IP Library › Granted Patent US 8,625,605
Granted Patent B2
US 8,625,605 · App. 13/112,257 · Granted Jan 7, 2014

Non-uniform per-packet priority marker for use with adaptive protocols

Inventors: Frank Kastenholtz (Medford, MA); Laura Jane Poplawski Ma (Somerville, MA); Walter Clark Milliken (Dover, NH); Gregory Donald Troxel (Stow, MA)
Assignee: Raytheon BBN Technologies Corp.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,625,605
App. No.
13/112,257
Granted
Jan 7, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method, apparatus and computer program product for non-uniform per-packet priority marking for use with adaptive protocols is presented. A packet is received at a first network device, the packet assigned to a priority band. A priority is determined for the packet between a lowest priority of the priority band and a highest priority of the priority band, the priority for the packet selected based on a target distribution of priorities within the priority band, the target distribution comprising a distribution selected to achieve a desired capacity relationship among groups of packets assigned to different priority bands. The selected priority is assigned to the packet.

Claims (37)

1. A method comprising:

receiving, at a first network device, a packet in a first flow of a plurality of flows, said packet being assigned to a priority band, said priority band including a lowest priority and a highest priority;

selecting a target distribution of priorities within said first flow to achieve a desired capacity relationship across said plurality of flows;

selecting, for said packet in said first flow, a priority between said lowest priority and said highest priority of said priority band based on said target distribution of priorities within said first flow; and

assigning said selected priority to said packet.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said target distribution is selected to approximate a linear relationship between a priority band and capacity share.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein said target distribution comprises a non-uniform distribution.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said target distribution is based on a reaction rate of a protocol used for transporting said packet.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein said protocol comprises a protocol that adapts to congestion.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein a number of packets at said lowest priority of said priority band is inverse-exponentially proportionate to a number of packets at said highest priority of said priority band.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprising using a prioritization mechanism to determine, based on the assigned priority of said packet, whether to drop said packet.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein said prioritization mechanism comprises a Precedence Drop Quality of Service (PDQoS).

9. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium having computer readable code thereon for non-uniform per-packet priority marking for use with adaptive protocols, the medium including instructions in which a computer system performs operations comprising:

receiving, at a first network device, a packet in a first flow of a plurality of flows, said packet being assigned to a priority band, said priority band including a lowest priority and a highest priority;

selecting a target distribution of priorities within said first flow to achieve a desired capacity relationship across said plurality of flows;

selecting, for said packet in said first flow, a priority between said lowest priority and said highest priority of said priority band based on said target distribution of priorities within said first flow; and

assigning said selected priority to said packet.

10. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 9 wherein said target distribution is selected to approximate a linear relationship between a priority band and capacity share.

11. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 9 wherein said target distribution comprises a non-uniform distribution.

12. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 9 wherein said target distribution is based on a reaction rate of a protocol used for transporting said packet.

13. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 12 wherein said protocol comprises a protocol that adapts to congestion.

14. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 9 wherein a number of packets at said lowest priority of said priority band is inverse-exponentially proportionate to a number of packets at said highest priority of said priority band.

15. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 9 further comprising using a prioritization mechanism to determine, based on the assigned priority of said packet, whether to drop said packet.

16. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 15 wherein said prioritization mechanism comprises a Precedence Drop Quality of Service (PDQoS).

17. A computer system comprising:

a memory;

a processor;

a communications interface; and

an interconnection mechanism coupling the memory, the processor and the communications interface,

wherein the memory is encoded with an application providing non-uniform per-packet priority marking for use with adaptive protocols that, when performed on the processor, provides a process for processing information, the process causing the computer system to perform the operations of:

receiving, at a first network device, a packet in a first flow of a plurality of flows, said packet being assigned to a priority band, said priority band including a lowest priority and a highest priority;

selecting a target distribution of priorities within said first flow to achieve a desired capacity relationship across said plurality of flows;

selecting, for said packet in said first flow, a priority between said lowest priority and said highest priority of said priority band based on said target distribution of priorities within said first flow; and

assigning said selected priority to said packet.

18. The computer system of claim 17 wherein said target distribution is selected to approximate a linear relationship between a priority band and capacity share.

19. The computer system of claim 17 wherein a number of packets at said lowest priority of said priority band is inverse-exponentially proportionate to a number of packets at said highest priority of said priority band.

20. The computer system of claim 17 further comprising using a prioritization mechanism to determine, based on the assigned priority of said packet, whether to drop said packet.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 22, 2024
From: RAYTHEON BBN TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
To: RTX BBN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 068748/0419 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 20, 2011
From: KASTENHOLTZ, FRANK; POPLAWSKI MA, LAURA JANE; MILLIKEN, WALTER CLARK; TROXEL, GREGORY DONALD
To: RAYTHEON BBN TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Reel/Frame 026314/0924 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation In Part 12200264 · Aug 28, 2008
Related Publication 20120176903A1 · Jul 12, 2012