IP Library Granted Patent US 8,792,594
Granted Patent B2
US 8,792,594 · App. 14/019,289 · Granted Jul 29, 2014

Systems and methods for advanced iterative decoding and channel estimation of concatenated coding systems

Inventors: Branimir R Vojcic (Vienna, CA); Hakan Dogan (Arnavutkoy, TR)
Assignee: Digital PowerRadio, LLC
G06F11/1625H04L1/005
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,792,594
App. No.
14/019,289
Granted
Jul 29, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for decoding block and concatenated codes are provided, including channel state information estimation such as by using optimum filter lengths based on channel selectivity and adaptive decision-directed channel estimation. These improvements enhance the performance of various communication systems and consumer electronics, including HD Radio receivers and systems.

Claims (23)

1. A method for iterative channel response estimation in a receiver of a multicarrier communication system that relies on forward-error-correction decoding, the method comprising:

selecting filter lengths for time and frequency domain channel estimation based on estimated time selectivity and frequency selectivity of said channel response, wherein said time selectivity and frequency selectivity are estimated using at least one of known pilot symbols and unknown data symbols;

estimating, by an estimator, said channel response using said selected filter lengths by using available pilot symbols and a first set of data symbols, the first set of data symbols being selected as a fraction of data symbols that are more reliable than a remaining fraction of data symbols in a second set of data symbols;

with respect to symbol positions corresponding to said second set of data symbols, estimating the channel response by interpolation based on estimated values of channel response obtained from said pilot symbols and said first set of data symbols;

performing, by a decoder, forward-error-correction decoding using said channel response estimate to obtain improved estimates of coded bits;

obtaining improved estimates of data symbols using said improved estimates of coded bits;

calculating, by said estimator, an updated channel response estimate using a shorter filter length for at least one filter and a larger fraction of more reliable data symbols;

repeating the steps of performing forward-error-correction decoding and obtaining estimates of data symbols based on said updated channel response estimate, and calculating further updated channel response estimates based on improved estimates of data symbols; and

estimating noise power using the following steps:

estimating noise samples on positions of said known pilot symbols by subtracting from received noisy symbol samples a product of the corresponding estimated channel response and the pilot symbol values;

estimating noise samples on positions of said first set of data symbols by subtracting from the received noisy symbol samples a product of the corresponding estimated channel response and estimated values of the first set of data symbols;

estimating a power of said estimated noise samples associated with the positions of said first set of data symbols by either calculating a squared magnitude of said estimated noise samples associated with the positions of said first set of data symbols, or by squaring real and imaginary parts of said estimated noise samples associated with the positions of said first set of data symbols; and

filtering said estimated power over time with a first filter length and over frequency with a second filter length.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one of said time and frequency selectivity is estimated using a level crossing rate estimate of said channel response.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one of said time and frequency selectivity is estimated using a rate of change estimate of said channel response.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said selected filter lengths are used to smooth said channel response.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein said selected filter lengths are different for time and frequency domain processing.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein a criterion for selecting said fraction of more reliable data symbols is based on at least one of the following:

the channel response at a given symbol position is larger than a first threshold; and

a signal-to-noise ratio or a signal-to-noise plus interference ratio at a given symbol position is larger than a second threshold.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein at least one of said first and second thresholds is selected based on said estimated channel response time selectivity or frequency selectivity.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein said first filter length is selected according to time selectivity of noise or interference and where said second filter length is selected according to frequency selectivity of noise or interference.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein said calculating of further updated channel response estimates is based on one or both of further decreasing the filter length and further increasing the fraction of data symbols.

Continuity (2)
Continuation 13693023 · Dec 3, 2012
Related Publication 20140153628A1 · Jun 5, 2014