IP Library › Granted Patent US 9,161,380
Granted Patent B2
US 9,161,380 · App. 13/551,535 · Granted Oct 13, 2015

Silent redial during mobile-originated call

Inventors: Arvind Swaminathan (San Diego, CA); Srinivasan Balasubramanian (San Diego, CA); Samir V. Ginde (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: QUALCOMM Incorporated
H04W76/027H04W48/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,161,380
App. No.
13/551,535
Granted
Oct 13, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

Aspects of the present disclosure provide techniques to speed up and improve silent redial success rates in wireless communications. A user equipment (UE) may determine how to attempt retrying a mobile originated (MO) call and procedures for selecting a subsequent system for attempting the call based, at least in part, on a restriction status of the call and a detected failure.

Claims (96)

1. A method for wireless communications, comprising:

detecting a failure that occurs during a mobile originated call;

determining how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call based, at least in part, on whether or not the mobile originated call is restricted to a particular radio access technology (RAT); and

attempting to retry the mobile originated call.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the failure is one of: a soft failure, a hard failure, and a no retry.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the failure is a hard failure; and

the determining how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call comprises, when the mobile originated call is not restricted, first attempting acquisition on inter-frequency neighbors and attempting acquisition on circuit-switched (CS) RAT when there is an acquisition failure on all of the inter-frequency neighbors.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

using inter-frequency and inter-RAT reselection parameters advertised in a system information block on a cell on which the mobile originated call was originated in an effort to determine the inter-frequency neighbors to scan and prioritizing frequencies to be used while scanning for the CS RAT.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the inter-frequency neighbors are skipped when the hard failure is classified into one that is caused by issues in a core network associated with the inter-frequency neighbors.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the failure is a hard failure; and

the determining how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call comprises, when the mobile originated call is restricted, ending the mobile originated call when no inter-frequency neighbors exist or when there is an acquisition failure on all of the inter-frequency neighbors.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the failure is a soft failure; and

the determining how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call comprises, when no inter-frequency neighbors exist, re-attempting the mobile originated call over a current system until a timer expires.

8. A method for wireless communications, comprising:

detecting a failure that occurs during a mobile originated call in a current system;

selecting a subsequent system for attempting the mobile originated call based, at least in part, on whether or not the mobile originated call is restricted to a particular radio access technology (RAT) and a feature of the failure; and

attempting the mobile originated call based on the selected subsequent system.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the subsequent system is the same as the current system when the failure is a soft failure or when the mobile originated call is restricted and the failure is a hard failure.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the subsequent system is different than the current system when the failure is a hard failure, the mobile originated call is not restricted, and acquisition failures occur on all neighbor frequencies.

11. An apparatus for wireless communications, comprising:

means for detecting a failure that occurs during a mobile originated call;

means for determining how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call based, at least in part, on whether or not the mobile originated call is restricted to a particular radio access technology (RAT); and

means for attempting to retry the mobile originated call.

12. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the failure is one of: a soft failure, a hard failure, and a no retry.

13. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein:

the failure is a hard failure; and

the means for determining how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call is configured to, when the mobile originated call is not restricted, first attempting acquisition on inter-frequency neighbors and attempting acquisition on circuit-switched (CS) RAT when there is an acquisition failure on all of the inter-frequency neighbors.

14. The apparatus of claim 13 , further comprising:

means for using inter-frequency and inter-RAT reselection parameters advertised in a system information block on a cell on which the mobile originated call was originated in an effort to determine the inter-frequency neighbors to scan and prioritizing frequencies to be used while scanning for the CS RAT.

15. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein the inter-frequency neighbors are skipped when the hard failure is classified into one that is caused by issues in a core network associated with the inter-frequency neighbors.

16. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein:

the failure is a hard failure; and

the means for determining how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call is configured to, when the mobile originated call is restricted, ending the mobile originated call when no inter-frequency neighbors exist or when there is an acquisition failure on all of the inter-frequency neighbors.

17. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein:

the failure is a soft failure; and

the means for determining how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call is configured to, when no inter-frequency neighbors exist, re-attempting the mobile originated call over a current system until a timer expires.

18. An apparatus for wireless communications, comprising:

means for detecting a failure that occurs during a mobile originated call in a current system;

means for selecting a subsequent system for attempting the mobile originated call based, at least in part, on whether or not the mobile originated call is restricted to a particular radio access technology (RAT) and a feature of the failure; and

means for attempting the mobile originated call based on the selected subsequent system.

19. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the subsequent system is the same as the current system when the failure is a soft failure or when the mobile originated call is restricted and the failure is a hard failure.

20. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the subsequent system is different than the current system when the failure is a hard failure, the mobile originated call is not restricted, and acquisition failures occur on all neighbor frequencies.

