IP Library › Granted Patent US 8,896,433
Granted Patent B2
US 8,896,433 · App. 12/864,335 · Granted Nov 25, 2014

Driver assistance system and method for supporting the driver of a vehicle in maintaining a traffic lane limited by traffic lane markings

Inventors: Bernd Danner (Aichtal, DE); Uli Kolbe (Stuttgart, DE); Rainer Moebus (Stuttgart, DE); Markus Raab (Kirchhardt, DE); Uwe Regensburger (Ostfildern, DE); Reinhold Schoeb (Gaeufelden, DE); Ingo Dudeck (Weinstadt, DE)
Assignee: Daimler AG
B62D15/025B60T8/17557B62D15/0265B60T2201/08B60T2201/082B60T2201/083
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,896,433
App. No.
12/864,335
Granted
Nov 25, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

In a method and apparatus for assisting the driver of a vehicle in maintaining a traffic lane limited by traffic lane markings, the traffic lane markings and the position of the vehicle in the traffic lane are detected. Upon an actual or impending change of traffic lanes a lane change warning is output to the driver of the vehicle in a first step, and a course correcting actuating intervention counteracting the lane change is carried out in a second step. The actuating intervention is carried out only if the change of traffic lanes is impermissible due to the type of traffic lane marking to be crossed during the traffic lane change, or if the lane change is not possible without danger due to collision-endangering objects present on the side of the traffic lane.

Claims (37)

1. A driver assistance system for a vehicle, said system comprising:

a traffic lane recognition device for detecting a traffic lane driven on by a vehicle, based on lane-limiting traffic lane markings, wherein the traffic lane recognition device is configured to recognize, based on a type of the traffic lane markings, whether an abandonment of the traffic lane by passing over the particular traffic lane marking is permissible or impermissible;

a warning device for outputting a lane abandoning warning to a driver of the vehicle when a lane abandoning tendency is detected;

an object recognition device for detecting lateral objects that are present next to the sensed traffic lane and front objects present forward of the vehicle; and

a control device for carrying out a course correcting actuating intervention; wherein,

the control device is configured to trigger the actuating intervention subsequent to the output of the lane abandoning warning;

the control device determines whether to trigger the actuating intervention based on whether (1) an abandoning of the traffic lane is impermissible, (2) a danger of a collision with a detected lateral object exists, and (3) a danger of a collision with a detected front object exists;

the actuating intervention is triggered chronologically after the output of the lane abandonment warning when (a) abandoning of the traffic lane is impermissible, (b) the danger of a collision with a detected front object does not exist, and (c) the danger of a collision with a detected lateral object does not exist;

the actuating intervention is triggered chronologically after the output of the lane abandonment warning when abandoning of the traffic lane is permissible and the danger of a collision with a detected lateral object exists;

the actuating intervention is suppressed chronologically after the output of the lane abandonment warning when abandoning of the traffic lane is impermissible and the danger of a collision with a detected front object exists;

the actuating intervention is suppressed chronologically after the output of the lane abandonment warning when abandoning of the traffic lane is permissible and (1) the danger of a collision with a detected front object does not exist and (2) the danger of collision with a detected lateral object does not exist;

the traffic lane recognition device is configured to judge an abandoning of the traffic lane as permissible if the traffic lane marking that will be passed over is a broken line, and to judge it as impermissible if the traffic lane marking that will be passed over is a continuous line; and

the danger of collision with a detected front or lateral object exists when there is a probability that the vehicle will collide with the detected front or lateral object within an anticipatory period if the vehicle continues along its current course and no countermeasures are performed.

2. The driver assistance system according to claim 1 , wherein the control device is configured to carry out the actuating intervention by individual braking of single wheels of the vehicle.

3. The driver assistance system according to claim 1 , wherein the warning device is configured to output the lane abandoning warning in the form of steering wheel vibrations to the driver.

4. The driver assistance system according to claim 1 , wherein the object recognition device is configured to recognize standing and moving objects outside and inside the traffic lane.

