IP Library › Granted Patent US 8,752,351
Granted Patent B2
US 8,752,351 · App. 14/105,913 · Granted Jun 17, 2014

Shingle with reinforced nail zone and method of manufacturing

Inventors: James S. Belt (Utica, OH); Bert W. Elliott (Toledo, OH)
Assignee: Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, LLC
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,752,351
App. No.
14/105,913
Granted
Jun 17, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A roofing shingle is provided. The roofing shingles includes an overlay sheet including a headlap portion and a tab portion and an underlay sheet secured to the overlay sheet such that a region of the underlay sheet overlaps a region of the headlap portion of the overlay sheet. A reinforcement material is secured to the headlap portion of the overlay sheet. The reinforcement material is configured to improve nail pull-through. The reinforcement material extends beyond the overlapping regions of the headlap portion and the underlay sheet a distance of about 0.12 inches or less.

Claims (47)

1. A roofing shingle comprising:

an asphalt coated overlay sheet including a headlap portion and a tab portion; an asphalt coated underlay sheet secured to the overlay sheet such that a region of the underlay sheet overlaps a region of the headlap portion of the overlay sheet; wherein the overlay sheet has a non-uniform thickness; and

a reinforcement material secured to the headlap portion of the overlay sheet, wherein the reinforcement material is configured to improve nail pull-through;

granules adhered to the asphalt coated overlay sheet and to the asphalt coated underlay sheet;

wherein the reinforcement material and the headlap portion provide a nail pull-through value that is at least 13.3 percent greater than an otherwise identical shingle having no such reinforcement material; and

wherein the weight of the shingle is less than an otherwise identical shingle having no such reinforcement material, because there are substantially no granules in a portion of the overlay sheet covered by the reinforcement material.

2. The roofing shingle of claim 1 wherein the weight of the shingle is reduced within a range of from about four percent to about six percent as compared to an otherwise identical shingle having no such reinforcement material.

3. The roofing shingle of claim 1 wherein the shingle provides an average nail pull-through value of at least 90 newtons when measured at a temperature of 23° C.+/−2° C.

4. The roofing shingle of claim 1 wherein the shingle provides an average nail pull-through value of at least 130 newtons when measured at a temperature of 23° C.+/−2° C.

5. The roofing shingle of claim 1 wherein the shingle provides an average nail pull-through value of at least 104 newtons when measured at a temperature of 23° C.+/−2° C.

6. The roofing shingle of claim 1 wherein said granules are not secured to the reinforcement material.

7. The roofing shingle of claim 1 wherein the reinforcement material is formed from a woven material.

8. The roofing shingle of claim 7 wherein the reinforcement material is formed from a polymeric material.

9. A roofing shingle comprising:

an asphalt coated overlay sheet including a headlap portion and a tab portion; an asphalt coated underlay sheet secured to the overlay sheet such that a region of the underlay sheet overlaps a region of the headlap portion of the overlay sheet;

wherein the overlay sheet has a non-uniform thickness; and

a reinforcement material secured to the headlap portion of the overlay sheet, wherein the reinforcement material is configured to improve nail pull-through;

granules adhered to the asphalt coated overlay sheet and to the asphalt coated underlay sheet;

wherein the reinforcement material and the headlap portion provide a nail pull-through value that is at least 13.3 percent greater than an otherwise identical shingle having no such reinforcement material; and

wherein portions of adjacent stacked shingles covered by the reinforcement material and having no granules cooperate such that a thickness of a central area of the stacked shingles is less than a thickness of a central area of otherwise identical stacked shingles having no such reinforcement material.

10. The roofing shingle of claim 9 wherein the shingle provides an average nail pull-through value of at least 90 newtons when measured at a temperature of 23° C.+/−2° C.

11. The roofing shingle of claim 9 wherein the shingle provides an average nail pull-through value of at least 130 newtons when measured at a temperature of 23° C.+/−2° C.

12. The roofing shingle of claim 9 wherein the shingle provides an average nail pull-through value of at least 104 newtons when measured at a temperature of 23° C.+/−2° C.

13. The roofing shingle of claim 9 wherein said granules are not secured to the reinforcement material.

14. The roofing shingle of claim 9 wherein the reinforcement material is formed from a polymeric woven material.

15. A roofing shingle comprising:

an asphalt coated overlay sheet including a headlap portion and a tab portion; an asphalt coated underlay sheet secured to the overlay sheet such that a region of the underlay sheet overlaps a region of the headlap portion of the overlay sheet; wherein the overlay sheet has a non-uniform thickness; and

a reinforcement material secured to the headlap portion of the overlay sheet, wherein the reinforcement material is configured to improve nail pull-through; granules adhered to the asphalt coated overlay sheet and to the asphalt coated underlay sheet;

wherein the weight of the shingle is less than an otherwise identical shingle having no such reinforcement material, because there are substantially no granules in a portion of the overlay sheet covered by the reinforcement material; and

wherein the portions of adjacent stacked shingles covered by the reinforcement material and having no granules cooperate such that a thickness of a central area of the stacked shingles is less than a thickness of a central area of otherwise identical stacked shingles having no such reinforcement material.

16. The roofing shingle of claim 15 wherein the shingle provides an average nail pull-through value of at least 90 newtons when measured at a temperature of 23° C.+/−2° C.

17. The roofing shingle of claim 15 wherein the shingle provides an average nail pull-through value of at least 130 newtons when measured at a temperature of 23° C.+/−2° C.

18. The roofing shingle of claim 15 wherein the shingle provides an average nail pull-through value of at least 104 newtons when measured at a temperature of 23° C.+/−2° C.

19. The roofing shingle of claim 15 wherein said granules are not secured to the reinforcement material.

20. The roofing shingle of claim 15 wherein the reinforcement material is formed from a polymeric woven material.

21. A roofing shingle comprising:

an asphalt coated overlay sheet including a headlap portion and a tab portion;

an asphalt coated underlay sheet secured to the overlay sheet such that a region of the underlay sheet overlaps a region of the headlap portion of the overlay sheet; wherein the overlay sheet has a non-uniform thickness; and

a reinforcement material secured to the headlap portion of the overlay sheet, wherein the reinforcement material is configured to improve nail pull-through;

granules adhered to the asphalt coated overlay sheet and to the asphalt coated underlay sheet;

wherein the reinforcement material and the headlap portion provide a nail pull-through value that is at least 13.3 percent greater than an otherwise identical shingle having no such reinforcement material.

22. The roofing shingle of claim 21 wherein the shingle provides an average nail pull-through value of at least 90 newtons when measured at a temperature of 23° C.+/−2° C.

23. The roofing shingle of claim 21 wherein the shingle provides an average nail pull-through value of at least 130 newtons when measured at a temperature of 23° C.+/−2° C.

24. The roofing shingle of claim 21 wherein the shingle provides an average nail pull-through value of at least 104 newtons when measured at a temperature of 23° C.+/−2° C.

25. The roofing shingle of claim 21 wherein said granules are not secured to the reinforcement material.

26. The roofing shingle of claim 21 wherein the reinforcement material is formed from a woven material.

27. The roofing shingle of claim 26 wherein the reinforcement material is formed from a polymeric material.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 17, 2014
From: BELT, JAMES S.; ELLIOTT, BERT W.
To: OWENS CORNING INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, LLC
Reel/Frame 031994/0943 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 13097810 · Apr 29, 2011
Continuation In Part 12895195 · Sep 30, 2010
Continuation 11198522 · Aug 5, 2005
Related Publication 20140102030A1 · Apr 17, 2014