21. An apparatus for wireless communications, comprising:

at least one processor configured to:

detect a failure that occurs during a mobile originated call;

determine how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call based, at least in part, on whether or not the mobile originated call is restricted to a particular radio access technology (RAT); and

attempt to retry the mobile originated call; and

a memory coupled to the at least one processor.

22. The apparatus of claim 21 , wherein the failure is one of: a soft failure, a hard failure, and a no retry.

23. The apparatus of claim 21 , wherein:

the failure is a hard failure; and

the at least one processor is configured to determine how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call by, when the mobile originated call is not restricted, first attempting acquisition on inter-frequency neighbors and attempting acquisition on circuit-switched (CS) RAT when there is an acquisition failure on all of the inter-frequency neighbors.

24. The apparatus of claim 23 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:

use inter-frequency and inter-RAT reselection parameters advertised in a system information block on a cell on which the mobile originated call was originated in an effort to determine the inter-frequency neighbors to scan and prioritize frequencies to be used while scanning for the CS RAT.

25. The apparatus of claim 23 , wherein the inter-frequency neighbors are skipped when the hard failure is classified into one that is caused by issues in a core network associated with the inter-frequency neighbors.

26. The apparatus of claim 21 , wherein:

the failure is a hard failure; and

the at least one processor is configured to determine how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call based on, when the mobile originated call is restricted, ending the mobile originated call when no inter-frequency neighbors exist or when there is an acquisition failure on all of the inter-frequency neighbors.

27. The apparatus of claim 21 , wherein:

the failure is a soft failure; and

the at least one processor is configured to determining how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call based on, when no inter-frequency neighbors exist, re-attempting the mobile originated call over a current system until a timer expires.

28. An apparatus for wireless communications, comprising:

at least one processor configured to:

detect a failure that occurs during a mobile originated call in a current system;

select a subsequent system for attempting the mobile originated call based, at least in part, on whether or not the mobile originated call is restricted to a particular radio access technology (RAT) and a feature of the failure; and

attempt the mobile originated call based on the selected subsequent system; and

a memory coupled to the at least one processor.

29. The apparatus of claim 28 , wherein the subsequent system is the same as the current system when the failure is a soft failure or when the mobile originated call is restricted and the failure is a hard failure.

30. The apparatus of claim 28 , wherein the subsequent system is different than the current system when the failure is a hard failure, the mobile originated call is not restricted, and acquisition failures occur on all neighbor frequencies.

31. A non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with instructions executable by one or more processors to cause at least one computer to:

detect a failure that occurs during a mobile originated call;

determine how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call based, at least in part, on whether or not the mobile originated call is restricted to a particular radio access technology (RAT); and

attempt to retry the mobile originated call.

32. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 31 , wherein the failure is one of: a soft failure, a hard failure, and a no retry.

33. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 31 , wherein:

the failure is a hard failure; and

the instructions executable to determine how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call comprise instructions executable to, when the mobile originated call is not restricted, first attempt acquisition on inter-frequency neighbors and attempt acquisition on circuit-switched (CS) RAT when there is an acquisition failure on all of the inter-frequency neighbors.

34. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 33 , further comprising:

instructions executable to use inter-frequency and inter-RAT reselection parameters advertised in a system information block on a cell on which the mobile originated call was originated in an effort to determine the inter-frequency neighbors to scan and prioritize frequencies to be used while scanning for the CS RAT.

35. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 33 , wherein the inter-frequency neighbors are skipped when the hard failure is classified into one that is caused by issues in a core network associated with the inter-frequency neighbors.

36. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 31 , wherein:

the failure is a hard failure; and

the instructions executable to determine how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call comprise instructions executable to, when the mobile originated call is restricted, end the mobile originated call when no inter-frequency neighbors exist or when there is an acquisition failure on all of the inter-frequency neighbors.

37. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 31 , wherein:

the failure is a soft failure; and

the instructions executable to determine how to attempt retrying the mobile originated call comprise instructions executable to, when no inter-frequency neighbors exist, re-attempt the mobile originated call over a current system until a timer expires.

38. A non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with instructions executable by one or more processors to cause at least one computer to:

detect a failure that occurs during a mobile originated call in a current system;

select a subsequent system for attempting the mobile originated call based, at least in part, on whether or not the mobile originated call is restricted to a particular radio access technology (RAT) and a feature of the failure; and

attempt the mobile originated call based on the selected subsequent system.

39. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 38 , wherein the subsequent system is the same as the current system when the failure is a soft failure or when the mobile originated call is restricted and the failure is a hard failure.

40. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 38 , wherein the subsequent system is different than the current system when the failure is a hard failure, the mobile originated call is not restricted, and acquisition failures occur on all neighbor frequencies.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2012
From: SWAMINATHAN, ARVIND; BALASUBRAMANIAN, SRINIVASAN; GINDE, SAMIR V.
To: QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 028570/0619 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61509470 · Jul 19, 2011
Related Publication 20130023265A1 · Jan 24, 2013