IP Library › Granted Patent US 8,914,671
Granted Patent B2
US 8,914,671 · App. 13/783,428 · Granted Dec 16, 2014

Multiple hyperswap replication sessions

Inventors: William J. Rooney (Hopewell Junction, NY); Peter G. Sutton (Lagrangeville, NY)
Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
G06F11/2092G06F11/2094
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,914,671
App. No.
13/783,428
Granted
Dec 16, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes monitoring a plurality of HyperSwap sessions between one or more storage systems located at a first location and one or more storage systems located at a second location, wherein at least one of the one or more storage systems located at the first location and at the second location are designated as a primary storage system. The method includes detecting an error event and freezing communications between the storage systems located at the first location and the second location in response to the error event. The method also includes designating either the first location or the second location as a preferred location and modifying the designation of all of storage systems at the preferred location to be primary storage systems in response to the error event.

Claims (11)

1. A method comprising:

monitoring a plurality of HyperSwap sessions between one or more storage systems located at a first location and one or more storage systems located at a second location, wherein at least one of the one or more storage systems located at the first location and at the second location are designated as a primary storage system, wherein at least one of the one or more storage systems located at the first location and at the second location are designated as a secondary storage system, and wherein either the first location or the second location are designated as a preferred location;

detecting an error event;

freezing communications between the one or more storage systems located at the first location and the one or more storage systems located at the second location in response to the error event; and

modifying the designation of all of the one or more storage systems at the preferred location to be primary storage systems in response to the error event.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein designating either the first location or the second location as a preferred location is performed by a user.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein designating either the first location or the second location as a preferred location is performed autonomously.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the primary storage systems are synchronized with a corresponding secondary storage system prior to the detection of the error event.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the designation of either the first location or the second location as the preferred location is performed responsive to detecting an error at the first location or the second location.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein each storage system includes a plurality of volumes and wherein the designation of either the first location or the second location as the preferred location is based upon which location has a greater number of operational primary volumes.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the error event is a failure of a communications link between the one or more storage systems located at the first location and the one or more storage systems located at the second location.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 4, 2013
From: ROONEY, WILLIAM J.; SUTTON, PETER G.
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 029911/0843 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 13547564 · Jul 12, 2012
Related Publication 20140019802A1 · Jan 16, 2014