IP Library Granted Patent US 8,571,714
Granted Patent B2
US 8,571,714 · App. 12/709,814 · Granted Oct 29, 2013

Robot with automatic selection of task-specific representations for imitation learning

Inventors: Michael Gienger (Muhlheim, DE); Manuel Muehlig (Gera, DE); Jochen Steil (Bielefeld, DE)
Assignee: Honda Research Institute Europe GmbH
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,571,714
App. No.
12/709,814
Granted
Oct 29, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention proposes a method for imitation-learning of movements of a robot, wherein the robot performs the following steps: observing a movement of an entity in the robot's environment, recording the observed movement using a sensorial data stream and representing the recorded movement in a different task space representations, selecting a subset of the task space representations for the imitation learning and reproduction of the movement to be imitated.

Claims (15)

1. A method for imitation-learning of movements of a robot, the method comprising:

observing a movement of an entity in the robot's environment,

recording the observed movement using a sensorial data stream and representing the recorded movement in a plurality of task space representations,

automatically selecting, based on cues extracted from the sensorial data stream, a subset of the plurality of task space representations for the imitation learning and reproduction of the movement to be imitated, the subset comprising at least one task space representation or a sequence of different task space representations for the reproduction of the movement wherein the step of selecting a subset of the task space representations uses cues which the robot extracts from the sensorial data stream.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of selecting a subset of the task space representations uses a variance over multiple demonstrations of the movement, wherein task space representations in which the observations have a lowest variance are chosen.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of selecting a subset of the task space representations uses explicit attention generation by a human teacher.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of selecting a subset of the task space representations uses a kinematic or dynamic simulation of a human teacher.

5. The method according to claim 4 , wherein task elements for the selection step are defined through discomfort of the human teacher and effort, of the human teacher during the task demonstration,

wherein the discomfort of the human teacher includes deviation from a default posture of the human teacher, and the effort of the human teacher is based on a torque of effector joint.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the task space selection influences the movement reproduction process on the robot.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein an optimization method is applied on the different task space representations in order to efficiently reproduce the movement.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein different task space representations are used sequentially over time when reproducing a learned movement.

9. A non-transitory computer readable medium for storing instructions, which, when run on a computing device of a robot, execute the method according to claim 1 .

10. A robot, preferably a humanoid robot, having a computing unit designed to perform a method according to claim 1 .

11. The robot of claim 10 , wherein the robot is an industrial robot, which learns certain sequences of working steps by imitation learning.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 22, 2010
From: GIENGER, MICHAEL; MUEHLIG, MANUEL; STEIL, JOCHEN
To: HONDA RESEARCH INSTITUTE EUROPE GMBH
Reel/Frame 023972/0876 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 09153866 · Feb 27, 2009 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20100222924A1 · Sep 2, 2010