IP Library Granted Patent US 8,689,346
Granted Patent B2
US 8,689,346 · App. 11/569,974 · Granted Apr 1, 2014

Authentication method for authenticating a first party to a second party

Inventors: Maurice Jerome Justin Jean-Baptiste Maes (Eindhoven, NL); Boris Skoric (Eindhoven, NL); Antonius Adriaan Maria Staring (Eindhoven, NL); Johan Cornelis Talstra (Eindhoven, NL)
Assignee: Koninklijke Philips N.V.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,689,346
App. No.
11/569,974
Granted
Apr 1, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

An authentication system and method is presented for authenticating a first party to a second party, where an operation is performed on condition that the authentication succeeds. The authentication method verifies whether the first party is authenticated. If the first party is not authenticated, then it is determined if the first party qualifies for a sub-authorization. The sub-authorization depends on a value of a grace-counter associated with a number of times that first parties have been qualified for the sub-authorization. If the first party qualifies for the sub-authorization, the operation is performed and the grace counter is decremented. If the first party is authenticated, then the grace counter is set to a predetermined number.

Claims (14)

1. An authentication method for authenticating a first party to a second party, each party being one of a device and a software application, where an operation is performed on condition that the authentication succeeds, comprising the steps of:

providing at least one computer having a processor for performing the steps of:

verifying whether the first party is authenticated or not by determining whether a compliance certificate of the first party is out of date or not, based on a comparison measure of the second party, wherein the comparison measure comprises a range of allowed validity numbers, and wherein the comparison measure compares a date of issuance measure of the compliance certificate with the comparison measure of the second party, wherein said first party is authenticated only if it is determined by the comparison that the date of issuance measure is not out of date;

if the first party is determined to be not authenticated based on said verification, then conditionally qualifying the first party for a sub-authorization, dependent on a comparison of the date of issuance measure of the compliance certificate of the first party with the range of allowed validity numbers, wherein said conditional qualification of the first party for the sub-authorization is not allowed if it is determined that the date of issuance measure of the compliance certificate of the first party is lower than a minimum validity number of said range of allowed validity numbers indicating that the compliance certificate of the first party is revoked, and wherein said conditional qualification of the first party for the sub-authorization is allowed if it is determined that the date of issuance measure of the compliance certificate is higher than or equal to a maximum validity number of said range of allowed validity numbers;

if the compliance certificate of the first party is determined not to be revoked, a pre-set value of a grace-counter is used for controlling a number of times that the first party is being sub-authorized,

wherein, if the first party qualifies for the sub-authorization, the operation is still performed and the grace counter is decremented from an initialized predetermined number, and if the first party is authenticated, then setting the grace counter to the predetermined number.

2. The authentication method according to claim 1 , wherein said step of verifying comprises the step of: verifying if the first party is compliant according to a compliance certificate concerning the first party or not, wherein the first party is authenticated only if it is compliant.

3. The authentication method according to claim 2 , wherein said compliance certificate is a Groups Certificate.

4. The authentication method according to claim 2 wherein the second party holds a limited list of first parties, comprising the steps of: updating, at the second party, the comparison measure, and in conjunction with said updating, storing, at the second party, an updated set of compliance certificates containing compliance certificates concerning first parties on said list of first parties.

5. The authentication method according to claim 1 , wherein a maximum validity number of said range of allowed validity numbers is a current validity number stored at the second party.

6. The authentication method according to claim 1 , wherein a minimum validity number of said range of allowed validity numbers is a previous validity number stored at the second party.

7. The authentication method according to claim 1 , wherein the operation comprises accessing content.

8. The authentication method according to claim 7 , wherein said content is stored on an optical disc.

9. The authentication method according to claim 1 , wherein said first party is a software application and said second party is a device.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 6, 2024
From: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
To: MEDIA CONTENT PROTECTION LLC
Reel/Frame 068200/0378 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 30, 2024
From: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
To: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
Reel/Frame 067590/0566 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 4, 2006
From: MAES, MAURICE JEROME JUSTIN JEAN-BAPTISTE; SKORIC, BORIS; STARING, ANTONIUS ADRIAAN MARIA; TALSTRA, JOHAN CORNELIS
To: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N V
Reel/Frame 018577/0587 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 04102536 · Jun 4, 2004 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20070174898A1 · Jul 26, 2007