with a second rule,

wherein the first rule and the second rule are determined by the payer entity.

6. A method according to claim 5 , wherein said reconciliation process further includes

requesting further communication regarding the P2P relationship from at least one of

a provider in the directory of providers,

a committee of predetermined membership,

a representative of the payer entity, and

the patient,

wherein said reconciliation process is performed according to user-configurable rules.

7. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising

providing a user interface for performing said requesting and said recording; and

displaying information regarding said relationships and results of said measuring via said user interface.

8. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said recording step further includes

recording triage of the request,

recording assessment of the request, said assessment including a working diagnosis, and

recording assignment of the request to a provider responsible for delivering said care.

9. A method according to claim 8 , further comprising

displaying a status of a pending urgent care request;

displaying a list of requests awaiting at least one of assessment and assignment, the list including an elapsed time since recording of the initial communication requesting care.

10. A method according to claim 9 , further comprising

displaying a list of requests indicating that

a hospital discharge is pending, wherein a patient has been admitted to a hospital, or

a hospital discharge has occurred, wherein a patient has been discharged from a hospital.

11. A method according to claim 8 , wherein a pending urgent care request is characterized as an open ticket, the ticket being opened on recording of the initial communication requesting care and closed on recording of fulfillment of the request.

12. A method according to claim 1 , wherein fulfillment of the request is recorded in accordance with one of

delivery of care by a provider in the directory of providers, said delivery being documented via a user interface, and

delivery of care by a provider not in the directory of providers, said delivery being documented on the basis of the medical claims data.

13. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said measuring step further includes

determining a formula for measuring performance with respect to the criterion;

calculating a baseline performance in accordance with said formula;

calculating a performance result in accordance with said formula;

calculating a change in performance with respect to said baseline performance; and

displaying a report including at least one of the performance result and the change in performance.

14. A method according to claim 13 , wherein performance of a plurality of providers is measured, and said report includes a range of performance results.

15. A method according to claim 14 , wherein

an improvement in performance is characterized as a change in an average value of said performance results, and

said improvement is measured with respect to a range of improvement, the range of improvement having a low level corresponding to the lowest value of the performance results, and a high level corresponding to one of

the highest value of the performance results and

a value in accordance with published best practices.

16. A method according to claim 13 , further comprising:

identifying a high-risk patient in accordance with the patient's expected need for care; and

determining an action for performance by a provider having a P2P relationship with said high-risk patient,

and wherein said measuring step further includes measuring performance of said provider with respect to said action.

17. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

accessing cost data relating to a health care program;

determining, in accordance with said cost data, a net cost savings for the program over a predetermined period of time;

calculating shares of said net cost savings at least partially in accordance with said performance; and

distributing a share of said net cost savings to the provider.

18. A method according to claim 17 , further comprising:

determining an improvement in performance from a comparison of said performance with one of

a baseline performance and

a performance during a specified previous time period,

and wherein said calculating step further includes

calculating a relative weight of said performance and said improvement; and

calculating the shares in accordance with said performance, said improvement, and the relative weight.

19. A method according to claim 17 , further comprising:

where a given provider belongs to a group of providers, measuring performance of the individual provider and of the group,

and wherein said calculating step further includes

calculating a relative weight of individual performance and group performance; and

calculating the shares in accordance with the individual performance, the group performance, and the relative weight.

20. A method according to claim 17 , wherein said calculating step further includes

determining a patient panel weight factor for the provider in accordance with a number of patient months for the provider; and

calculating the shares in accordance with the patient panel weight factor.

21. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

formulating a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) quality improvement cycle for a provider; and

tracking the performance of the provider with reference to the PDSA quality improvement cycle.

22. A method according to claim 21 , further comprising:

tracking effectiveness of specific interventions regarding patient care; and

presenting information regarding said tracking to users of the method as peer-recommendations and/or benchmarks.

23. A method according to claim 22 , further comprising

displaying information regarding recommended performance improvements and/or treatment protocols.

24. A method according to claim 21 , wherein said tracking includes tracking performance of a plurality of providers, and further comprising

presenting peer-to-peer comparisons of performance.

25. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said method is performed using web-based software delivered to users' computing devices via a network.

26. A method according to claim 25 , wherein said software is configured as a plurality of modules.

27. A method according to claim 25 , wherein said software is configured for access by a user's mobile computing device.