IP Library › Granted Patent US 8,771,826
Granted Patent B2
US 8,771,826 · App. 12/657,528 · Granted Jul 8, 2014

Mineral composition

Inventors: Robert H. Whitaker (Cleveland, GA); Richard Brann (Franklin, TN); Randall P. Downing (Monteagle, TN)
Assignee: L Hoist North America, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,771,826
App. No.
12/657,528
Granted
Jul 8, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A roofing shingle that contains a roofing granules. The roofing granules contain at least about 95 weight percent of calcium carbonate with a hardgrove grindability index of less than about 70, and from about 0.1 to about 1.0 weight percent of a pigmented material; the pigmented material contains from about 10 to about 35 weight percent of pigment and from about 90 to about 65 weight percent of a resin; and the roofing granules are coated with an amine antistrip agent.

Claims (24)

1. A shingle assembly comprised of a fiber mat and an asphaltic coating material, wherein said asphaltic coating material is comprised of asphalt, a mineral filler disposed within said asphaltic coating material, and coated roofing granules embedded within said asphaltic coating material, wherein said coated roofing granules are comprised of limestone particles that have a hardgrove grindability index of less than 70, and wherein said coated roofing granules are coated with oil.

2. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said limestone particles contain at least about 60 weight percent of calcium carbonate.

3. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said limestone particles contain at least about 70 weight percent of calcium carbonate.

4. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said limestone particles contain at least about 80 weight percent of calcium carbonate.

5. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said limestone particles contain at least about 90 weight percent of calcium carbonate.

6. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said asphaltic coating material is comprised of at least about 65 weight percent of said mineral filler.

7. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 6 , wherein said mineral filler is limestone filler.

8. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said coated roofing granules are comprised of limestone particles with a hardgrove grindability index of less than about 68.

9. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said coated roofing granules are comprised of limestone particles with a hardgrove grindability index of less than about 60.

10. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said coated roofing granules are comprised of limestone particles with a hardgrove grindability index of from about 55 to about 58.

11. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said coated roofing granules are comprised of particles of dolomitic limestone.

12. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said oil is naphthenic mineral oil.

13. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said oil is a hydrocarbon oil.

14. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said coated roofing granules are comprised of a coating that has a thickness of from about 200 to about 2000 nanometers.

15. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said coated roofing granules are comprised of a coating that has a thickness of from about 300 to about 1200 nanometers.

16. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said coated roofing granules are comprised of from about 0.0025 to about 0.0005 gallons of said oil for each pound of said limestone particles.

17. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said coated roofing granules have a hydrophobicity of less than 3.0 percent.

18. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said coated roofing granules have a hydrophobicity of less than 2.5 percent.

19. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said coated roofing granules have a hydrophobicity of less than 2.0 percent.

20. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said coated roofing granules have a hydrophobicity of less than 1.5 percent.

21. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said coated roofing granules have a Moh's hardness of from about 2.5 to about 3.5.

22. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said coated roofing granules have a Moh's hardness of from about 2.9 to about 3.1.

23. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said coated roofing granules have a pH of from about 8 to about 11.

24. The shingle assembly as recited in claim 1 , wherein said coated roofing granules have a pH of from about 9 to about 11.

Continuity (4)
Continuation In Part 11999205 · Dec 4, 2007
Continuation In Part 11638618 · Dec 13, 2006
Continuation In Part 11266833 · Nov 4, 2005
Related Publication 20100203290A1 · Aug 12, 2010