IP Library Granted Patent US 8,733,633
Granted Patent B2
US 8,733,633 · App. 13/288,159 · Granted May 27, 2014

Methods and systems for validating negotiable instruments

Inventor: Michael R. Bates (Fountain Hills, AZ)
Assignee: Certegy Check Services, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,733,633
App. No.
13/288,159
Granted
May 27, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems for validating a negotiable instrument. One method can include obtaining an electronic image of the negotiable instrument, electronically determining a first value and a second value of the negotiable instrument based on the electronic image, and automatically validating the negotiable instrument if the first value is substantially equal to the second value.

Claims (29)

1. A system configured to;

obtain an electronic image of a negotiable instrument;

determine a first value and a second value of the negotiable instrument based on the electronic image;

validate the negotiable instrument when the first value is substantially equal to the second value; and

when the first value is not substantially equal to the second value:

determine whether an authorized transaction amount is available; and

when the authorized transaction amount is available, validate the negotiable instrument and set an amount of the negotiable instrument to be equal to the authorized transaction amount.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein determining whether the authorized transaction amount is available is based at least in part on at least one of an account number or a drivers license number.

3. The system of claim 1 wherein at least one of the first or second values comprises one of a courtesy amount received or a legal amount received.

4. The system of claim 3 further configured to validate the negotiable instrument when the courtesy amount received is substantially equal to the legal amount received.

5. The system of claim 4 wherein determining whether the authorized transaction amount is available further comprises determining whether the courtesy amount received is substantially equal to the legal amount received.

6. The system of claim 1 further configured to queue the negotiable instrument for manual review when the authorized transaction amount is not available.

7. The system of claim 1 wherein the negotiable instrument comprises a check.

8. The system of claim 1 wherein determining the first value and the second value of the negotiable instrument is based at least in part on optical character recognition.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the authorized transaction amount is set during a previous authorization of the negotiable instrument.

10. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions which, when executed on a processor, cause the processor to perform a method, the method comprising:

obtaining an electronic image of a negotiable instrument;

determining a first value and a second value of the negotiable instrument based on the electronic image;

validating the negotiable instrument when the first value is substantially equal to the second value; and

when the first value is not substantially equal to the second value:

determining whether an authorized transaction amount is available; and

when the authorized transaction amount is available, validating the negotiable instrument and sefting an amount of the negotiable instrument to be equal to the authorized transaction amount.

11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 wherein determining whether the authorized transaction amount is available is based at least in part on at least one of an account number or a driver's license number.

12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 wherein at least one of the first or second values comprises one of a courtesy amount received or a legal amount received.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 further comprising instructions to validate the negotiable instrument when the courtesy amount received is substantially equal to the legal amount received.

14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 wherein determining whether the authorized transaction amount is available further comprises determining whether the courtesy amount received is substantially equal to the legal amount received.

15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 further comprising instructions to queue the negotiable instrument for manual review when the authorized transaction amount is not available.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 wherein the negotiable instrument comprises a check.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 wherein determining the first value and the second value of the negotiable instrument is based at least in part on optical character recognition.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 21, 2018
From: PROJECT ROSE ACQUISITION, LLC
To: CERTEGY PAYMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 047128/0549 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 14, 2018
From: PROJECT ROSE ACQUISITION, LLC
To: WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK
Reel/Frame 046881/0224 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2018
From: CERTEGY CHECK SERVICES, INC.
To: PROJECT ROSE ACQUISITION, LLC
Reel/Frame 046827/0852 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 11520430 · Sep 13, 2006
Provisional Application 60718124 · Sep 16, 2005
Related Publication 20120045113A1 · Feb 23, 2012