5. The driver assistance system according to claim 1 , wherein the control device is configured to suppress actuating intervention with a permissible abandoning of the traffic lane, if an area is present that is sufficiently large for a lane change.

6. The driver assistance system according to claim 1 , wherein the traffic lane recognition device is designed as a video-based lane recognition system.

7. The driver assistance system according to claim 1 , wherein the object recognition device is designed as a radar system.

8. A method for assisting the driver of a vehicle in maintaining a traffic lane that is limited by traffic lane markings, said method comprising:

detecting the traffic lane markings and the position of the vehicle within the traffic lane;

determining, based on the detected traffic lane markings and the position of the vehicle whether the traffic lane is being abandoned or about to be abandoned;

sensing the environment of the vehicle for presence of collision-endangering objects next to the traffic lane and in front of the vehicle in the traffic lane;

outputting, in a first escalation step, a lane abandonment warning to a vehicle operator when it is determined that the traffic lane is being abandoned or about to be abandoned;

determining whether the abandoning of the traffic lane is permissible or impermissible based on the type of traffic lane marking that is to be crossed over;

determining whether to trigger or suppress a course correcting actuating intervention as a second escalation step, which is performed chronologically after the output of the lane abandonment warning, based on whether (1) the abandoning of the traffic lane has been determined to be permissible, (2) no collision-endangering objects are present next to the traffic lane, and (3) no collision endangering objects are present in front of the vehicle in the traffic lane,

wherein the course correcting actuating intervention is triggered chronologically after the output of the lane abandonment warning when (a) abandoning of the traffic lane is impermissible, (b) no collision-endangering objects are in front of the vehicle in the traffic lane, and (c) no collision-endangering objects are present next to the traffic lane,

wherein the course correcting actuating intervention is triggered chronologically after the output of the lane abandonment warning when abandoning of the traffic lane is permissible and a collision endangering object is present next to the traffic lane,

wherein the course correcting actuating intervention is suppressed chronologically after the output of the lane abandonment warning when abandoning of the traffic lane is impermissible and a collision endangering object is present in front of the vehicle in the traffic lane,

wherein the course correcting actuating intervention is suppressed chronologically after the output of the lane abandonment warning when abandoning of the traffic lane is permissible and (1) no collision endangering objects are present in front of the vehicle in the traffic lane and (2) no collision endangering objects are present next to the traffic lane,

wherein abandonment of the traffic lane is judged to be permissible if the traffic lane marking that will be passed over when abandoning the lane is a broken line, and abandonment of the traffic lane is judged as impermissible if the traffic lane marking that will be passed over is a continuous line, and

wherein a collision endangering-object that next to the traffic lane or in front of the vehicle in the traffic lane is an object for which there is a probability that the vehicle will collide with the object next to the traffic lane or in front of the vehicle in the traffic lane within an anticipatory period if the vehicle continues along its current course and no countermeasures are performed.

9. The method according to claim 8 , wherein:

the magnitude of the danger that a collision of the vehicle with one of the collision-endangering objects is estimated; and

the actuating intervention is carried out depending on the estimated magnitude of the danger.

10. The method according to claim 8 , wherein the lane abandoning warning is output as a haptic warning.

11. The method according to claim 8 , wherein the course correcting actuating intervention is carried out as a single wheel brake intervention.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 29, 2025
From: DAIMLER AG
To: MERCEDES BENZ GROUP AG
Reel/Frame 072886/0467 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 1, 2010
From: DANNER, BERND; KOLBE, ULI; MOEBUS, RAINER; RAAB, MARKUS; REGENSBURGER, UWE; SCHOEB, REINHOLD; DUDECK, ANKE DORLE, HEIR; DUDECK, LARS, HEIR; DUDECK, SVEN GERHARD, HEIR
To: DAIMLER AG
Reel/Frame 025416/0196 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2008 005 999 · Jan 25, 2008 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20110234390A1 · Sep 29, 2011