IP Library › Granted Patent US 8,766,643
Granted Patent B2
US 8,766,643 · App. 12/452,116 · Granted Jul 1, 2014

Method for monitoring remaining service life of a battery

Inventors: Werner Thoren (Steinen, DE); Christian Seiler (Auggen, DE); Stefan Probst (Weil am Rhein, DE); Ingo Laible (Arlesheim, CH)
Assignee: Endress + Hauser Process Solutions AG
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,766,643
App. No.
12/452,116
Granted
Jul 1, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for monitoring the remaining service life of a battery used for operating a field device in automation technology. The present power consumption of the battery is ascertained. Then, during a first phase of life, power consumption of the battery ascertained during operation of the field device is compared with a predetermined threshold value. In the case of exceeding the predetermined threshold value, during a second phase of life, the battery is exposed to defined load spikes at predetermined time intervals. Voltage collapses corresponding to the defined load spikes are detected, and a warning report is generated when the voltage collapses reach a predetermined maximum limit value.

Claims (35)

1. A method for monitoring the remaining service life of a battery used during operation of a field device in automation technology, wherein the field device is operated in various operating states and associated with each operating state of the field device is stored a defined power consumption of the battery as a function of the arising operating states, and wherein the method uses both a consumption calculation during a first phase of life as well as an End-of-Life detection during a second phase of life, comprising the steps of:

during the first phase of life, comparing the calculated sum of the power consumptions of the arising operating states of the field device with a predetermined threshold value;

entering a second phase of life when the sum of the calculated power consumptions of the arising operating states of the field device exceeds the predetermined threshold value;

during the second phase of life, exposing the battery to defined overload spikes at predetermined time intervals;

detecting voltage collapses corresponding to the defined overload spikes; and

generating a warning report when the voltage collapses reaches a predetermined maximum limit value.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising the step of:

operating the field device intermittently between operating phases and resting phases.

3. The method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein:

power consumption of the battery or the respective battery type is stored as a function of the arising operating states or ascertained during the operating phase; and

reaching of the predetermined threshold value is signaled when the sum of the power consumptions of arising operating states reaches or exceeds the upper threshold value.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising the steps of:

ascertaining during operating of the field device, electrical current provided by the battery and integrated over time; and

ascertaining by means of the ascertained values, power consumption of the field device or remaining power capacity of the battery.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein:

during operating phases, the field device is operated in various operating states; and

a defined power consumption of the battery or a battery type is associated with each operating state of the field device.

6. The method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein:

power consumptions of the various operating states of the battery or battery type are empirically ascertained or calculated.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein:

the upper threshold value is signaled when the power capacity of the battery falls to at least half of the power capacity available to the battery in its unused state.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein:

total consumption of the battery or battery type over its lifespan is stored as a function of process conditions reigning at the location of use of the battery.

9. The method as claimed in claim 8 , wherein:

an optimized threshold value is ascertained as a function of ascertained lifespan of the battery under process conditions reigning at the location of use.

10. The method as claimed in claim 9 , wherein:

total power consumption at the end of the life of the battery is used for calculating and optimizing the threshold value for use of a following battery of the same type.

11. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein:

time intervals, in which the battery is exposed to defined overload spikes, are varied.

12. The method as claimed in claim 1 ,

size of the overload spikes is varied as a function of the power status of the battery.

13. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein:

from the difference between present power consumption and the capacity of the battery, a remaining run time for operation of the field device is determined taking into consideration each of the operating states of the field device.

14. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein:

the size of the overload spikes is varied as a function of the particular power status of the battery, so that the demand on the battery is likewise lessened.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 16, 2009
From: THOREN, WERNER; SEILER, CHRISTIAN; PROBST, STEFAN; LAIBLE, INGO
To: ENDRESS + HAUSER PROCESS SOLUTIONS AG
Reel/Frame 023702/0784 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2008 037 193 · Aug 11, 2008 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20100283472A1 · Nov 11, 2010