IP Library Granted Patent US 9,033,175
Granted Patent B2
US 9,033,175 · App. 14/209,055 · Granted May 19, 2015

End closure with double anti-missile score

Inventor: Dennis K. Frank (Lafayette, CO)
Assignee: Ball Corporation
B65D17/163B21D51/383
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,033,175
App. No.
14/209,055
Granted
May 19, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

An end closure for food and beverage containers provides controlled opening characteristics to prevent the unintentional missiling of a tear panel. The end closure comprises a score line that defines a portion of the tear panel, and the end closure may comprise one or more anti-missile features that inhibit the propagation of a fracture down a score line, which reduces the likelihood that a tear panel will inadvertently detach from the end closure and injure the user or another.

Claims (41)

1. A metallic end closure with controlled opening characteristics, comprising:

a peripheral curl which is adapted for interconnection to a neck of a container body;

a central panel;

a countersink positioned between said peripheral curl and said central panel;

a pull tab having a nose end and a tail end, wherein said pull tab is operably interconnected to said central panel;

a first score line in said central panel which defines a tear panel; and

at least one anti-missile feature positioned proximate to said first score line which deforms at least a portion of said first score line to affect the rate at which said tear panel opens along said first score line when a user pivots said nose end of said pull tab into said tear panel, wherein a first anti-missile feature is positioned proximate a second anti-missile feature, and said first anti-missile feature and said second anti-missile feature are disposed on said tear panel.

2. The metallic end closure of claim 1 , further comprising a second score line positioned substantially parallel to said first score line, wherein said second score line has a shallower depth than said first score line.

3. The metallic end closure of claim 1 , wherein said at least one anti-missile feature comprises a depression formed in said central panel.

4. The metallic end closure of claim 3 , wherein said at least one anti-missile feature has a shape of at least one of a rectangle, a circle, an ovoid, a polygonal, a trapezium, and an arc shape.

5. The metallic end closure of claim 1 , wherein said at least one anti-missile feature is formed by a tool applying a force on a public side of said central panel to deform at least a portion of said first score line.

6. The metallic end closure of claim 1 , further comprising:

a check slot positioned in a portion of said first score line wherein said check slot has a shallower depth than said first score line.

7. The metallic end closure of claim 2 , wherein said at least one anti-missile feature is disposed over said second score line.

8. A metallic end closure with controlled opening characteristics, comprising:

a peripheral curl which is adapted for interconnection to a neck of a container body;

a central panel;

a countersink positioned between said peripheral curl and said central panel;

a pull tab having a nose end and a tail end, wherein said pull tab is operably interconnected to said central panel;

a first score line in said central panel which defines a tear panel, wherein said first score line comprises a check slot;

at least one anti-missile feature positioned proximate to said first score line which deforms at least a portion of said first score line to affect the rate at which said tear panel opens along said first score line when a user pivots said nose end of said pull tab into said tear panel; and

wherein a first anti-missile feature is positioned proximate a second anti-missile feature, wherein said first and second anti-missile features are substantially parallel.

9. The metallic end closure of claim 1 , wherein said at least one anti-missile feature is oriented at an angle from a plane that is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of said pull tab.

10. The metallic end closure of claim 9 , wherein said angle is between approximately 15 and 60 degrees.

11. A method of forming a metallic end closure with an anti-missile feature, comprising:

providing a blank metallic material;

forming an end closure comprising a peripheral curl, a central panel, and a countersink positioned there between;

forming a first score line on said central panel, wherein said first score line substantially defines a tear panel;

providing an insert tool with at least one shaped feature disposed on a distal end of said insert tool;

pressing said insert tool into at least one of said central panel and said tear panel such that said at least one shaped feature contacts said at least one of said central panel and said tear panel at a location proximate said first score line, wherein said at least one shaped feature creates at least one anti-missile feature in said end closure, wherein said at least one anti-missile feature is a double anti-missile feature comprising a first anti-missile feature and a second anti-missile feature, wherein said first and second anti-missile features are substantially parallel to each other; and

interconnecting a pull tab to said central panel of said end closure, wherein a nose of said pull tab is positioned over said tear panel.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

forming a second score line substantially parallel to said first score line, wherein said second score line has a shallower depth than said first score line.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein said at least one anti-missile feature is disposed over said second score line.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein said first and second anti-missile features have longitudinal axes which are oriented at an angle with respect to a vertical axis defined by the longitudinal orientation of said pull tab.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein said angle is between approximately 15 and 60 degrees.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein said at least one anti-missile feature has a shape of at least one of a rectangle, a circle, an ovoid, a polygonal, a trapezium, and an arc shape.

17. The method of claim 11 , wherein at least one anti-missile feature is disposed on the tear panel side of said first score line, and at least one anti-missile feature is disposed on the opposite side of said first score line.

18. The metallic end closure of claim 8 , wherein said first anti-missile feature and said second anti-missile feature are disposed on said tear panel.

19. The metallic end closure of claim 8 , further comprising a second score line positioned substantially parallel to said first score line, wherein said second score line has a shallower depth than said first score line.

20. The metallic end closure of claim 19 , wherein said at least one anti-missile feature is disposed over said second score line.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 28, 2014
From: FRANK, DENNIS K.
To: BALL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 032766/0841 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61800373 · Mar 15, 2013
Related Publication 20140263332A1 · Sep 18, 2014