IP Library › Granted Patent US 8,972,707
Granted Patent B2
US 8,972,707 · App. 13/299,239 · Granted Mar 3, 2015

Multi-core processor with core selectively disabled by kill instruction of system software and resettable only via external pin

Inventors: G. Glenn Henry (Austin, TX); Stephan Gaskins (Austin, TX)
Assignee: VIA Technologies, Inc.
G06F1/3287G06F1/24G06F9/30076G06F9/30083G06F11/3664G06F9/5094G06F11/1423
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,972,707
App. No.
13/299,239
Granted
Mar 3, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

Dynamically reconfigurable multi-core microprocessors and associated methods are provided. A multi-core microprocessor is provided that supports the ability of system software to disable, or kill, selected cores in such a way that they do not cause drag on the processor bus shared with the other cores. Another multi-core microprocessor is provided that supports reconfiguration of an inter-core coordination system of the microprocessor, wherein cores may be selectively designated as masters for purposes of driving signals onto an inter-core communication wire.

Claims (24)

1. A dynamically reconfigurable multi-core microprocessor comprising:

a plurality of initially enabled processing cores;

each initially enabled core being configured to execute a kill instruction issued by system software by disabling the core from responding to transactions on a system bus externally coupled to the multi-core microprocessor, thereby disabling the core;

wherein a kill-instruction-disabled core is disabled from complying with a reset message instruction sent over the system bus, but remains operable to be revived by an external reset on a reset pin of the multi-core microprocessor, and, if so reset, to resume operability as an enabled processing core unless and until it receives another kill instruction.

2. The dynamically reconfigurable multi-core microprocessor of claim 1 , wherein as a result of being unresponsive to system bus transactions, a core disabled by the kill instruction does not respond to snoop cycles on the system bus.

3. The dynamically reconfigurable multi-core microprocessor of claim 1 , wherein each initially enabled core is further configured, in response to the kill instruction, to put itself into a power-conserving sleep state.

4. The dynamically reconfigurable multi-core microprocessor of claim 1 , wherein other initially enabled cores not disabled by a kill instruction are configured, by internal power-state management microcode, to coordinate power state management between themselves without accounting for any requested power state value of any disabled cores.

5. A method for dynamically reconfiguring a multi-core microprocessor having a plurality of processing cores, the method comprising:

initially enabling the processing cores;

by each initially enabled core, executing a kill instruction issued by system software by disabling the core from responding to transactions on a system bus externally coupled to the multi-core microprocessor; and

wherein a kill-instruction-disabled core is disabled from complying with a reset message instruction sent over the system bus, but remains operable to be revived by an external reset on a reset pin of the multi-core microprocessor, and, if so reset, to resume operability as an enabled processing core unless and until it receives another kill instruction.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein as a result of being unresponsive to system bus transactions, a core disabled by the kill instruction does not respond to snoop cycles on the system bus.

7. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

by each initially enabled core, in response to the kill instruction, putting itself into a power-conserving sleep state.

8. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

by internal power-state management microcode of other initially enabled cores not disabled by a kill instruction, coordinating power state management between themselves without accounting for any requested power state value of any disabled cores.

9. A computer program product encoded in at least one non-transitory computer usable storage medium for use with a computing device, the computer program product comprising:

computer usable program code embodied in said medium, for specifying a dynamically reconfigurable multi-core microprocessor, the computer usable program code comprising:

program code for specifying a plurality of initially enabled processing cores;

each initially enabled core being configured to execute a kill instruction issued by system software by disabling the core from responding to transactions on a system bus externally coupled to the multi-core microprocessor, thereby disabling the core; and

wherein a kill-instruction-disabled core is disabled from complying with a reset message instruction sent over the system bus, but remains operable to be revived by an external reset on a reset pin of the multi-core microprocessor, and, if so reset, to resume operability as an enabled processing core unless and until it receives another kill instruction.

10. The computer program product of claim 9 , wherein as a result of being unresponsive to system bus transactions, a core disabled by the kill instruction does not respond to snoop cycles on the system bus.

11. The computer program product of claim 9 , wherein each initially enabled core is further configured, in response to the kill instruction, to put itself into a power-conserving sleep state.

12. The computer program product of claim 9 , wherein other initially enabled cores not disabled by a kill instruction are configured, by internal power-state management microcode, to coordinate power state management between themselves without accounting for any requested power state value of any disabled cores.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 21, 2011
From: HENRY, G. GLENN; GASKINS, STEPHAN
To: VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 027427/0877 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61426470 · Dec 22, 2010
Related Publication 20120166764A1 · Jun 28, 2012